The effect of visual deprivation in the rat on transfer effects after form discrimination training

1978 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard C. Tees ◽  
Yvonne Bruinsma ◽  
Glenda Midgley
Keyword(s):  
Discrimination Training ◽  
Visual Deprivation ◽  
Transfer Effects ◽  
Form Discrimination

The Performance of Aphasics on Automated Visuo-Perceptual Discrimination, Training, and Transfer Tasks

1965 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beth Rosenberg
Keyword(s):  
Discrimination Training ◽  
Transfer Test ◽  
Training Programs ◽  
Perceptual Discrimination ◽  
Form Discrimination ◽  
Verbal Aspect ◽  
Test Items ◽  
Language Behavior ◽  
Verbal Test ◽  
Transfer Tasks

The ability of 24 aphasics to make the perceptualdiscriminations, presumed to be basic to reading, was assessed and trained in automated fashion. Five training programs utilized forms abstracted as those necessary to compose the symbols of the English (Modern European) alphabet, and employed them in shape, up-down, and right-left discrimination tasks. A verbal transfer test was composed of sets of words, nonsense syllables, and individual letters. Data from the aphasic patients indicated that the training programs were effective in improving the latency of the discrimination response and that this improvement was manifested in general transfer to verbal test items. Training and transfer gains were maintained for at least a week after training. The results are interpreted as offering support for the view that form discrimination is a basic factor in at least the visual verbal aspect of language behavior. They also indicate that it is possible to design effective automated training procedures for use with patients who have frequently been considered untrainable.

Nonspecific transfer effects of discrimination training in the rat.

1971 ◽  
Vol 74 (1, Pt.1) ◽  
pp. 96-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
David R. Thomas ◽  
James T. Miller ◽  
John G. Svinicki
Keyword(s):  
Discrimination Training ◽  
Transfer Effects

Orosensory Perception, Speech Production, and Deafness

1973 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 257-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milo E. Bishop ◽  
Robert L. Ringel ◽  
Arthur S. House
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Speech Production ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Normal Hearing ◽  
The Other ◽  
Functional Disorders ◽  
Form Discrimination ◽  
School Subjects ◽  
Oral Form ◽  
Similarities And Differences

The oral form-discrimination abilities of 18 orally educated and oriented deaf high school subjects were determined and compared to those of manually educated and oriented deaf subjects and normal-hearing subjects. The similarities and differences among the responses of the three groups were discussed and then compared to responses elicited from subjects with functional disorders of articulation. In general, the discrimination scores separated the manual deaf from the other two groups, particularly when differences in form shapes were involved in the test. The implications of the results for theories relating orosensory-discrimination abilities are discussed. It is postulated that, while a failure in oroperceptual functioning may lead to disorders of articulation, a failure to use the oral mechanism for speech activities, even in persons with normal orosensory capabilities, may result in poor performance on oroperceptual tasks.

Secondary Transfer Effect of Contact

2009 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 55-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas F. Pettigrew
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Dissonance ◽  
Experimental Research ◽  
Intergroup Contact ◽  
Transfer Effect ◽  
Evaluative Conditioning ◽  
Transfer Effects ◽  
Secondary Transfer ◽  
Primary Reduction

This paper reviews the evidence for a secondary transfer effect of intergroup contact. Following a contact’s typical primary reduction in prejudice toward the outgroup involved in the contact, this effect involves a further, secondary reduction in prejudice toward noninvolved outgroups. Employing longitudinal German probability samples, we found that significant secondary transfer effects of intergroup contact exist, but they were limited to specific outgroups that are similar to the contacted outgroup in perceived stereotypes, status or stigma. Since the contact-prejudice link is bidirectional, the effect is inflated when prior prejudice reducing contact is not controlled. The strongest evidence derives from experimental research. Both cognitive (dissonance) and affective (evaluative conditioning) explanations for the effect are offered.

Pattern of Near Transfer Effects Following Working Memory Training With a Dual N-Back Task

2017 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 240-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Soveri ◽  
Eric P. A. Karlsson ◽  
Otto Waris ◽  
Petra Grönholm-Nyman ◽  
Matti Laine
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Composite Score ◽  
Memory Training ◽  
Interference Control ◽  
Transfer Effects ◽  
Near Transfer ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Transfer Tasks ◽  
Back Task

Abstract. In a randomized controlled trial, we investigated the pattern of near transfer effects of working memory (WM) training with an adaptive auditory-visuospatial dual n-back training task in healthy young adults. The results revealed significant task-specific transfer to an untrained single n-back task, and more general near transfer to a WM updating composite score plus a nearly significant effect on a composite score measuring interference control in WM. No transfer effects were seen on Active or Passive WM composites. The results are discussed in the light of cognitive versus strategy-related overlap between training and transfer tasks.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document