Federal policy of controlling nonpoint source water pollution generated by federal facilities and land management practices on a watershed basis

2001 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-79
Author(s):  
Steven J. Hipfel
1999 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodney B.W. Smith ◽  
Theodore D. Tomasi

Assuming asymmetric information over farmer profits and zero transaction costs, prior literature has suggested that when regulating nonpoint source water pollution, a tax on management practices (inputs) can implement full-information allocations and is superior to a tax on estimated runoff. Using mechanism design theory under asymmetric information, this paper shows that under the same assumptions, management practice taxes and taxes on estimated runoff are equally efficient.


1992 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 623-628 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith Kozloff ◽  
Steven J. Taff ◽  
Yingmin Wang

2015 ◽  
Vol 72 (5) ◽  
pp. 730-737 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. C. Roebeling ◽  
M. C. Cunha ◽  
L. Arroja ◽  
M. E. van Grieken

Marine ecosystems are affected by water pollution originating from coastal catchments. The delivery of water pollutants can be reduced through water pollution abatement as well as water pollution treatment. Hence, sustainable economic development of coastal regions requires balancing of the marginal costs from water pollution abatement and/or treatment and the associated marginal benefits from marine resource appreciation. Water pollution delivery reduction costs are, however, not equal across abatement and treatment options. In this paper, an optimal control approach is developed and applied to explore welfare maximizing rates of water pollution abatement and/or treatment for efficient diffuse source water pollution management in terrestrial-marine systems. For the case of diffuse source dissolved inorganic nitrogen water pollution in the Tully-Murray region, Queensland, Australia, (agricultural) water pollution abatement cost, (wetland) water pollution treatment cost and marine benefit functions are determined to explore welfare maximizing rates of water pollution abatement and/or treatment. Considering partial (wetland) treatment costs and positive water quality improvement benefits, results show that welfare gains can be obtained, primarily, through diffuse source water pollution abatement (improved agricultural management practices) and, to a minor extent, through diffuse source water pollution treatment (wetland restoration).


Author(s):  
P. Aarne Vesilind ◽  
J. Jeffrey Peirce ◽  
Ruth F. Weiner

Author(s):  
J. Jeffrey Peirce ◽  
Ruth F. Weiner ◽  
P. Aarne Vesilind

1988 ◽  
pp. 215-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Aarne Vesilind ◽  
J. Jeffrey Peirce ◽  
Ruth F. Weiner

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document