scholarly journals Comparative Metabolic Modeling of Multiple Sulfate‐reducing Prokaryotes Reveals Versatile Energy Conservation Mechanisms

Author(s):  
Wen‐Tao Tang ◽  
Tian‐Wei Hao ◽  
Guang‐Hao Chen
2014 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morgan N. Price ◽  
Jayashree Ray ◽  
Kelly M. Wetmore ◽  
Jennifer V. Kuehl ◽  
Stefan Bauer ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 360-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marine Schoeffler ◽  
Anne-Laure Gaudin ◽  
Fanny Ramel ◽  
Odile Valette ◽  
Yann Denis ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morgan Price ◽  
Jayashree Ray ◽  
Kelly M Wetmore ◽  
Jennifer V. Kuehl ◽  
Stefan Bauer ◽  
...  

Sulfate-reducing bacteria play major roles in the global carbon and sulfur cycles, but it remains unclear how reducing sulfate yields energy. To determine the genetic basis of energy conservation, we measured the fitness of thousands of pooled mutants ofDesulfovibrio alaskensisG20 during growth in 12 different combinations of electron donors and acceptors. We show that ion pumping by the ferredoxin:NADH oxidoreductase Rnf is required whenever substrate-level phosphorylation is not possible. The uncharacterized complex Hdr/flox-1 (Dde_1207:13) is sometimes important alongside Rnf and may perform an electron bifurcation to generate more reduced ferredoxin from NADH to allow further ion pumping. Similarly, during the oxidation of malate or fumarate, the electron-bifurcating transhydrogenase NfnAB-2 (Dde_1250:1) is important and may generate reduced ferredoxin to allow additional ion pumping by Rnf. During formate oxidation, the periplasmic [NiFeSe] hydrogenase HysAB is required, which suggests that hydrogen forms in the periplasm, diffuses to the cytoplasm, and is used to reduce ferredoxin, thus providing a substrate for Rnf. During hydrogen utilization, the transmembrane electron transport complex Tmc is important and may move electrons from the periplasm into the cytoplasmic sulfite reduction pathway. Finally, mutants of many other putative electron carriers ave no clear phenotype, which suggests that they are not important under our growth conditions.


1981 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 426-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul C. Stern ◽  
Gerald T. Gardner
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
pp. 50-64
Author(s):  
Kuladeep Kumar Sadevi ◽  
Avlokita Agrawal

With the rise in awareness of energy efficient buildings and adoption of mandatory energy conservation codes across the globe, significant change is being observed in the way the buildings are designed. With the launch of Energy Conservation Building Code (ECBC) in India, climate responsive designs and passive cooling techniques are being explored increasingly in building designs. Of all the building envelope components, roof surface has been identified as the most significant with respect to the heat gain due to the incident solar radiation on buildings, especially in tropical climatic conditions. Since ECBC specifies stringent U-Values for roof assembly, use of insulating materials is becoming popular. Along with insulation, the shading of the roof is also observed to be an important strategy for improving thermal performance of the building, especially in Warm and humid climatic conditions. This study intends to assess the impact of roof shading on building’s energy performance in comparison to that of exposed roof with insulation. A typical office building with specific geometry and schedules has been identified as base case model for this study. This building is simulated using energy modelling software ‘Design Builder’ with base case parameters as prescribed in ECBC. Further, the same building has been simulated parametrically adjusting the amount of roof insulation and roof shading simultaneously. The overall energy consumption and the envelope performance of the top floor are extracted for analysis. The results indicate that the roof shading is an effective passive cooling strategy for both naturally ventilated and air conditioned buildings in Warm and humid climates of India. It is also observed that a fully shaded roof outperforms the insulated roof as per ECBC prescription. Provision of shading over roof reduces the annual energy consumption of building in case of both insulated and uninsulated roofs. However, the impact is higher for uninsulated roofs (U-Value of 3.933 W/m2K), being 4.18% as compared to 0.59% for insulated roofs (U-Value of 0.33 W/m2K).While the general assumption is that roof insulation helps in reducing the energy consumption in tropical buildings, it is observed to be the other way when insulation is provided with roof shading. It is due to restricted heat loss during night.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document