One-dose antibiotic prophylaxis against wound infection after appendicectomy: A randomized trial of clindamycin, cefazolin sodium and a placebo

1979 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 193-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. A. Donovan ◽  
D. Ellis ◽  
D. Gatehouse ◽  
G. Little ◽  
R. Grimley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Cefazolin Sodium

Outcome of Short-Term and Long Term Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Colostomy Closure

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 43-48
Author(s):  
Md Jamal Saleh Uddin ◽  
Sukumar Chakrabarti ◽  
Md Shahidul Islam
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Anorectal Malformation ◽  
Hirschsprung's Disease ◽  
Hirschsprung’S Disease ◽  
Colostomy Closure ◽  
Term Therapy ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Sigmoid Colostomy

Background and Objectives: Antibiotic prophylaxis is a common practice in children undergoing colostomy closure for anorectal malformation, Hirschsprung's disease. Traditionally, antibiotics are given for unnecessarily longer period of time, which consumes scarce health resources having alternate efficient use. The present study was undertaken to compare the outcome between short-term and long-term antibiotic prophylaxis in colostomy closure. Materials & Methods: This randomized clinical trial was conducted in Dhaka Shishu Hospital, Dhaka over a period of 15 months from April 2001 to June 2002. Children admitted with anorectal malformation, Hirschsprung's disease for colostomy closures were the study population. However, immuno-compromised children or children already getting antibiotics were excluded from the study. A total of 46 such children were consecutively included and were randomly allocated to long-term group (n = 21) and short-term group (n = 25). The long-term group received antibiotic up to 5th postoperative day, while the short-term group received the same antibiotic up to 2nd postoperative day. Transverse colostomy was the main procedure employed in colostomy closure; however, a few patients required sigmoid colostomy. The outcome measures were incidence of wound infection, hospital stay and cost of treatment. Result: Majority of the children were between 1 - 5 years of age (75% in short-term and 50% in long-term group) followed by under 1 year (10% in short-term and 40% in long-term group) and > 5 years (15% in short-term and 10% in long-term group). The overall male to female ratio was 3:1. Majority (85%) of the patients in both long­term and short-term groups belonged to lower income group. Over half (52.2%) of the children had anorectal malformations (ARM) and the rest (47.8%) had Hirschsprung's disease (HD). Children were generally malnourished according to Gomez classification. Majority (91%) was operated on by transverse colostomy and few (9%) by sigmoid colostomy. Three patients in each group developed postoperative wound infection. Blood culture of none of these patients yielded growth of any organism, though wound swab culture did so in 5 cases out of 6 infected patients. In 2 cases, the organism was E.coli, in 2 cases, it was Pseudomonas and in one case Staph. aureus. Total cost of antibiotics in short-term therapy was less than 50% of that required in long-term therapy. The outcome in terms of recovery, complications and postoperative hospital stay was no different between groups. Conclusion: The study concluded that short-term antibiotic prophylaxis is as efficacious as long-term in preventing wound infection in patients with colostomy closure for anorectal malformation and Hirschsprung's disease. Short-term antibiotic prophylaxis is cost-effective Ibrahim Cardiac Med J 2014; 4(2): 43-48

scholarly journals POST OPERATIVE WOUND INFECTION

2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (02) ◽  
pp. 174-179
Author(s):  
AAMIR IJAZ ◽  
SUHAIL AMER
Keyword(s):  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Prophylactic Antibiotics ◽  
Postoperative Wound Infection ◽  
Wound Infections ◽  
Postoperative Wound ◽  
Lichtenstein Hernia Repair ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: The use of antibiotic prophylaxis during Lichtenstein inguinal hernia surgery is controversial, and no definitive guidelines are available in literature. Objective: To determine effects of prophylactic antibiotics in reducing the frequency of postoperative wound infection in Lichtenstein hernia repair. Study Design: Case control study. Setting: Surgical Unit II, Allied Hospital, Faisalabad. Duration: One year, between January 2007 and December 2007. Methods: Patients undergoing unilateral, primary inguinal hernia repairelectively with the Lichtenstein technique using polypropylene mesh were randomized to receive 1.0 g intravenous Cefazolin before the incision or an equal volume of placebo. Wound infection was defined according to the criteria of Centers for Disease Control and recorded. Results were assessed using chi-square test. Results: 100 patients were included in the study. Minimum age of patients in this study was 20 and maximum 75 years with a mean of 44.06 in group A and 44.84 in group B. The total number of wound infections was 7 (7%); 2 (4%) in the antibiotic prophylaxis group and 5 (10%) in the placebo group. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference in the number of wound infections in both groups (p value=0.240). Conclusions: We conclude that in Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair routine use of prophylactic antibiotics is not needed, as it does not significantly reduce the postoperative wound infection rates.

scholarly journals Antibiotic prophylaxis in ragged placental membranes: a prospective, multicentre, randomized trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hian Yan Voon ◽  
Jun Yan Pow ◽  
Lee Na Tan ◽  
Haris Njoo Suharjono ◽  
Wan Sim Teo
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Placental Membranes
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document