An Analysis of Peer Feedback Exchanged in Group Supervision

2017 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 274-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward Wahesh ◽  
Gulsah Kemer ◽  
Ben T. Willis ◽  
Christopher D. Schmidt
2021 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 148-163
Author(s):  
Gulsah Kemer ◽  
Johana Rocha ◽  
Alyssa Reiter ◽  
Vanessa N. Dominguez ◽  
Yesim Giresunlu

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leon Bonde Larsen

Increased student uptake in the engineering programmes strains the time spent by researchers on supervision. At the same many students are challenged on their writing competences thus raising the demand for dedicated supervision. This combination threatens to lower the scientific quality of final projects and especially the written dissertations. In this work we first analyse the writing habits in a cohort of six students at different levels and from different programmes. Based on the analysis we identify two main problems: The students begin writing too late in the project and supervisors need more time to give feedback. After analysing challenges and resources we review solutions from literature and propose a three phase model for the distribution of activities over the project period. We present a supervision strategy consisting of group supervision, peer feedback and pre-task lectures to mediate the identified problems. Finally we describe a teaching activity that we conducted for the aforementioned cohort aimed at mediating the identified problems and discuss the results.


2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mari Yoshikawa ◽  
Hiroyuki Moritani ◽  
Katsuyasu Nishii ◽  
Yoshiko Ito ◽  
Kikuyo Aoki

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document