Effect of cantilevers' dimensions on phase contrast in multifrequency atomic force microscopy

2019 ◽  
Vol 82 (9) ◽  
pp. 1438-1447
Author(s):  
Milad Ehsanipour ◽  
Mehrnoosh Damircheli ◽  
Babak Eslami
1997 ◽  
Vol 3 (S2) ◽  
pp. 1275-1276
Author(s):  
Sergei Magonov

Phase detection in TappingMode™ enhances capabilities of Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) for soft samples (polymers and biological materials). Changes of amplitude and phase changes of a fast oscillating probe are caused by tip-sample force interactions. Height images reflect the amplitude changes, and in most cases they present a sample topography. Phase images show local differences between phases of free-oscillating probe and of probe interacting with a sample surface. These differences are related to the change of the resonance frequency of the probe either by attractive or repulsive tip-sample forces. Therefore phase detection helps to choose attractive or repulsive force regime for surface imaging and to minimize tip-sample force. For heterogeneous materials the phase imaging allows to distinguish individual components and to visualize their distribution due to differences in phase contrast. This is typically achieved in moderate tapping, when set-point amplitude, Asp, is about half of the amplitude of free-oscillating cantilever, Ao. In contrast, light tapping with Asp close to Ao is best suited for recording a true topography of the topmost surface layer of soft samples. Examples of phase imaging of polymers obtained with a scanning probe microscope Nanoscope® IIIa (Digital Instruments). Si probes (225 μk long, resonance frequencies 150-200 kHz) were used.


2003 ◽  
Vol 97 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 145-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew S. Marcus ◽  
M.A. Eriksson ◽  
Darryl Y. Sasaki ◽  
Robert W. Carpick

2008 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-99
Author(s):  
Dmitriy Sheglov ◽  
Aleksandr Latyshev ◽  
V. Popkov

Nanoscale ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lene Gammelgaard ◽  
Patrick Rebsdorf Whelan ◽  
Timothy J Booth ◽  
Peter Bøggild

In this work, we use atomic force microscopy (AFM) to investigate the long-term evolution of oxidative defects of tungsten diselenide (WSe2) in ambient conditions over a period of 75 months,...


RSC Advances ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (78) ◽  
pp. 63909-63916 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Y. Abuelfilat ◽  
Y. Kim ◽  
P. Miller ◽  
S. P. Hoo ◽  
J. Li ◽  
...  

By combining phase contrast X-ray ultramicroscopy and nanoindentation with atomic force microscopy, the mechanics of individual hydrogel pores as well as their collective performance as a scaffold can be modelled and simulated.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arindam Phani ◽  
Ho Sang Jung ◽  
Seonghwan Kim

AbstractPhase-contrast in tapping-mode atomic force microscopy (TM-AFM) results from dynamic tip-surface interaction losses which allow soft and hard nanoscale features to be distinguished. So far, phase-contrast in TM-AFM has been interpreted using homogeneous Boltzmann-like loss distributions that ignore fluctuations. Here, we revisit the origin of phase-contrast in TM-AFM by considering the role of fluctuation-driven transitions and heterogeneous loss. At ultra-light tapping amplitudes <3 nm, a unique amplitude dependent two-stage distribution response is revealed, alluding to metastable viscous relaxations that originate from tapping-induced surface perturbations. The elastic and viscous coefficients are also quantitatively estimated from the resulting strain rate at the fixed tapping frequency. The transitional heterogeneous losses emerge as the dominant loss mechanism outweighing homogeneous losses at smaller amplitudes for a soft-material. Analogous fluctuation mediated phase-contrast is also apparent in contact resonance enhanced AFM-IR (infrared), showing promise in decoupling competing thermal loss mechanisms via radiative and non-radiative pathways. Understanding the loss pathways can provide insights on the bio-physical origins of heterogeneities in soft-bio-matter e.g., single cancer cell, tumors, and soft-tissues.


Wear ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 249 (7) ◽  
pp. 617-625 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.-S. Ahn ◽  
S.A. Chizhik ◽  
A.M. Dubravin ◽  
V.P. Kazachenko ◽  
V.V. Popov

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document