Nitrate and nitrite reduction by liquid-membrane-encapsulated enzymes and whole cells

1979 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 1079-1079 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. R. Mohan ◽  
N. N. Li
1996 ◽  
Vol 34 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 355-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroaki Furumai ◽  
Hideki Tagui ◽  
Kenji Fujita

Two laboratory-scale biological filters were operated to investigate the effects of alkalinity and pH on removal of nitrate and nitrite in sulfur denitrification filter processes. The concentration of sodium bicarbonate in the feed media was changed from 120 to 240 mg/l during about 3 months in a filter (Run A). The other filter was initially fed with 300 mg/l and then with 240 mg/l (Run B). The performance of the filter was monitored by measuring pH, nitrate, nitrite, sulfate, alkalinity, and thiosulfate. Nitrate concentration in effluent rapidly decreased to lower levels within several days for both filters after inoculation of enrichment culture of sulfur denitrifiers. However there was a large difference in removal of nitrite. When rapid removal of nitrate took place, nitrite accumulation was observed and remained while the bicarbonate concentration was 120 and 150 mg/l. On the other hand the nitrite accumulation disappeared when more bicarbonate (240 and 300 mg/l) was supplied. The experimental results indicated that the nitrite accumulation was closely related to pH condition and alkalinity level in the filter. The stable data of effluent water quality for 5 cases were collected and the relationship discussed between nitrite concentration and pH in effluents. The relationship indicated a strong pH dependency on nitrite accumulation below pH of 7.4. The pH condition around 7 is not so inhibitory to biological activity. Therefore, the pH within the biofilm would be low enough to suppress the nitrite reduction by sulfur denitrifiers, while the pH in effluent was not in the inhibitory range. It was recommended to keep the pH higher than 7.4 to prevent nitrite accumulation in the sulfur denitrification filter.


2020 ◽  
Vol 548 ◽  
pp. 119691
Author(s):  
Rosanna Margalef-Marti ◽  
Raúl Carrey ◽  
José Antonio Benito ◽  
Vicenç Marti ◽  
Albert Soler ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
LEONARD BEEVERS ◽  
RICHARD H. HAGEMAN

2016 ◽  
Vol 82 (14) ◽  
pp. 4190-4199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tekle Tafese Fida ◽  
Chuan Chen ◽  
Gloria Okpala ◽  
Gerrit Voordouw

ABSTRACTNitrate reduction to nitrite in oil fields appears to be more thermophilic than the subsequent reduction of nitrite. Concentrated microbial consortia from oil fields reduced both nitrate and nitrite at 40 and 45°C but only nitrate at and above 50°C. The abundance of thenirSgene correlated with mesophilic nitrite reduction activity.ThaueraandPseudomonaswere the dominant mesophilic nitrate-reducing bacteria (mNRB), whereasPetrobacterandGeobacilluswere the dominant thermophilic NRB (tNRB) in these consortia. The mNRBThauerasp. strain TK001, isolated in this study, reduced nitrate and nitrite at 40 and 45°C but not at 50°C, whereas the tNRBPetrobactersp. strain TK002 andGeobacillussp. strain TK003 reduced nitrate to nitrite but did not reduce nitrite further from 50 to 70°C. Testing of 12 deposited pure cultures of tNRB with 4 electron donors indicated reduction of nitrate in 40 of 48 and reduction of nitrite in only 9 of 48 incubations. Nitrate is injected into high-temperature oil fields to prevent sulfide formation (souring) by sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB), which are strongly inhibited by nitrite. Injection of cold seawater to produce oil creates mesothermic zones. Our results suggest that preventing the temperature of these zones from dropping below 50°C will limit the reduction of nitrite, allowing more effective souring control.IMPORTANCENitrite can accumulate at temperatures of 50 to 70°C, because nitrate reduction extends to higher temperatures than the subsequent reduction of nitrite. This is important for understanding the fundamentals of thermophilicity and for the control of souring in oil fields catalyzed by SRB, which are strongly inhibited by nitrite.


2011 ◽  
Vol 435 (3) ◽  
pp. 743-753 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Gates ◽  
Victor M. Luque-Almagro ◽  
Alan D. Goddard ◽  
Stuart J. Ferguson ◽  
M. Dolores Roldán ◽  
...  

The denitrifying bacterium Paracoccus denitrificans can grow aerobically or anaerobically using nitrate or nitrite as the sole nitrogen source. The biochemical pathway responsible is expressed from a gene cluster comprising a nitrate/nitrite transporter (NasA), nitrite transporter (NasH), nitrite reductase (NasB), ferredoxin (NasG) and nitrate reductase (NasC). NasB and NasG are essential for growth with nitrate or nitrite as the nitrogen source. NADH serves as the electron donor for nitrate and nitrite reduction, but only NasB has a NADH-oxidizing domain. Nitrate and nitrite reductase activities show the same Km for NADH and can be separated by anion-exchange chromatography, but only fractions containing NasB retain the ability to oxidize NADH. This implies that NasG mediates electron flux from the NADH-oxidizing site in NasB to the sites of nitrate and nitrite reduction in NasC and NasB respectively. Delivery of extracellular nitrate to NasBGC is mediated by NasA, but both NasA and NasH contribute to nitrite uptake. The roles of NasA and NasC can be substituted during anaerobic growth by the biochemically distinct membrane-bound respiratory nitrate reductase (Nar), demonstrating functional overlap. nasG is highly conserved in nitrate/nitrite assimilation gene clusters, which is consistent with a key role for the NasG ferredoxin, as part of a phylogenetically widespread composite nitrate and nitrite reductase system.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document