scholarly journals Does double‐blind peer review reduce bias? Evidence from a top computer science conference

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mengyi Sun ◽  
Jainabou Barry Danfa ◽  
Misha Teplitskiy
Keyword(s):  
Computer Science ◽  
Peer Review ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Science Conference

scholarly journals Single-Blind and Double-Blind Peer Review: Effects on National Representation

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Meghana Kalavar ◽  
Arjun Watane ◽  
David Wu ◽  
Jayanth Sridhar ◽  
Prithvi Mruthyunjaya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
National Representation ◽  
Single Blind

scholarly journals Open, single-blind, double-blind: which peer review process do you prefer?

2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth C Moylan ◽  
Simon Harold ◽  
Ciaran O’Neill ◽  
Maria K Kowalczuk
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Single Blind

scholarly journals Peer-Review Declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 869 (1) ◽  
pp. 011003
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Preliminary Review ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Conference Series ◽  
Scientific Standards

Abstract All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Number of submissions received: 94 papers • Number of submissions sent for review: 94 papers • Number of submissions accepted: 74 papers • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 78.72% • Average number of reviews per paper: 3 papers • Total number of reviewers involved: 31 reviewers • Any additional info on review process: 1. Preliminary review 2. The papers passed the first review will be reviewed again from the following aspects: originality, innovation, technical soundness, and applicability Ilham Zulfahmi Email: [email protected] Universitas Syiah Kuala

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 905 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Research And Development ◽  
Peer Review ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Conference Management ◽  
Development Center ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Maximum Threshold

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer-reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind with the opportunity to resubmit after revisions • Conference submission management system: Microsoft’s Conference Management Toolkit (Microsoft CMT). The submission url is https://cmt3.research.microsoft.com/User/Login?ReturnUrl=%2FICSAE2021 • Number of submissions received: 224 • Number of submissions sent for review: 198 • Number of submissions accepted: 148 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): 66.07% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 18 • Any additional info on the review process: all papers were checked for its similarity using Turnitin, and 25% similar was set as maximum threshold. • Contact person for queries: Name: Prof. Sri Hartati Affiliation: Research and Development Center for Biotechnology and Biodiversity (P3BB) Universitas Sebelas Maret Email: [email protected]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document