scholarly journals Substrate rigidity regulates Ca2+oscillation via RhoA pathway in stem cells

2009 ◽  
Vol 218 (2) ◽  
pp. 285-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tae-Jin Kim ◽  
Jihye Seong ◽  
Mingxing Ouyang ◽  
Jie Sun ◽  
Shaoying Lu ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Małgorzata Witkowska-Zimny ◽  
Katarzyna Walenko ◽  
Anna Ewa Wałkiewicz ◽  
Zygmunt Pojda ◽  
Jacek Przybylski ◽  
...  

Tissue formation and maintenance is regulated by various factors, including biological, physiological and physical signals transmitted between cells as well as originating from cell-substrate interactions. In our study, the osteogenic potential of mesenchymal stromal/stem cells isolated from umbilical cord Wharton's jelly (UC-MSCs) was investigated in relation to the substrate rigidity on polyacrylamide hydrogel (PAAM). Osteogenic differentiation of UC-MSCs was enhanced on stiff substrate compared to soft substrates, illustrating that the mechanical environment can play a role in differentiation of this type of cells. These results show that substrate stiffness can regulate UC-MSCs differentiation, and hence may have significant implications for design of biomaterials with appropriate mechanical properties for regenerative medicine.


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 1109-1119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Balu Venugopal ◽  
Pankaj Mogha ◽  
Jyotsna Dhawan ◽  
Abhijit Majumder

Cell–cell interactionviasubstrate deformation in turn modifies cellular response to substrate rigidity.


2010 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 455-455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dongyan Shi ◽  
Dan Ma ◽  
Feiqing Dong ◽  
Chen Zong ◽  
Liyue Liu ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 34 (8) ◽  
pp. S39-S39
Author(s):  
Dewu Liu ◽  
Honglan Xiong ◽  
Yuangui Mao ◽  
Peixin Huang ◽  
Jianping Chen ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 34 (8) ◽  
pp. S36-S36
Author(s):  
Ping Duan ◽  
Xuelin Ren ◽  
Wenhai Yan ◽  
Xuefei Han ◽  
Xu Yan ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 34 (8) ◽  
pp. S43-S43
Author(s):  
Wei‑ying Zou ◽  
Bei Yang ◽  
Xiuli Ni ◽  
Da‑lei Zhang ◽  
Lei Wu ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben L. Carty ◽  
Elaine M. Dunleavy

Abstract Asymmetric cell division (ACD) produces daughter cells with separate distinct cell fates and is critical for the development and regulation of multicellular organisms. Epigenetic mechanisms are key players in cell fate determination. Centromeres, epigenetically specified loci defined by the presence of the histone H3-variant, centromere protein A (CENP-A), are essential for chromosome segregation at cell division. ACDs in stem cells and in oocyte meiosis have been proposed to be reliant on centromere integrity for the regulation of the non-random segregation of chromosomes. It has recently been shown that CENP-A is asymmetrically distributed between the centromeres of sister chromatids in male and female Drosophila germline stem cells (GSCs), with more CENP-A on sister chromatids to be segregated to the GSC. This imbalance in centromere strength correlates with the temporal and asymmetric assembly of the mitotic spindle and potentially orientates the cell to allow for biased sister chromatid retention in stem cells. In this essay, we discuss the recent evidence for asymmetric sister centromeres in stem cells. Thereafter, we discuss mechanistic avenues to establish this sister centromere asymmetry and how it ultimately might influence cell fate.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document