scholarly journals Surface anatomy of major anatomical landmarks of the neck in an adult population

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 781-787 ◽  
Author(s):  
MASROOR BADSHAH ◽  
ROGER SOAMES ◽  
MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM ◽  
MUHAMMAD JAFFAR KHAN ◽  
ADNAN KHAN
2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 227-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masroor Badshah ◽  
Roger Soames ◽  
Muhammad Jaffar Khan ◽  
Muhammad Ibrahim ◽  
Adnan Khan

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 330-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin-Hua Shen ◽  
Hua-Dan Xue ◽  
Yu Chen ◽  
Man Wang ◽  
S. Ali Mirjalili ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 133 (2) ◽  
pp. 546-555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun-Sik Dho ◽  
Young Jae Kim ◽  
Kwang Gi Kim ◽  
Sung Hwan Hwang ◽  
Kyung Hyun Kim ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVEThe aim of this study was to analyze the positional effect of MRI on the accuracy of neuronavigational localization for posterior fossa (PF) lesions when the operation is performed with the patient in the prone position.METHODSTen patients with PF tumors requiring surgery in the prone position were prospectively enrolled in the study. All patients underwent preoperative navigational MRI in both the supine and prone positions in a single session. Using simultaneous intraoperative registration of the supine and prone navigational MR images, the authors investigated the images’ accuracy, spatial deformity, and source of errors for PF lesions. Accuracy was determined in terms of differences in the ability of the supine and prone MR images to localize 64 test points in the PF by using a neuronavigation system. Spatial deformities were analyzed and visualized by in-house–developed software with a 3D reconstruction function and spatial calculation of the MRI data. To identify the source of differences, the authors investigated the accuracy of fiducial point localization in the supine and prone MR images after taking the surface anatomy and age factors into consideration.RESULTSNeuronavigational localization performed using prone MRI was more accurate for PF lesions than routine supine MRI prior to prone position surgery. Prone MRI more accurately localized 93.8% of the tested PF areas than supine MRI. The spatial deformities in the neuronavigation system calculated using the supine MRI tended to move in the posterior-superior direction from the actual anatomical landmarks. The average distance of the spatial differences between the prone and supine MR images was 6.3 mm. The spatial difference had a tendency to increase close to the midline. An older age (> 60 years) and fiducial markers adjacent to the cervical muscles were considered to contribute significantly to the source of differences in the positional effect of neuronavigation (p < 0.001 and p = 0.01, respectively).CONCLUSIONSThis study demonstrated the superior accuracy of neuronavigational localization with prone-position MRI during prone-position surgery for PF lesions. The authors recommend that the scan position of the neuronavigational MRI be matched with the surgical position for more precise localization.


2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (03) ◽  
pp. 121-123
Author(s):  
S. Shah ◽  
S. Koirala

Abstract Introduction: Cephalic Index and Prosopic Index are very useful anthropometric tool to find out racial and sexual differences and also give a clue to genetic transmission of inherited characteristics from parents to their offspring. Materials and Methods: A descriptive non-interventional cross-sectional study was conducted on normal undergraduate medical students of Nepalese origin from BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Nepal on September 2012. A total of 313 (male=186 and female=127) Nepalese young adult students with their ages ranging from 17-25 years were included for the study after taking permission from institutional ethical board and committee. All the measurements were carried out after careful palpation of the head for anatomical landmarks and measurements were taken to the nearest 1mm. Results obtained were presented as mean and standard deviation. Independent student t test and anova test was applied to find out the gender, geographical and ethnic differences. A “p” value of < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. Results: The head and face form of males were hyperbrachicephalic and mesoprosopic respectively and of females were mesocephalic and leptoprosopic respectively.The head and face form of Tibeto-Nepalese were hyperbrachicephalic and mesoprosopic; of Indigenous were brachiocepalic and mesoprosopic and of Indo-Nepalese were mesocephalic and leptoprosopic respectively. Conclusion: Thus the racial factor, gender, geographical and regional variations influences the craniofacial anthropometry especially head and faces form.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document