Mental capacity to consent to treatment and admission decisions in older adult psychiatric inpatients

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (12) ◽  
pp. 1367-1375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kate Maxmin ◽  
Claudia Cooper ◽  
Laurence Potter ◽  
Gill Livingston
Keyword(s):  
Older Adult ◽  
Psychiatric Inpatients ◽  
Mental Capacity ◽  
Capacity To Consent ◽  
Consent To Treatment ◽  
Admission Decisions

4. Consent to Treatment

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Herring
Keyword(s):  
Mental Capacity ◽  
Best Interests ◽  
Living Wills ◽  
Ethical Aspects ◽  
Capacity To Consent ◽  
Delicate Balance ◽  
Mental Capacity Act 2005 ◽  
Consent To Treatment ◽  
Advance Decisions ◽  
Mental Capacity Act

This chapter examines the legal and ethical aspects of treating a patient without consent. It considers the meaning of ‘consent’ and the position of patients who lack the capacity to consent. For children who lack capacity, consent involves a delicate balance between the rights of the children and those of their parents. For adults lacking capacity, the Mental Capacity Act 2005 has emphasized the ‘best interests’ test, but has largely left open the question of how a person’s best interests are to be ascertained. The chapter also considers what weight should be attached to advance decisions (sometimes called living wills).

4. Consent to Treatment

2020 ◽  
pp. 151-232
Author(s):  
Jonathan Herring
Keyword(s):  
Mental Capacity ◽  
Best Interests ◽  
Living Wills ◽  
Ethical Aspects ◽  
Capacity To Consent ◽  
Delicate Balance ◽  
Mental Capacity Act 2005 ◽  
Consent To Treatment ◽  
Advance Decisions ◽  
Mental Capacity Act

This chapter examines the legal and ethical aspects of treating a patient without consent. It considers the meaning of ‘consent’ and the position of patients who lack the capacity to consent. For children who lack capacity, consent involves a delicate balance between the rights of the children and those of their parents. For adults lacking capacity, the Mental Capacity Act 2005 has emphasized the ‘best interests’ test, but has largely left open the question of how a person’s best interests are to be ascertained. The chapter also considers what weight should be attached to advance decisions (sometimes called living wills).

scholarly journals Mental capacity to consent to treatment in anorexia nervosa: explorative study

BJPsych Open ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 147-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isis F.F.M. Elzakkers ◽  
Unna N. Danner ◽  
Hans W. Hoek ◽  
Annemarie A van Elburg
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Anorexia Nervosa ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Previous Treatment ◽  
Mental Capacity ◽  
Central Coherence ◽  
Set Shifting ◽  
Capacity To Consent ◽  
Explorative Study ◽  
Consent To Treatment

BackgroundMental capacity to consent to treatment in anorexia nervosa is a neglected area in clinical decision-making.AimsTo examine clinical and neuropsychological parameters associated with diminished mental capacity in anorexia nervosa.MethodAn explorative study was conducted in 70 adult female patients with severe anorexia nervosa. Mental capacity to consent to treatment was assessed by experienced psychiatrists. Further measurements included the MacCAT-T (to assess mental capacity status), a range of clinical measures (body mass index (BMI) and comorbidity) and neuropsychological tests assessing decision-making, central coherence and set-shifting capacity.ResultsDiminished mental capacity occurs in a third of patients with severe anorexia nervosa and is associated with a low BMI, less appreciation of illness and treatment, previous treatment for anorexia nervosa, low social functioning and poor set shifting.ConclusionsAssessment of diminished mental capacity in anorexia nervosa requires careful evaluation of not only BMI, but also the degree of appreciation of illness and treatment, history and the tendency to have a rigid thinking style.

Decisional capacity to consent to treatment and anaesthesia in patients over the age of 60 undergoing major orthopaedic surgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 247-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriele Mandarelli ◽  
Giovanna Parmigiani ◽  
Felice Carabellese ◽  
Silvia Codella ◽  
Paolo Roma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Informed Consent ◽  
Orthopaedic Surgery ◽  
Decisional Capacity ◽  
Capacity To Consent ◽  
Capacity Evaluation ◽  
Decision Making Capacity ◽  
Consent To Treatment ◽  
Major Orthopaedic Surgery ◽  
Pain Symptoms ◽  
State Examination

Despite growing attention to the ability of patients to provide informed consent to treatment in different medical settings, few studies have dealt with the issue of informed consent to major orthopaedic surgery in those over the age of 60. This population is at risk of impaired decision-making capacity (DMC) because older age is often associated with a decline in cognitive function, and they often present with anxiety and depressive symptoms, which could also affect their capacity to consent to treatment. Consent to major orthopaedic surgery requires the patient to understand, retain and reason about complex procedures. This study was undertaken to extend the literature on decisional capacity to consent to surgery and anaesthesia of patients over the age of 60 undergoing major orthopaedic surgery. Recruited patients ( N=83) were evaluated using the Aid to Capacity Evaluation, the Beck Depression Inventory, the State–Trait Anxiety Inventory Y, the Mini-Mental State Examination and a visual analogue scale for measuring pain symptomatology. Impairment of medical DMC was common in the overall sample, with about 50% of the recruited patients showing a doubtful ability, or overt inability, to provide informed consent. Poor cognitive functioning was associated with reduced medical DMC, although no association was found between decisional capacity and depressive, anxiety and pain symptoms. These findings underline the need of an in-depth assessment of capacity in older patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery.

scholarly journals The Mental Capacity Act 2005: review of mental capacity assessment in people with proximal femoral fracture

2010 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 284-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Guyver ◽  
P. Hindle ◽  
J. Harrison ◽  
N. Jain ◽  
M. Brinsden
Keyword(s):  
Staff Training ◽  
Femoral Fractures ◽  
Proximal Femoral Fracture ◽  
Mental Capacity ◽  
Clinical Implications ◽  
Proximal Femoral Fractures ◽  
Mental Capacity Act 2005 ◽  
Consent To Treatment ◽  
Mental Capacity Act ◽  
The Impact

Aims and methodTo ascertain whether patients with proximal femoral fractures were being correctly assessed in line with the Mental Capacity Act 2005. Fifty people admitted with proximal femoral fractures were audited to assess whether they had given consent to treatment in accordance with the Act. A Mental Capacity Act 2005 guidance and assessment form was then introduced accompanied by staff training. A re-audit was undertaken to assess the impact.ResultsThe initial audit showed that only one person (2%) had been properly assessed. The re-audit demonstrated that the use of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 assessment form ensured correct assessment.Clinical implicationsOur findings suggest the form is a useful tool in the documentation and assessment of an individual's capacity under the Mental Capacity Act.

The Relationship Between Executive Functions and Capacity to Consent to Treatment in Acute Psychiatric Hospitalization

2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 63-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriele Mandarelli ◽  
Giovanna Parmigiani ◽  
Lorenzo Tarsitani ◽  
Paola Frati ◽  
Massimo Biondi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Executive Functions ◽  
Psychiatric Hospitalization ◽  
Capacity To Consent ◽  
Consent To Treatment ◽  
The Relationship

scholarly journals Validation of the French Version of the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatment (MacCAT-T) in a French Sample of Individuals with Schizophrenia: Validation de la version française de l’instrument d’évaluation des compétences MacArthur-traitement (MacCAT-T) dans un échantillon français de personnes souffrant de schizophrénie

2020 ◽  
pp. 070674372096644
Author(s):  
Stéphane Raffard ◽  
Cindy Lebrun ◽  
Yasmine Laraki ◽  
Delphine Capdevielle
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Competence Assessment ◽  
Rater Reliability ◽  
French Version ◽  
Capacity To Consent ◽  
Decision Making Capacity ◽  
Consent To Treatment ◽  
High Degree

Background: Assessing an individual’s capacity to consent to treatment is a complex and challenging task for psychiatrists and health-care professionals. Diminished capacity to consent to pharmacological treatment is a common concern in individuals with schizophrenia. The MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatment (MacCAT-T) is the most common tool used in individuals with schizophrenia to evaluate the decision-making abilities for judgments about competence to consent to treatment. This instrument assesses patients’ competence to make treatment decisions by examining their capacities in 4 areas: understanding information relevant to their condition and the recommended treatment, reasoning about the potential risks and benefits of their choices, appreciating the nature of their situation and the consequences of their choices, and expressing a choice. Despite its importance, there is no French version of this scale. Furthermore, its factor structure has never been explored, although validated measures are strongly needed to further detect deficits in patients’ decision-making abilities. The goal of this study was thus to empirically validate a French version of the MacCAT-T in a French sample of individuals with schizophrenia. Method: In this cross-sectional study, we included 125 inpatients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia from the University Department of Adult Psychiatry in Montpellier. The MacCAT-T was administered to patients by a trained psychologist. Patients were also assessed for severity of symptoms, insight into illness, and depressive and anxiety symptoms. Inter-rater reliability and psychometric properties including internal consistency, construct validity, and discriminant and divergent validity were also investigated. Results: The MacCAT-T’s internal consistency was high (Cronbach α of 0.91). A high degree of inter-rater reliability was found for all the areas of the MacCAT-T (intraclass correlation coefficient range, 0.92 to 0.98). Exploratory factor analysis revealed a 2-factor model. The factor analysis explained 50.03% of the total score variation. Component 1 included all subparts of “understanding.” Component 2 included all subparts of “appreciation” and “reasoning” and was therefore labeled “reflexivity.” After Bonferroni corrections, decision-making capacity was positively associated with insight and the severity of psychotic symptoms but not with sociodemographic variables except for education. Conclusions: The MacCAT-T demonstrated a high degree of inter-rater reliability and strong psychometric properties. The French version of the MacCAT-T is a valid instrument to assess the decision-making capacity to consent to treatment in a French sample of individuals with schizophrenia.

[P3-478]: AN EVALUATION OF MENTAL CAPACITY ACT ASSESSMENT DOCUMENTATION ON OLDER ADULT PSYCHIATRY WARDS

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (7S_Part_24) ◽  
pp. P1159-P1160
Author(s):  
Sarah Amy Jones ◽  
Bushra Azam ◽  
Nav Ahluwalia
Keyword(s):  
Older Adult ◽  
Mental Capacity ◽  
Adult Psychiatry ◽  
Mental Capacity Act ◽  
Act Assessment
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document