Parietal Bone Thickness and Vascular Diameters in Adult Modern Humans: A Survey on Cranial Remains

2016 ◽  
Vol 299 (7) ◽  
pp. 888-896 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stanislava Eisová ◽  
Gizéh Rangel de Lázaro ◽  
Hana Píšová ◽  
Sofia Pereira-Pedro ◽  
Emiliano Bruner
2015 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 255-261
Author(s):  
D. K. Mahamad Iqbal ◽  
Vivek B. Amin ◽  
Rohan Mascarenhas ◽  
Akther Husain

Objective The objectives of this study were to determine the thickness of skull bones, namely frontal, parietal, and occipital bones in Class I, Class II, and Class III patients. Materials and Methods Three hundred subjects who reported to the Department of Orthodontics requiring orthodontic treatment within the age group 17-35 were selected for the study. They were subdivided into three groups of 100 each according to the skeletal and dental relation. Profile radiographs were taken and the tracings were then scanned, and uploaded to the MATLAB 7.6.0 (R 2008a) software. The total surface areas of the individual bones were estimated by the software, which represented the thickness of each bone. Result Frontal bone was the thickest in Class III malocclusion group and the thinnest in Class II malocclusion group. But the parietal and occipital bone thickness were not significant. During gender differentiation in Class I, malocclusion group frontal bone thickness was more in males than females, In Class II, malocclusion parietal bone thickness was more in males than females. No statistically significant difference exists between genders, in Class III malocclusion group. During inter-comparison, the frontal bone thickness was significant when compared with Class I and Class II malocclusion groups and Class II and Class III malocclusion groups. Conclusion The differences in skull thickness in various malocclusions can be used as an adjunct in diagnosis and treatment planning for orthodontic patients. It was found that the new method (MATLAB 7.6.0 [R 2008a] software) of measuring skull thickness was easier, faster, precise, and accurate.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Elsa V. Arocho-Quinones ◽  
Sean M. Lew ◽  
Andrew B. Foy

OBJECTIVEThe management of children with ping-pong skull fractures may include observation, nonsurgical treatments, or surgical intervention depending on the age, clinical presentation, imaging findings, and cosmetic appearance of the patient. There have been 16 publications on nonsurgical treatment using negative pressure with various devices. Herein, the authors report their experience with vacuum-assisted elevation of ping-pong skull fractures and evaluate the variables affecting procedural outcomes.METHODSThe authors performed a retrospective chart review of all ping-pong skull fractures treated via vacuum-assisted elevation at the Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin between 2013 and 2017. Data collected included patient age, head circumference, mode of injury, time to presentation, imaging findings, procedural details, treatment outcomes, and complications.RESULTSFour neonates and 5 infants underwent vacuum-assisted elevation of moderate to severe ping-pong skull fractures during the study period. Modes of injury included birth-related trauma, falls, and blunt trauma. All patients had normal neurological examination findings and no evidence of intracranial hemorrhage. All fractures were deemed severe enough to require elevation by the treating neurosurgeon. All fractures involved the parietal bone. Skull depressions ranged from 23 to 62 mm in diameter and from 4 to 14 mm in depth. Bone thickness ranged from 0.6 to 1.8 mm. The time from fracture to intervention ranged from 7 hours to 8 days. The Kiwi OmniCup vacuum delivery system was used in all cases. Negative pressures were increased sequentially to a maximum of 500 mm Hg. A greater number of sequential vacuum applications was required for patients with a skull thickness greater than 1 mm at the site of depression and for those undergoing treatment more than 72 hours from fracture onset. Successful fracture elevation was attained in 7 of 9 patients. Two patients required subsequent surgical elevation of their fractures. Postprocedure imaging studies revealed no evidence of complications.CONCLUSIONSIncreasing bone thickness and time from fracture onset to intervention appeared to be the greatest limiting factors to the successful elevation of moderate to severe ping-pong fractures via this vacuum-assisted approach. This procedure is a well-tolerated option that should be considered prior to performing an open repair in cases deemed to require fracture elevation. Future efforts will focus on larger-volume studies to better delineate inclusion and exclusion criteria, and volumetric analysis for better fracture-to-suction device customization.


FACE ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 273250162097617
Author(s):  
Francis Graziano ◽  
Paymon Sanati-Mehrizy ◽  
Dylan Taub ◽  
Saadi Ghatan ◽  
Peter J. Taub

Craniosynostosis describes the congenital, premature fusion of 1 or more cranial sutures. Prior studies have confirmed the ability of spring-assisted cranioplasty to expand the cranial vault in patients with craniosynostosis. Historically, preoperative planning for spring-assisted cranioplasty was performed using mainly computed tomography (CT). In particular, osteotomies were planned and bone thickness was measured to determine the gauge of spring required. Despite the benefits for presurgical planning, CT scans have several drawbacks including ionizing radiation to a newborn and increased healthcare expense. The authors describe a clinical case of using solely cranial ultrasonography in the preoperative planning of spring-assisted cranioplasty for a patient with scaphocephaly. Ultrasonography can be used as alternative means of measuring parietal bone thickness and preoperative planning for spring-assisted cranioplasty, while also decreasing the risk of ionizing radiation and minimizing healthcare costs.


1988 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 599 ◽  
Author(s):  
GG Scott ◽  
KC Richardson ◽  
CP Groves

The two extant genera of wombats, the hairy-nosed wombat Lasiorhinus latifrons and common wombat Vombatus ursinus, are distinguishable by their skull morphology. Significant size differences were found for skull length, nasal length binasal breadth, bitemporal breadth, bizygomatic breadth, parietal bone thickness and mandible length. The important different gross morphological features are summarised to allow rapid identification of these two species. A number of new diagnostic differences are described which distinguish the species from dorsal, lateral and ventral views and on the basis of mandibles and dentition. Some of these differences, and those listed in the results, also distinguish the Pleistocene fossil wombats V. mitchelli (Owen, 1838) and L. krefftii (Owen, 1871) from each other, and strongly suggest their generic status.


Author(s):  
Hetal Marfatia ◽  
Ratna Priya ◽  
Nilam U. Sathe ◽  
Sheetal Shelke
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document