scholarly journals A multicenter, phase I, pharmacokinetic study of osimertinib in cancer patients with normal renal function or severe renal impairment

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Karthick Vishwanathan ◽  
Inmaculada Sanchez‐Simon ◽  
Bhumsuk Keam ◽  
Nicolas Penel ◽  
Maria Miguel‐Luken ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Function ◽  
Renal Impairment ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Study ◽  
Normal Renal Function ◽  
Severe Renal Impairment ◽  
Multicenter Phase

scholarly journals Pharmacokinetics of lamivudine in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients with renal dysfunction.

1996 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 1514-1519 ◽  
Author(s):  
A E Heald ◽  
P H Hsyu ◽  
G J Yuen ◽  
P Robinson ◽  
P Mydlow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Human Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
Renal Function ◽  
Renal Impairment ◽  
Normal Renal Function ◽  
Severe Renal Impairment ◽  
Moderate Renal Impairment ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Parameters ◽  
Geometric Means ◽  
Immunodeficiency Virus

The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and pharmacokinetics of lamivudine (3TC), a nucleoside analog that has shown potent in vitro and recent in vivo activity against human immunodeficiency virus. Sixteen human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients, six with normal renal function (creatinine clearance [CLCR], > or = 60 ml/min), four with moderate renal impairment (CLCR, 10 to 40 ml/min), and six with severe renal impairment (CLCR, < 10 ml/min), were enrolled in the study. After an overnight fast, patients were administered 300 mg of 3TC orally. Blood was obtained before 3TC administration and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, and 48 h afterward. Timed urine collections were performed for patients able to produce urine. Serum and urine were assayed for 3TC by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by using standard noncompartmental techniques. The peak concentration of 3TC increased with decreasing renal function; geometric means were 2,524, 3,538, and 5,684 ng/ml for patients with normal renal function, moderate renal impairment, and severe renal impairment, respectively. The terminal half-life also increased with decreasing renal function; geometric means were 11.5, 14.1, and 20.7 h for patients with normal renal function, moderate renal impairment, and severe renal impairment, respectively. Both oral and renal clearances were linearly correlated with CLCR. A 300-mg dose of 3TC was well tolerated by all three patient groups. The pharmacokinetics of 3TC is profoundly affected by impaired renal function. Dosage adjustment, by either dose reduction or lengthening of the dosing interval, is warranted.

scholarly journals Pharmacokinetics of Telbivudine in Subjects with Various Degrees of Renal Impairment

2007 ◽  
Vol 51 (12) ◽  
pp. 4231-4235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-Jian Zhou ◽  
Suzanne Swan ◽  
William B. Smith ◽  
Thomas C. Marbury ◽  
Gloria Dubuc-Patrick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Function ◽  
Renal Impairment ◽  
Normal Renal Function ◽  
Severe Renal Impairment ◽  
Normal Function ◽  
Plasma Exposure ◽  
Mild Renal Impairment ◽  
Severe Impairment ◽  
Stage Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage

ABSTRACT This study evaluates the effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of telbivudine. Thirty-six subjects were assigned, on the basis of creatinine clearance (CLCR), to 1 of 5 renal function groups with 6 to 8 subjects per group: normal renal function; mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment; or end-stage renal disease [ESRD] requiring hemodialysis. Subjects received a single oral dose of telbivudine at 600 mg (normal function and mild impairment), 400 mg (moderate impairment), or 200 mg (severe impairment and ESRD); plasma and/or urine samples were collected over a 48-h period for pharmacokinetic analyses. Telbivudine was well tolerated by all subjects. The pharmacokinetics of 600 mg of telbivudine were comparable for subjects with mild renal impairment and normal renal function. Likewise, for subjects with moderate to severe impairment, including ESRD, reduced doses from 200 to 400 mg produced plasma exposure similar to that for subjects with normal renal function. These results indicate that the pharmacokinetics of telbivudine were dependent on renal function, especially for subjects with moderate to severe renal impairment or ESRD. Apparent total plasma clearance, renal clearance (CLR), and urinary excretion of telbivudine decreased as renal function deteriorated. A linear relationship was established between CLR and CLCR. In ESRD subjects, a routine 3.5- to 4-h hemodialysis session removed telbivudine from plasma at an extraction ratio of ∼45%, representing a ∼23% reduction in total exposure. These results suggest that while no adjustment of the telbivudine dose appears necessary for subjects with mild renal impairment, dose adjustment is warranted for those with moderate to severe renal impairment or ESRD in order to achieve optimal plasma exposure.

A 2-Part Phase I Study in Patients with Solid or Hematologic Malignancies: Dose Proportionality of Subcutaneous (SC) Azacitidine (AZA) and Pharmacokinetics of SC AZA in Patients with Severe Renal Impairment,

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3480-3480
Author(s):  
Eric Laille ◽  
Alain C. Mita ◽  
Sanjay Goel ◽  
Nashat Y. Gabrail ◽  
Joseph Schwarz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Function ◽  
Renal Impairment ◽  
Normal Renal Function ◽  
Severe Renal Impairment ◽  
Hematologic Malignancies ◽  
Dose Proportionality ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Post Dose ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
To Receive

Abstract Abstract 3480 Background: The recommended starting dose for all patients receiving SC AZA is 75 mg/m2 daily for 7 days in 28-day cycles. If no response is observed, the dose may be increased to 100 mg/m2. Conversely, if cytopenias do not adequately resolve between dosing cycles, AZA dose may be reduced. Similarly, because AZA and its metabolites are primarily excreted by the kidneys, patients with renal impairment may require monitoring for elevations of BUN or serum creatinine (cr), in which case the next AZA treatment cycle should be delayed until values return to baseline and the next AZA dose should be reduced by 50% (Vidaza® prescribing information, 2011). Currently, the pharmacokinetics (PK) of SC AZA in reduced (<75 mg/m2) or increased (100 mg/m2) doses, and AZA exposure at the recommended dose in patients with renal impairment, are unknown. Objectives: To assess the dose proportionality of AZA PK after single SC doses ranging from 25 to 100 mg/m2, and to determine the effect of renal impairment on AZA PK after single and multiple (5 days) SC doses of 75 mg/m2. Also, the safety and tolerability of AZA in patients with severe renal impairment were determined. Methods: This 2-part multicenter, randomized, open-label study included patients with solid or hematologic malignancies. Part 1 was a 4-treatment, parallel-group evaluation of the dose proportionality of SC AZA in patients with normal renal function (cr clearance [CLcr] >80 mL/min/1.73 m2, Cockcroft-Gault equation adjusted for body surface area). Patients were randomized to receive a single dose of 25-, 50-, 75-, or 100-mg/m2 SC AZA. Blood and urine samples were collected before dosing and at various time points up to 8 hours post-dose. The 75 mg/m2 dosing group in Part 1 received an additional 4 days of AZA treatment and blood and urine were collected from these patients on the same schedule on Day 5. For Part 2, patients with severe renal impairment (CLcr <30 mL/min/1.73 m2) received SC AZA 75 mg/m2 for 5 consecutive days. PK parameters were determined using non-compartmental methods. Patients could continue to receive treatment with AZA (75 mg/m2/d SC x 7d q 28 days) in an extension phase for up to 6 cycles (patients were followed for safety only). Results: At the time of this analysis, 21 patients were enrolled and were included in safety evaluations, with PK data available for 18 patients. At baseline, median ages of patients with normal renal function (n=17) or severe renal impairment (n=4) were 61 years (range: 38–76) and 71 years (range: 54–90), respectively. Of patients with normal renal function, 12 (70%) had solid tumors, 4 had MDS (RAEB-t [n=2], RA, RARS), and 1 had multiple myeloma. Of patients with severe renal impairment, 2 (50%) had solid tumors, 1 had CMML, and 1 had MDS (RA). In Part 1, 14 patients were randomized to either 25 mg/m2 (n=4), 50 mg/m2 (n=4), 75 mg/m2 (n=3), or 100 mg/m2 (n=3). Mean [±SD] AUC0-∞ in the 25-, 50-, 75-, and 100 mg/m2 dose groups were 490 [146], 895 [300], 1270 [480], and 1410 [212] ng*hr/mL, respectively. Preliminary results show AZA is dose proportional across the 25–100 mg/m2dose range (Figure 1). In Part 2, on Days 1 and 5 of 5 consecutive days of SC AZA administration, AZA was rapidly absorbed by patients with severe renal impairment, reaching Cmax within 0.75 hours post-dose. AZA concentration decreased thereafter in a pseudobiphasic manner (Figure 2). Similar profiles were observed in patients with normal renal function who received the same dose. Mean [±SD] AUC0-∞ values after a 75 mg/m2 SC AZA dose on Day 1 were 1270 [480] ng*hr/mL in patients with normal renal function and 1630 [913] ng*hr/mL in patients with severely impaired renal function. On Day 5, mean AUC0-∞ values were 901 [92] and 1280 [728] ng*hr/mL, respectively. Similar observations were noted for Cmax. No accumulation of AZA was noted on Day 5 in either group. High inter-patient variability was noted in both groups (% coefficient of variation up to ∼82%). Patients with or without renal impairment did not show unusual or unexpected adverse events. Conclusions: AZA is dose-proportional over the 25–100 mg/m2 dosing range. PK parameters from patients with severe renal impairment treated with multiple doses of AZA 75 mg/m2 SC were comparable to those obtained from patients with normal renal function. Treatment with AZA 75 mg/m2 SC over multiple days was safe and well tolerated in this small group of patients with normal renal function or severe renal impairment. Disclosures: Laille: Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Goel:Celgene: Research Funding. Schwarz:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Beach:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Integrative assessment of the effect of renal function on ribociclib treatment and dose recommendation in advanced breast cancer patients.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13037-e13037
Author(s):  
Yan Ji ◽  
Vitaly Yartsev ◽  
Yingbo Wang ◽  
Michelle Quinlan ◽  
Paolo Serra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Function ◽  
Steady State ◽  
Renal Impairment ◽  
Normal Renal Function ◽  
Severe Renal Impairment ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Moderate Renal Impairment ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Integrative Assessment

e13037 Background: Ribociclib is an orally administered CDK4/6 inhibitor used in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) to treat women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor-2–negative advanced breast cancer (ABC). An integrative assessment was conducted to evaluate the effect of renal function on the pharmacokinetics (PK), efficacy and safety of ribociclib. Methods: To assess the effect of mild and moderate renal impairment, a subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate PK parameters of ribociclib following oral administration of 600 mg QD 3 weeks on/1 week off in two Phase 1/2 and one Phase 3 clinical trials. Steady-state PK exposures in ABC patients at the 600 mg dose was estimated by a population PK model developed based on a pooled dataset from five Phase 1 to 3 trials and were compared by renal function. Efficacy and safety were also analyzed by renal function in a Phase 2 and three Phase 3 trials in ABC patients. The effect of severe renal impairment on ribociclib PK was assessed in a Phase I study in non-cancer subjects following a single oral 400 mg dose. Results: PK analyses in cancer patients showed that both single-dose and steady-state exposure of ribociclib at the 600 mg dose in patients with mild or moderate renal impairment were comparable to patients with normal renal function. Estimated steady-state PK exposure in patients with mild or moderate renal impairment is also comparable to patients with normal renal function. The primary efficacy results of progression free survival (PFS) and the safety profiles were comparable across renal-function cohorts in ABC patients. In non-cancer subjects administered a single oral dose of 400 mg, ribociclib AUCinf and Cmax increased 2.67- and 2.30-fold in subjects with severe renal impairment, respectively, compared to subjects with normal renal function. Conclusions: PK, efficacy and safety of ribociclib are consistent across patients with normal renal function, mild or moderate renal impairment. Hence, no dose adjustment is required in mild or moderate renal impaired patients. Severe renal impaired patients are recommended to have a reduced dose based on PK data in non-cancer subjects.

scholarly journals Rivaroxaban dosing in patients with atrial fibrillation: results from the RIVER registry – is dosing according to renal function appropriate?

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A.J Camm ◽  
S Virdone ◽  
K.A.A Fox ◽  
K.S Pieper ◽  
J Beyer-Westendorf ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Renal Function ◽  
Renal Impairment ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Cardiovascular Mortality ◽  
Normal Renal Function ◽  
Severe Renal Impairment ◽  
Real Life ◽  
High Dose ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Introduction Rivaroxaban is recommended as an option for anticoagulation in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) with one or more risk factors for stroke. The approved/recommended rivaroxaban dose for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is solely based on renal function: 20 mg once daily (od) for patients with a creatinine clearance [CrCl] ≥50 ml/min and 15 mg od in patients with CrCl 15–49 mL/min). Purpose To assess the patterns of rivaroxaban prescription as per the creatinine clearances levels and to assess the impact of the rivaroxaban dosing on the rate of events at 2-year follow-up in patients with AF. Methods RIVaroxaban Evaluation in Real Life setting (RIVER) is a prospective international registry of patients with newly diagnosed non-valvular AF treated with rivaroxaban for the prevention of thromboembolic stroke and at least one investigator-determined risk factor for stroke. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were obtained through Cox proportional-hazard model. Results Among 3402 patients with normal renal function (CrCl ≥50 mL/min), 82.1% were prescribed the recommended rivaroxaban dose of 20 mg (od) at baseline. Among 524 patients with moderate or severe renal impairment (CrCl 15–50 mL/min), 55.3% patients received rivaroxaban 15 mg (od), 39.9% received 20 mg (od) and 4.2% 10 mg (od). Non-recommended dosing was rare in patients younger than 70 (13.5%) but more frequent in older patients (28.8%). Non-recommended low dosing was more frequent in Asians (38.9%), compared to non-Asian patients (13.8%). Regarding clinical outcomes, adjusted hazards ratios (HR, presented with 95% confidence intervals) showed that the non-recommended low dosing (&lt;20 mg od) was associated with higher risk of non-cardiovascular mortality (HR 2.09 (1.16–3.77)) in patients with normal renal function. The non-recommended high dosing (&gt;15 mg od) was associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR 0.63 (0.42–0.93)) and cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.32 (0.13–0.77)) and higher risk of major bleeding (HR 2.86 (1.49–5.50)) in patients with moderate to severe renal impairment (figure 1 and 2). Conclusion In patients with normal renal function, non-recommended low dose rivaroxaban was associated with increased cardiovascular mortality without reducing the risk of major bleeding compared to recommended dosing. In patients with CrCl &lt;50 ml/min, non-recommended high dose rivaroxaban was associated with reduced cardiovascular mortality but at the cost of increased major bleeding. These observational data largely support the reduction of rivaroxaban dosing according to renal function but educational strategies are needed to ensure that rivaroxaban is used appropriately. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): This work was supported by an unrestricted research grant from Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany, to TRI, London, UK, which sponsors the RIVER registry. This work is supported by KANTOR CHARITABLE FOUNDATION for the Kantor-Kakkar Global Centre for Thrombosis Science.

scholarly journals 1324. Target Attainment of Exebacase, a First-In-Class Antibacterial Lysin, to Determine Optimal Doses for Adult Patients with Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) Bloodstream Infections (Bacteremia) Including Endocarditis

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S673-S673
Author(s):  
Parviz Ghahramani ◽  
Tatiana Khariton ◽  
Joannellyn Chiu ◽  
Cara Cassino
Keyword(s):  
Renal Function ◽  
Renal Impairment ◽  
Normal Renal Function ◽  
Healthy Subjects ◽  
Severe Renal Impairment ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Compartment Model ◽  
Volume Of Distribution ◽  
Target Attainment

Abstract Background Exebacase, a novel, antibacterial direct lytic agent for the treatment of S. aureus bacterimia and endocarditis, studied in Phase 1 and 2 trials, demonstrated potential to improve clinical outcomes when used in addition to conventional antibiotics. Objectives were to develop population PK (PPK) model and perform target attainment (TA) simulations to determine optimal clinical doses. Methods PPK model was developed with data from 72 patients receiving Exebacase, in addition to the standard of care, as single 2-hr infusion of 0.25 mg/kg (0.12 mg/kg for patients with creatinine clearance (CrCL) &lt; 60 mL/min). PPK model was used for TA simulations of various IV regimens. Results 3-compartment model best fit the data, parameters were well estimated (CL=4.2 L/hr (RSE=5.5%), Vc=4.5 L (RSE=8.2%)). Total volume of distribution (Vd) was 20.2 L. Values were lower than estimated previously in healthy subjects, CL=7.1 L/hr and Vd=27.7 L. CrCL was the only clinically meaningful covariate. Patients with moderate and severe renal impairment are expected to have 1.3 to 2-fold higher AUC0-24 or Cmax than patients with normal renal function. Age was statistically significant on peripheral clearance but was not clinically meaningful (≤4% effect on exposure). TA simulations were stratified by renal function across a range of fixed as well as weight-based doses (all simulated as 2-hr infusion). In patients with normal renal function or mild impairment, 18 mg dose result in Cmax and AUC0-24 of 1254 ng/mL and 3026 ng*hr/mL, respectively. In patients with moderate or severe renal impairment, 12 mg dose result in Cmax and AUC0-24 of 1107 ng/mL and 3099 ng*hr/mL, respectively. In ESRD patients including hemodialysis, 8 mg dose result in Cmax and AUC0-24 of 910 ng/mL and 3109 ng*hr/mL, respectively. These exposures place &gt;99% subjects above efficacious thresholds of AUC/MIC &gt;0.2 established in animals. Conclusion PPK model described exebacase PK in patients adequately. CL and Vd were estimated to be 40% and 17% lower, respectively, than healthy subjects. CrCL was the only clinically meaningful covariate requiring dose adjustment. TA assessments identified doses that achieve minimum efficacy target (AUC/MIC≥0.2) in &gt;99% of patients with S. aureus. Based on these simulations, fixed dosing schedule was recommended. Disclosures Parviz Ghahramani, PhD, PharmD, MSc, MBA, Consultant to ConatFect (Consultant) Tatiana Khariton, PhD, Consultant to ConatFect (Consultant) Joannellyn Chiu, PhD, Consultant to ConatFect (Consultant) Cara Cassino, MD, ContraFect Corporation (Employee)ContraFect Corporation (Employee)

scholarly journals Risk factors and co-morbidities associated with changes in renal function among antiretroviral treatment-naïve adults in South Africa: A chart review

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shirelle Assaram ◽  
Tivani P. Mashamba-Thompson ◽  
Nombulelo P. Magula
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
South Africa ◽  
Renal Function ◽  
Renal Impairment ◽  
Renal Disease ◽  
Normal Renal Function ◽  
Antiretroviral Treatment ◽  
Severe Renal Impairment ◽  
Long Term Outcomes

Introduction: Our systematic scoping review has demonstrated a research gap in antiretroviral treatment (ART) nephrotoxicity as well as in the long-term outcomes of renal function for patients on ART in South Africa. Bearing in mind the high prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in South Africa, this is of great concern.Objectives: To determine the risk factors and co-morbidities associated with changes in renal function in HIV-infected adults in South Africa.Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 350 ART-naïve adult patients attending the King Edward VIII HIV clinic, Durban, South Africa. Data were collected at baseline (pre-ART) and at six, 12, 18 and 24 months on ART. Renal function was assessed in the 24-month period using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation and was categorised into normal renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] ≥ 60), moderate renal impairment (eGFR 30–59), severe renal impairment (eGFR 15–29) and kidney failure (eGFR < 15 mL/min/1.73 m2). Generalised linear models for binary data were used to model the probability of renal impairment over the five time periods, controlling for repeated measures within participants over time. Risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported for each time point versus baseline.Results: The cohort was 64% female, and 99% were Black. The median age was 36 years. At baseline, 10 patients had hypertension (HPT), six had diabetes, 61 were co-infected with tuberculosis (TB) and 157 patients had a high body mass index (BMI) with 25.4% being categorised as overweight and 19.4% as obese. The majority of the patients (59.3%) were normotensive. At baseline, the majority of the patients (90.4%) had normal renal function (95% CI: 86% – 93%), 7.0% (CI: 5% – 10%) had moderate renal impairment, 1.3% (CI: 0% – 3%) had severe renal impairment and 1.3% (CI: 0% – 3%) had renal failure. As BMI increased by one unit, the risk of renal impairment increased by 1.06 (CI: 1.03–1.10) times. The association of HPT with abnormal renal function was found to be insignificant, p > 0.05. The vast majority of patients were initiated on tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) (90.6%), in combination with lamivudine (3TC) (100%) and either efavirenz (EFV) (56.6%) or nevirapine (NVP) (43.4%).Conclusion: This study reports a low prevalence of baseline renal impairment in HIV-infected ART-naïve outpatients. An improvement in renal function after the commencement of ART has been demonstrated in this population. However, the long-term outcomes of patients with HIV-related renal disease are not known.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document