Factors Affecting the Estimation of Gas Hydrate and Free Gas Saturation

2006 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 441-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiu-Juan WANG ◽  
Shi-Guo WU ◽  
Xue-Wei LIU
2005 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 803-810 ◽  
Author(s):  
José M. Carcione ◽  
Davide Gei ◽  
Giuliana Rossi ◽  
Gianni Madrussani

Geophysics ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
pp. N21-N32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Zillmer

The occurrence of gas hydrate or free gas in a porous medium changes the medium’s elastic properties. Explicit formulas for gas-hydrate or free-gas saturation of pore space on the basis of the Frenkel-Gassmann equations describe the elastic moduli and seismic velocities of a porous medium for low frequencies. A key assumption of the model is that either gas hydrate or free gas is present in the pore space in addition to water. Under this assumption, the method uses measured P- and S-wave velocities and bulk density along with estimates of the moduli and densities of the solid and fluid phases present to determine whether gas or hydrate is present. The method then determines the saturation level of either the gas or the hydrate. I apply the method to published velocity and density data from seismic studies at the antarctic Shetland margin and at the Storegga slide, offshore Norway, and to borehole log and core data from Ocean Drilling Program (ODP) Leg 164 at Blake Ridge, offshore South Carolina. A sensitivity analysis reveals that the standard deviations of the gas-hydrate and free-gas saturations reach 30%–70% of the saturations if the standard deviations of the P- and S-wave velocities and of the bulk density are [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], respectively. I conclude that a reliable quantification of gas hydrate and free gas can be achieved by seismic methods only if the seismic velocities and bulk density of the medium are determined with high accuracy from the measured data.


2001 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 200-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Umberta Tinivella ◽  
Jose M. Carcione

Geophysics ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. D169-D179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zijian Zhang ◽  
De-hua Han ◽  
Daniel R. McConnell

Hydrate-bearing sands and shallow nodular hydrate are potential energy resources and geohazards, and they both need to be better understood and identified. Therefore, it is useful to develop methodologies for modeling and simulating elastic constants of these hydrate-bearing sediments. A gas-hydrate rock-physics model based on the effective medium theory was successfully applied to dry rock, water-saturated rock, and hydrate-bearing rock. The model was used to investigate the seismic interpretation capability of hydrate-bearing sediments in the Gulf of Mexico by computing elastic constants, also known as seismic attributes, in terms of seismic interpretation, including the normal incident reflectivity (NI), Poisson’s ratio (PR), P-wave velocity ([Formula: see text]), S-wave velocity ([Formula: see text]), and density. The study of the model was concerned with the formation of gas hydrate, and, therefore, hydrate-bearing sediments were divided into hydrate-bearing sands, hydrate-bearing sands with free gas in the pore space, and shallow nodular hydrate. Although relations of hydrate saturation versus [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] are different between structures I and II gas hydrates, highly concentrated hydrate-bearing sands may be interpreted on poststack seismic amplitude sections because of the high NI present. The computations of elastic constant implied that hydrate-bearing sands with free gas could be detected with the crossplot of NI and PR from prestack amplitude analysis, and density may be a good hydrate indicator for shallow nodular hydrate, if it can be accurately estimated by seismic methods.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document