Effects of torsion on the behavior of peripheral steel-braced frame systems

2011 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 491-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emrah Erduran ◽  
Keri L. Ryan
Keyword(s):  
Braced Frame ◽  
Frame Systems ◽  
Steel Braced Frame

11.06: Application of hybrid simulation for the evaluation of the buckling response of steel braced frame columns

ce/papers ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 2877-2886 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Imanpour ◽  
Martin Leclerc ◽  
Romain Siguier ◽  
Robert Tremblay
Keyword(s):  
Hybrid Simulation ◽  
Braced Frame ◽  
Steel Braced Frame

Comparative Study on the Pseudo-Dynamic Testing of Semi-Rigid Connection of Steel Frames with or without Brace

2011 ◽  
Vol 194-196 ◽  
pp. 2001-2007
Author(s):  
Jia Lv ◽  
Qi Lin Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Dynamic Testing ◽  
Dynamic Test ◽  
Lateral Force ◽  
Steel Frame ◽  
Seismic Loads ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Shearing Force ◽  
Braced Frame ◽  
Rigid Connection ◽  
Steel Braced Frame

The horizontal stiffness of steel frame is relatively weak. So designers introduce brace system into steel frame to increase the horizontal stiffness. In order to guarantee the safety of the structure, we should imitate the performance of the structure under seismic loads. In this paper, the pseudo-dynamic test was conducted on the semi-rigid connection of steel frame and the semi-rigid connection of steel-braced frame. The test results show that the brace can increase the ductility of the structure, decrease the displacement of the top floor, decrease the interlayer displacement, and bear ground floor shearing-force. So the brace greatly impacts the performance of the structure. It has the ability of anti-earthquake and strong resistance ability of lateral force.

Ground Motion Intensity Measures for Rocking Building Systems

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 1533-1554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehrdad Shokrabadi ◽  
Henry V. Burton
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motion ◽  
Structural Response ◽  
Ground Acceleration ◽  
Intensity Measures ◽  
Braced Frame ◽  
Residual Drift ◽  
Engineering Demand Parameter ◽  
Frame System ◽  
Ground Motion Records ◽  
Steel Braced Frame

This paper investigates the effectiveness of various ground motion intensity measures (IMs) in estimating the structural response of two types of rocking systems: (a) a controlled rocking steel braced frame system with self-centering action and (b) a rocking spine system for reinforced concrete infill frames. The IMs are evaluated based on the dispersion in engineering demand parameter (EDP) predictions (efficiency) and the sensitivity of the conditional distributions of EDPs to the distributions of the magnitudes, distances and spectral shape parameter (ε) of ground motion records (sufficiency). The EDPs include maximum transient and residual story drifts and peak floor accelerations. The spectral acceleration averaged over a range of periods (Sa avg) is most effective for predicting transient and residual drift demands and peak ground acceleration (PGA) is generally the best predictor of peak floor accelerations. The proximity of the frequency range most affecting an EDP to that best reflected in an IM is found to be a good indicator of the performance of that IM.

Code provisions for seismic design for concentrically braced steel frames

1992 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 1025-1031 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. G. Redwood ◽  
A. K. Jain
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Design ◽  
Structural Engineering ◽  
Steel Frames ◽  
Braced Frames ◽  
Concentrically Braced Frames ◽  
Braced Frame ◽  
Concentrically Braced ◽  
Interstorey Drift ◽  
Available Information ◽  
Steel Braced Frame

Extensive research into the inelastic seismic response of concentrically braced frames and their components has been carried out in the last two decades. This knowledge has now been incorporated into seismic design practice in several countries, notably the U.S.A., Canada, and New Zealand. In this paper, design specifications from these three countries, which derive largely from the same body of research, are compared. The basic design philosophy for concentrically braced steel frames, loading, and member detailing are examined. It is concluded that, in general, the Canadian specifications are in conformity with the available information and have many similar features to codes of the other countries. Significant differences exist in the classification of braced frames, between interstorey drift requirements, in the treatment of dual structural systems, and to a lesser extent in member detailing requirements. Some features of Canadian codes meriting review are identified. Key words: structural engineering, earthquakes, standards, steel, braced frame, ductility, concentric bracing, dual system.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document