Microvascularization of corpus luteum of bovine treated with equine chorionic gonadotropin

2015 ◽  
Vol 78 (9) ◽  
pp. 747-753 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Eduardo Bezerra Moura ◽  
Nathia Nathaly Rigoglio ◽  
Janine Karla França S. Braz ◽  
Marcello Machado ◽  
Pietro S. Baruselli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Corpus Luteum ◽  
Chorionic Gonadotropin ◽  
Equine Chorionic Gonadotropin

scholarly journals Differential expression and regulation of prostaglandin E synthases in the mouse ovary during sexual maturation and luteal development

2006 ◽  
Vol 189 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tong Sun ◽  
Wen-Bo Deng ◽  
Hong-Lu Diao ◽  
Hua Ni ◽  
Yu-Yan Bai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Corpus Luteum ◽  
Chorionic Gonadotropin ◽  
Granulosa Cells ◽  
Sexual Maturation ◽  
Mrna Level ◽  
Follicular Development ◽  
Prostaglandin E ◽  
Female Reproduction ◽  
Mouse Ovary ◽  
Equine Chorionic Gonadotropin

Prostaglandin (PGE) 2 is the most common prostanoid and plays an important role in female reproduction. The aim of this study was to examine the expression and regulation of microsomal (m) PGE synthase (PGES)-1 and cytosolic (c) PGES in the mouse ovary during sexual maturation, gonadotropin treatment and luteal development by in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry. Both mPGES-1 mRNA signals and immunostaining were localized in the granulosa cells, but not in the thecal cells and oocytes. cPGES mRNA signals were localized in both granulosa cells and oocytes, whereas cPGES immunostaining was exclusively localized in the oocytes. In our superovulated model of immature mice, there was a basal level of mPGES-1 mRNA signals in the granulosa cells at 48 h after equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG) treatment. mPGES-1 mRNA level was induced by human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) treatment for 0.5 h, whereas mPGES-1 immunostaining was slightly induced at 0.5 h after hCG treatment and reached a maximal level at 3 h after hCG treatment. eCG treatment had no obvious effects on either cPGES mRNA signals or immunostaining. A strong level of cPGES immunostaining was present in both unstimulated and eCG-treated groups. Both mPGES-1 mRNA signals and immunostaining were highly detected in the corpus luteum 2 days post-hCG injection and declined from days 3 to 7 post-hCG injection. cPGES immunostaining was at a basal level or not detectable from days 1 to 7 after hCG injection and was highly expressed in the corpus luteum from days 9 to 15 post-hCG injection. PGE2 biosynthesized through the mPGES-1 pathway may be important for follicular development, ovulation and luteal formation.

scholarly journals Equine Chorionic Gonadotropin Modulates the Expression of Genes Related to the Structure and Function of the Bovine Corpus Luteum

PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. e0164089 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liza Margareth Medeiros de Carvalho Sousa ◽  
Gabriela Pacheco Mendes ◽  
Danila Barreiro Campos ◽  
Pietro Sampaio Baruselli ◽  
Paula de Carvalho Papa
Keyword(s):  
Corpus Luteum ◽  
Chorionic Gonadotropin ◽  
Structure And Function ◽  
Expression Of Genes ◽  
Bovine Corpus Luteum ◽  
Equine Chorionic Gonadotropin ◽  
And Function

Efficiency of mating, artificial insemination or resynchronisation at different times after first timed artificial insemination in postpartum Nellore cows to produce crossbred calves

2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walvonvitis Baes Rodrigues ◽  
Jean do Prado Jara ◽  
Juliana Correa Borges ◽  
Luiz Orcirio Fialho de Oliveira ◽  
Urbano Pinto Gomes de Abreu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Breeding Season ◽  
Chorionic Gonadotropin ◽  
Artificial Insemination ◽  
Fixed Time ◽  
Beef Cows ◽  
Device Removal ◽  
Oestradiol Benzoate ◽  
Timed Artificial Insemination ◽  
Equine Chorionic Gonadotropin

The objective of this trial was to evaluate different post-timed artificial insemination (TAI) reproductive managements in postpartum beef cows to produce crossbred calves from artificial insemination (AI). Nellore cows (n = 607), with 45 days postpartum, were inseminated at a fixed time, using a protocol that included an intravaginal progesterone-releasing device along with oestradiol benzoate, prostaglandin, equine chorionic gonadotropin, and oestradiol cypionate, followed TAI 48 h post-device removal. Four post-TAI treatments were evaluated: in CONTROL (T1, n = 161), cows were exposed to Nellore clean-up bulls until the end of the breeding season (75 days). In OBSERVATION (T2, n = 132), heat detection was performed for 15–25 days post-TAI, followed by AI. In RESYNC22 (T3, n = 157) and RESYNC30 (T4, n = 157), resynchronisation started after 22 or 30 days, following second TAI at Day 32 or 40 days after first TAI. In T2, T3 and T4, after the second AI, cows were exposed to Nellore clean-up bulls until the end of the breeding season (75 days). The pregnancy rate (PR) for the first TAI did not differ (54.6%, 53.0%, 59.2%, and 51.6% for CONTROL, OBSERVATION, RESYNC 22, and RESYNC 30, respectively; P = 0.66), and no difference was observed for the second TAI (RESYNC 22 = 45.31% and RESYNC30 = 46.05%; P = 0.137), in the PR at the end of the breeding season (86.33%, 86.36%, 78.98%, and 81.52%, P = 0.43), or embryonic losses (4.54%, 2.85%, 6.45% and 7.40%, respectively; P = 0.61), but the percentage of crossbred pregnancy was higher in groups with resynchronisation (RESYNC22 and RESYNC30) than CONTROL and OBSERVATION (98.38%, 90.62%, 63.30%, 78.95%, P < 0.001). In conclusion, resynchronisation programs of 22 or 30 days are more efficient to produce AI products, and the final pregnancy rate is similar among the treatments, differing only in the amount of calves produced by AI.

scholarly journals Comparative gene expression profiling of mouse ovaries upon stimulation with natural equine chorionic gonadotropin (N-eCG) and tethered recombinant-eCG (R-eCG)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kwan-Sik Min ◽  
Jong-Ju Park ◽  
So-Yun Lee ◽  
Munkhzaya Byambaragchaa ◽  
Myung-Hwa Kang
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Chorionic Gonadotropin ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Expression System ◽  
Laboratory Animals ◽  
Metabolic Clearance ◽  
Qrt Pcr ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Equine Chorionic Gonadotropin

Abstract Background: Equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG) induces super-ovulation in laboratory animals. Notwithstanding its extensive usage, limited information is available regarding the differences between the in vivo effects of natural eCG (N-eCG) and recombinant eCG (R-eCG). This study aimed to investigate the gene expression profiles of mouse ovaries upon stimulation with N-eCG and R-eCG produced from CHO-suspension (CHO-S) cells. R-eCG gene was constructed and transfected into CHO-S cells and quantified. Subsequently, we determined the metabolic clearance rate (MCR) of N-eCG and R-eCG up to 24 h after intravenous administration through the mice tail vein and identified differentially expressed genes in both ovarian tissues, via quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) and immunohistochemistry (IHC).Results: R-eCG was markedly expressed initially after transfection and maintained until recovery on day 9. Glycan chains were substantially modified in R-eCG protein produced from CHO-S cells and eliminated through PNGase F treatment. The MCR was higher for R-eCG than for N-eCG, and no significant difference was observed after 60 min. Notwithstanding their low concentrations, R-eCG and N-eCG were detected in the blood at 24h post-injection. Microarray analysis of ovarian tissue revealed that 20 of 12,816 genes assessed therein were significantly up-regulated and 43 genes were down-regulated by >2-fold in the group that received R-eCG (63 [0.49%] differentially regulated genes in total). The microarray results were concurrent with and hence validated by those of RT-PCR, qRT-PCR, and IHC analyses.Conclusions: The present results indicate that R-eCG can be adequately produced through a cell-based expression system through post-translational modification of eCG and can induce ovulation in vivo. These results provide novel insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying the up- or down-regulation of specific ovarian genes and the production of R-eCG with enhanced biological activity in vivo.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document