Two Distinct Substrate Binding Modes for the Normal and Reverse Prenylation of Hapalindoles by the Prenyltransferase AmbP3

2017 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 560-563 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chin Piow Wong ◽  
Takayoshi Awakawa ◽  
Yu Nakashima ◽  
Takahiro Mori ◽  
Qin Zhu ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mor Goldfeder ◽  
Margarita Kanteev ◽  
Sivan Isaschar-Ovdat ◽  
Noam Adir ◽  
Ayelet Fishman

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (7) ◽  
pp. 2476-2485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Graef ◽  
Georgeta Seewald ◽  
Thomas Langer

ABSTRACT The energy-dependent proteolysis of cellular proteins is mediated by conserved proteolytic AAA+ complexes. Two such machines, the m- and i-AAA proteases, are present in the mitochondrial inner membrane. They exert chaperone-like properties and specifically degrade nonnative membrane proteins. However, molecular mechanisms of substrate engagement by AAA proteases remained elusive. Here, we define initial steps of substrate recognition and identify two distinct substrate binding sites in the i-AAA protease subunit Yme1. Misfolded polypeptides are recognized by conserved helices in proteolytic and AAA domains. Structural modeling reveals a lattice-like arrangement of these helices at the surface of hexameric AAA protease ring complexes. While helices within the AAA domain apparently play a general role for substrate binding, the requirement for binding to surface-exposed helices within the proteolytic domain is determined by the folding and membrane association of substrates. Moreover, an assembly factor of cytochrome c oxidase, Cox20, serves as a substrate-specific cofactor during proteolysis and modulates the initial interaction of nonassembled Cox2 with the protease. Our findings therefore reveal the existence of alternative substrate recognition pathways within AAA proteases and shed new light on molecular mechanisms ensuring the specificity of proteolysis by energy-dependent proteases.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayman Farag ◽  
Ping Wang ◽  
Mahmoud Ahmed ◽  
Hesham Sadek

The new strain of Coronaviruses (SARS-CoV-2), and the resulting Covid-19 disease has spread swiftly across the globe after its initial detection in late December 2019 in Wuhan, China, resulting in a pandemic status declaration by WHO within 3 months. Given the heavy toll of this pandemic, researchers are actively testing various strategies including new and repurposed drugs as well as vaccines. In the current brief report, we adopted a repositioning approach using insilico molecular modeling screening using FDA approved drugs with established safety profiles for potential inhibitory effects on Covid-19 virus. We started with structure based drug design by screening more than 2000 FDA approved drugs against Covid-19 virus main protease enzyme (Mpro) substrate-binding pocket focusing on two potential sites (central and terminal sites) to identify potential hits based on their binding energies, binding modes, interacting amino acids, and therapeutic indications. In addition, we elucidate preliminary pharmacophore features for candidates bound to Covid-19 virus Mpro substrate-binding pocket. The top hits bound to the central site of Mpro substrate-binding pocket include antiviral drugs such as Darunavir, Nelfinavir and Saquinavir, some of which are already being tested in Covid-19 patients. Interestingly, one of the most promising hits in our screen is the hypercholesterolemia drug Rosuvastatin. In addition, the top hits bound to the terminal site of Mpro substrate-binding pocket include the anti-asthma drug Montelukast and the anti-histaminic Fexofenadine among others. These results certainly do not confirm or indicate antiviral activity, but can rather be used as a starting point for further in vitro and in vivo testing, either individually or in combination.<br>


2009 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 191-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wipa Suginta ◽  
Supansa Pantoom ◽  
Heino Prinz

1999 ◽  
Vol 10 (21) ◽  
pp. 4191-4202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Per Berglund ◽  
Imre Vallikivi ◽  
Linda Fransson ◽  
Heinz Dannacher ◽  
Mats Holmquist ◽  
...  

Biochemistry ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 42 (21) ◽  
pp. 6370-6379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael R. Wester ◽  
Eric F. Johnson ◽  
Cristina Marques-Soares ◽  
Patrick M. Dansette ◽  
Daniel Mansuy ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document