Entrepreneurial orientation and performance in private family firms: A configurational model

Author(s):  
Jonathan Bauweraerts
2014 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucía Garcés-Galdeano ◽  
Martín Larraza-Kintana ◽  
Carmen García-Olaverri ◽  
Marianna Makri

2007 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucia Naldi ◽  
Mattias Nordqvist ◽  
Karin Sjöberg ◽  
Johan Wiklund

This article focuses on risk taking as one important dimension of entrepreneurial orientation and its impact in family firms. Drawing on a sample of Swedish SMEs, we find that risk taking is a distinct dimension of entrepreneurial orientation in family firms and that it is positively associated with proactiveness and innovation. We also find that even if family firms do take risks while engaged in entrepreneurial activities, they take risk to a lesser extent than nonfamily firms. Moreover, and most importantly for our understanding of entrepreneurial orientation in family firms, we find that risk taking in family firms is negatively related to performance. Both theoretical and practical implications of our findings are provided.


2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ascensión Barroso Martínez ◽  
Ramón Sanguino Galván ◽  
Tomás M. Bañegil Palacios

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 174-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura J. Stanley ◽  
Remedios Hernández-Linares ◽  
María Concepción López-Fernández ◽  
Franz W. Kellermanns

Drawing on family firm heterogeneity research, we develop a typology of family firms using differences in family influence and firm life cycle. We offer hypotheses regarding the relationships between the different firm types and two important outcomes: Entrepreneurial orientation (EO) and performance. Applying latent profile analysis to a sample of 684 Spanish and Portuguese family firms using variables related to family influence (i.e., ownership, family CEO) and firm life cycle (i.e., generational management, size, and presence of board of directors), we find four family firm types, which differentially affect EO and performance. Implications of our findings for EO, family firm performance, and the development of family firm typologies are discussed.


Author(s):  
Remedios Hernández-Linares ◽  
María Concepción López-Fernández ◽  
Laura Victoria Fielden Burns

Although management literature mostly reports a positive association between entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance, it also recognizes that different business contexts may prompt different manifestations of entrepreneurial orientation. Considering that family firms constitute the backbone of most economies across the globe, and based on arguments from socioemotional wealth perspective, this research aims to examine the moderating effect of being a family firm on the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance. The empirical study is based on primary information obtained from the chief-executive-offices of 402 small and medium-enterprises (SMEs) from Portugal, a country located in southwestern Europe, and one that has been scantly investigated by the literature in the confluence between entrepreneurial orientation and family firms. Results show that the family firm status weakens the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and performance in the Portuguese SMEs.


Author(s):  
Ana M Moreno-Menéndez ◽  
Unai Arzubiaga ◽  
Vanessa Díaz-Moriana ◽  
José C Casillas

This article critically analyses entrepreneurial orientation (EO) in family firms after a major crisis, to investigate how firms with equal initial levels of EO reach different levels over time. Based on two alternative hypotheses (stability and convergence), we analysed whether the EO of family firms remains intact, strengthens, or weakens after a crisis. Based on an examination of a database of 151 family firms collected in 2004 and 2017, our findings reveal that compared to firms with higher pre-crisis EO levels, those with lower levels saw a larger increase post crisis. Furthermore, unlike the latter group, the former was able to maintain high pre-crisis levels even after the crisis. In addition, we also we found this relationship between pre-crisis and post-crisis EO levels to be influenced by two key periodic discontinuities, namely, organisational decline and generational change contingencies. These findings advance our understanding of temporal aspects of EO and heterogeneous entrepreneurial behaviour among family firms with significant implications for both theory and practice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document