scholarly journals When beggars are choosers-How nesting of a solitary bee is affected by temporal dynamics of pollen plants in the landscape

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 5777-5791 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna S. Persson ◽  
Florence Mazier ◽  
Henrik G. Smith
1997 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 205-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antti Pekkarinen

Evolution of flower specialization in bees, the concepts of poly-, oligo- andmonolecty are reviewed. About 60 species recorded in the area of Finland and Sweden are regarded as oligolectic. The proportions of oligoleges among all pollen-collecting bee species are about 30 percent in alarge area of central and Northern Europe. The proportion is about 15 percent in the northern boreal area of Finland and Sweden, where the percentage of polylectic bumblebees is much greater than in more southern areas. Of the solitary bee species recorded in Finland and Sweden, 25 arc regarded as narrow oligoleges, of which 6 species collect pollen from Campanula and 5 from Salix. Eusocial Bombus consobrinus is regarded as a facultative narrow oligolege of Aconitum septentrionale and, apparently, this bee species is the only oligolege in northern Europe, whose distribution completely covers that of the pollen plant. The distribution limits of some narrow oligoleges (e.9. Eucera longicornis and Andrena hattorfiana) approximately follow certain frequencies of their principal pollen plants (lathyrus pratensis and Knautia, respectively). Of the oligolectic bee species in Finland, 32 occur on the lists of threatened species of England, southwestern Germany or Poland. Records of E. longicornis and A. hattorfiana from various periods are given as examples of the decline of oligolectic bees in Finland during recent decades.


Author(s):  
Thomas Kleinsorge ◽  
Gerhard Rinkenauer

In two experiments, effects of incentives on task switching were investigated. Incentives were provided as a monetary bonus. In both experiments, the availability of a bonus varied on a trial-to-trial basis. The main difference between the experiments relates to the association of incentives to individual tasks. In Experiment 1, the association of incentives to individual tasks was fixed. Under these conditions, the effect of incentives was largely due to reward expectancy. Switch costs were reduced to statistical insignificance. This was true even with the task that was not associated with a bonus. In Experiment 2, there was a variable association of incentives to individual tasks. Under these conditions, the reward expectancy effect was bound to conditions with a well-established bonus-task association. In conditions in which the bonus-task association was not established in advance, enhanced performance of the bonus task was accompanied by performance decrements with the task that was not associated with a bonus. Reward expectancy affected mainly the general level of performance. The outcome of this study may also inform recently suggested neurobiological accounts about the temporal dynamics of reward processing.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Leonard ◽  
N. Ferjan Ramirez ◽  
C. Torres ◽  
M. Hatrak ◽  
R. Mayberry ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew G. Wisniewski ◽  
Barbara A. Church ◽  
Estella H. Liu ◽  
Eduardo Mercado

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Adam ◽  
Selas Jennings ◽  
Thamar Bovendeerdt ◽  
Pascal Van Gerven ◽  
Petra Hurks

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanne Schevernels ◽  
Ruth Krebs ◽  
Liesbet Van der Borght ◽  
Carsten Boehler

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document