Mug book exposure effects: Retroactive interference or criterion shift?

2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 127-134
Author(s):  
Hunter A. McAllister ◽  
John T. Blaze ◽  
Crystal A. Brandon ◽  
Joseph D. Deschamps ◽  
Christine A. Fultyn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retroactive Interference ◽  
Criterion Shift

Criterion Shift and Anchoring in a Discrimination Training Paradigm: the Importance of Pre-Training

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandro Scielzo ◽  
Stephen M. Fiore ◽  
Florian Jentsch ◽  
Sherri A. Rehfeld
Keyword(s):  
Discrimination Training ◽  
Training Paradigm ◽  
Criterion Shift

One-Trial Learning: Predictions about Negative Transfer

1998 ◽  
Vol 82 (3) ◽  
pp. 795-802 ◽  
Author(s):  
William E. Randall ◽  
David Goodman ◽  
John Dickinson
Keyword(s):  
Negative Transfer ◽  
Retroactive Interference ◽  
Response Competition ◽  
Learning Study ◽  
Additional Test ◽  
Free Trial ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Learning Research ◽  
Initial List

One-trial learning, though experienced by many has received minimal attention in motor learning research. As previous study in our laboratory provided some support, the present study was designed to follow-up by examining whether there is no expected negative transfer or response competition. 24 subjects were randomly assigned to a Response-Replacement or Stimulus-Replacement group in an ABAB learning study. Prior to testing subjects learned a list of eight S-R pairs to a criterion of two consecutive error-free trials. The stimuli were eight 3-letter nonsense syllables while responses were specific hand signs taken from the Gallaudet Survival Guide to Signing. Once the list had been learned, subjects transferred to a condition in which either three responses or three stimuli were replaced. Subjects were to learn this new list to a criterion of one error-free trial. Once they learned, subjects performed three additional test trials on the new list, without intervening acquisition trials, to assess negative transfer from the old list to the new list. The response-replaced group required significantly more acquisition trials than did the stimulus-replaced group. No significant difference in errors postcriterion between the groups was found. The findings were consistent with Guthrie's (1952) expectations, in that once the new response had been learned, there was no retroactive interference from the initial list.

scholarly journals Attenuation by contextual cues of retroactive interference of a conditional discrimination in rats

1993 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ward A. Rodriguez ◽  
Louis S. Borbely ◽  
Ronald S. Garcia
Keyword(s):  
Conditional Discrimination ◽  
Retroactive Interference ◽  
Contextual Cues

Hippocampal ERK1/2 activation contribute to sex differences in retroactive interference

2021 ◽  
Vol 429 ◽  
pp. 118562
Author(s):  
Marco Rinaudo ◽  
Fabiola Paciello ◽  
Francesca Natale ◽  
Francesco La Greca ◽  
Domenica Li Puma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sex Differences ◽  
Retroactive Interference
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document