scholarly journals A Phase I Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Cabotegravir in Adults With Severe Renal Impairment and Healthy Matched Control Participants

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 674-681 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ridhi Parasrampuria ◽  
Susan L. Ford ◽  
Yu Lou ◽  
Caifeng Fu ◽  
Kalpana K. Bakshi ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
pp. 407
Author(s):  
Lieve Vandeplassche ◽  
Smith ◽  
Mannaert ◽  
Verhaeghe ◽  
Kerstens ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 58 (11) ◽  
pp. 6471-6476 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Flanagan ◽  
S. L. Minassian ◽  
D. Morris ◽  
R. Ponnuraj ◽  
T. C. Marbury ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTTwo open-label, single-dose, parallel-group studies were conducted to characterize the pharmacokinetics of the novel antibacterial tedizolid and the safety of tedizolid phosphate, its prodrug, in renally or hepatically impaired subjects. Tedizolid pharmacokinetics in subjects with severe renal impairment without dialysis support was compared with that of matched control subjects with normal renal function. Effects of hemodialysis on tedizolid pharmacokinetics were determined in a separate cohort of subjects undergoing long-term hemodialysis. Effects of hepatic impairment on tedizolid pharmacokinetics were determined in subjects with moderate or severe hepatic impairment and compared with those of matched control subjects with normal hepatic function. Each participant received a single oral (hepatic impairment) or intravenous (renal impairment) dose of tedizolid phosphate at 200 mg; hemodialysis subjects received two doses (separated by 7 days), before and after dialysis, in a crossover fashion. The pharmacokinetics of tedizolid was similar in subjects with severe renal impairment and controls (∼8% lower area under the concentration-time curve [AUC], with a nearly identical peak concentration) and in subjects undergoing hemodialysis before and after tedizolid phosphate administration (∼9% lower AUC, with a 15% higher peak concentration); <10% of the dose was removed during 4 h of hemodialysis. Tedizolid pharmacokinetics was only minimally altered in subjects with moderate or severe hepatic impairment; the AUC was increased approximately 22% and 34%, respectively, compared with that of subjects in the control group. Tedizolid phosphate was generally well tolerated in all participants. These results suggest that tedizolid phosphate dose adjustments are not necessary in patients with any degree of renal or hepatic impairment. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration numbers NCT01452828 [renal study] and NCT01431833 [hepatic study].)


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 5572-5572 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng Jin ◽  
Michelle Robeson ◽  
Huafeng Zhou ◽  
Grace Hisoire ◽  
Srini Ramanathan

Abstract Abstract 5572 Background Idelalisib (IDELA) is a potent competitive inhibitor of the ATP binding site of the PI3K p110δ catalytic domain, which has been shown to be prominently expressed in cells of hematopoietic origin. Pharmacokinetics of IDELA and its major metabolite GS-563117 have been assessed in a number of clinical studies in healthy subjects and patients with hematologic malignancies. IDELA is metabolized primarily by aldehyde oxidase to form GS-563117 and to a lesser extent by CYP3A and UGT1A4. Based on a human mass balance study, renal elimination plays a minor role on elimination of IDELA (∼ 15% of dose excreted in urine). The objective of the present study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety of IDELA and GS-563117 in subjects with severe renal impairment following administration of a single oral dose of IDELA. Methods Subjects with severe renal impairment (RI) (eGFR 15 – 29 ml/min) and healthy controls (eGFR ≥ 80 ml/min) matched for age, gender, and body mass index received IDELA 150 mg single dose. Blood and urine samples for IDELA and GS-563117 were collected over 6 days post-dose and were measured using a validated LC/MS/MS method. The ratio and 90% confidence interval of the least squares geometric means of PK exposure parameters in the renal impairment group versus matched controls were calculated, with clinically relevant exposure change defined as ≥ two-fold increase. Safety assessments were performed throughout the study. Results A total of 12 subjects were enrolled in the study. The majority of subjects were female, white, and of nonHispanic/Latino ethnicity, and the median age was similar between the 2 groups (65 years of age for the severe group and 63 years for the healthy control group). Study treatments were generally well tolerated. Overall, 6 of 12 subjects (50.0%; 1 subject with severe renal impairment and 5 healthy matched control subjects) reported a total of 10 AEs; all were Grade 1 (mild) in severity. The most frequently reported AE was headache followed by nausea. No clinically significant abnormal changes were observed in vital signs (temperature, pulse, blood pressure, respiratory rate) and ECG results from baseline. Single oral doses of IDELA 150 mg were well tolerated. Following single oral administration of IDELA 150 mg, IDELA AUClast, AUCinf, and Cmax geometric least-squares mean ratio were 127%, 127%, and 105%, respectively, between subjects with severe renal impairment relative to matched control subjects (Table 1). Consistently, GS-563117 AUClast, AUCinf, and Cmax geometric least-squares mean ratio were 124%, 124%, and 96%, respectively, between subjects with severe renal impairment relative to matched control subjects. These minimal changes observed in IDELA and GS-563117 exposure in severe renal impairment vs matched control subjects are not considered to be clinically meaningful. There were no relevant relationships between IDELA or GS-563117 exposures and baseline estimated creatinine clearance. Conclusion There were no clinically relevant differences in the pharmacokinetics of IDELA or its primary metabolite GS563117 between subjects with severe renal impairment and matched healthy control subjects following a single oral dose of IDELA 150 mg. Dose adjustments for IDELA are not considered necessary in subjects with mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment following oral administration. Single oral doses of IDELA 150 mg were well tolerated. Disclosures: Jin: Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Robeson:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhou:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hisoire:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ramanathan:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership.


2014 ◽  
Vol 77 (3) ◽  
pp. 498-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Isambert ◽  
Jean Pierre Delord ◽  
Jean Marc Tourani ◽  
Pierre Fumoleau ◽  
Alain Ravaud ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Karthick Vishwanathan ◽  
Inmaculada Sanchez‐Simon ◽  
Bhumsuk Keam ◽  
Nicolas Penel ◽  
Maria Miguel‐Luken ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 1037-1044 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.D. Galsky ◽  
L.H. Camacho ◽  
E.G. Chiorean ◽  
D. Mulkerin ◽  
D.S. Hong ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document