The causal impact of rape myth acceptance on men's rape proclivity: comparing sexually coercive and noncoercive men

2005 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 819-828 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerd Bohner ◽  
Christopher I. Jarvis ◽  
Friederike Eyssel ◽  
Frank Siebler
2006 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Friederike Eyssel ◽  
Gerd Bohner ◽  
Frank Siebler

Previous research has shown that information about others’ rape myth acceptance (RMA) affects men’s rape proclivity ( Bohner, Siebler, & Schmelcher, 2006 ). By varying both the level (low vs. high) and format (norm vs. anchor) of such information, different explanations for this effect were investigated. After reporting their own RMA, 117 male participants either read about others’ allegedly low vs. high RMA responses (norm conditions), or estimated if others’ responses were higher or lower than an “arbitrary” low vs. high value (anchor conditions). Later, participants indicated their rape proclivity (RP). Results show that the level of others’ RMA significantly affected participants’ self-reported RP, independent of information format. Furthermore, self-reported RMA and RP were positively correlated. Implications for future research are discussed.


2004 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 427-442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Chiroro ◽  
Gerd Bohner ◽  
G. Tendayi Viki ◽  
Christopher I. Jarvis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia Xue ◽  
Gang Fang ◽  
Hui Huang ◽  
Naixue Cui ◽  
Karin V. Rhodes ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document