A Simple Fabrication Method for Three-Dimensional Gold Nanoparticle Electrodes and Their Application to the Study of the Direct Electrochemistry of Cytochromec

2010 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 185-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenichi Murata ◽  
Kazuki Kajiya ◽  
Megumi Nukaga ◽  
Yosuke Suga ◽  
Toshiyuki Watanabe ◽  
...  
Nanoscale ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (21) ◽  
pp. 10247-10256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaodong Cao ◽  
Xueting Zhu ◽  
Shudong He ◽  
Xuan Xu ◽  
Yongkang Ye ◽  
...  

Three-dimensional (3D) networked nanomaterials have attracted great interest because of their unique porous and 3D-networked structures.


2011 ◽  
Vol 211-212 ◽  
pp. 1105-1109
Author(s):  
Xi Qiu Fan

Traditional optical lithography techniques to fabricate three-dimensional (3D) nanostructures are complicated and time consuming. Due to the capability to replicate nanostructures repeatedly in a large area with high resolution and uniformity, nanoimprint (NI) has been recognized as one of the promising approaches to fabricate 3-D nanostructures with high throughput and low cost. This paper introduces a novel 3-D nanostructure fabrication method by nanoimprint on silicon substrate. Nanoscale gratings and microlens array are taken as examples of 3-D nanostructures fabricated by nanoimprint. High fidelity demonstrates the possibility of nanoimprint to fabricate 3-D nanostructures on silicon substrate.


2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-186
Author(s):  
Ming-Hao Yao ◽  
Jie Yang ◽  
Dong-Hui Zhao ◽  
Rui-Xue Xia ◽  
Rui-Mei Jin ◽  
...  

A facile method for in situ fabrication of three-dimensional gold nanoparticles micropatterns throughout a polyethylene glycol hydrogel substrate has been developed by combining photochemical synthesis of gold nanoparticles with photolithography technology.


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna V. Nielsen ◽  
Michael J. Beauchamp ◽  
Gregory P. Nordin ◽  
Adam T. Woolley

Traditional microfabrication techniques suffer from several disadvantages, including the inability to create truly three-dimensional (3D) architectures, expensive and time-consuming processes when changing device designs, and difficulty in transitioning from prototyping fabrication to bulk manufacturing. 3D printing is an emerging technique that could overcome these disadvantages. While most 3D printed fluidic devices and features to date have been on the millifluidic size scale, some truly microfluidic devices have been shown. Currently, stereolithography is the most promising approach for routine creation of microfluidic structures, but several approaches under development also have potential. Microfluidic 3D printing is still in an early stage, similar to where polydimethylsiloxane was two decades ago. With additional work to advance printer hardware and software control, expand and improve resin and printing material selections, and realize additional applications for 3D printed devices, we foresee 3D printing becoming the dominant microfluidic fabrication method.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document