scholarly journals Using GPS radio occultations to infer the water vapor feedback

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (22) ◽  
Author(s):  
Panagiotis Vergados ◽  
Anthony J. Mannucci ◽  
Chi O. Ao ◽  
Eric J. Fetzer
Keyword(s):  
Water Vapor ◽  
Water Vapor Feedback

scholarly journals Estimates of the Water Vapor Climate Feedback during El Niño–Southern Oscillation

2009 ◽  
Vol 22 (23) ◽  
pp. 6404-6412 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. E. Dessler ◽  
S. Wong
Keyword(s):  
Global Warming ◽  
Water Vapor ◽  
El Niño ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
El Nino ◽  
Southern Oscillation ◽  
Specific Humidity ◽  
El Niño Southern Oscillation ◽  
El Nino Southern Oscillation ◽  
Water Vapor Feedback

Abstract The strength of the water vapor feedback has been estimated by analyzing the changes in tropospheric specific humidity during El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) cycles. This analysis is done in climate models driven by observed sea surface temperatures [Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP) runs], preindustrial runs of fully coupled climate models, and in two reanalysis products, the 40-yr European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Re-Analysis (ERA-40) and the NASA Modern Era Retrospective-Analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA). The water vapor feedback during ENSO-driven climate variations in the AMIP models ranges from 1.9 to 3.7 W m−2 K−1, in the control runs it ranges from 1.4 to 3.9 W m−2 K−1, and in the ERA-40 and MERRA it is 3.7 and 4.7 W m−2 K−1, respectively. Taken as a group, these values are higher than previous estimates of the water vapor feedback in response to century-long global warming. Also examined is the reason for the large spread in the ENSO-driven water vapor feedback among the models and between the models and the reanalyses. The models and the reanalyses show a consistent relationship between the variations in the tropical surface temperature over an ENSO cycle and the radiative response to the associated changes in specific humidity. However, the feedback is defined as the ratio of the radiative response to the change in the global average temperature. Differences in extratropical temperatures will, therefore, lead to different inferred feedbacks, and this is the root cause of spread in feedbacks observed here. This is also the likely reason that the feedback inferred from ENSO is larger than for long-term global warming.

Robustness of Dynamical Feedbacks from Radiative Forcing: 2% Solar versus 2 × CO2 Experiments in an Idealized GCM

2012 ◽  
Vol 69 (7) ◽  
pp. 2256-2271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming Cai ◽  
Ka-Kit Tung
Keyword(s):  
Water Vapor ◽  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Lower Troposphere ◽  
Radiative Heating ◽  
Climate Feedback ◽  
Response Analysis ◽  
High Latitudes ◽  
Water Vapor Feedback ◽  
The Tropics ◽  
Heating Profile

Abstract Despite the differences in the spatial patterns of the external forcing associated with a doubling CO2 and with a 2% solar variability, the final responses in the troposphere and at the surface in a three-dimensional general circulation model appear remarkably similar. Various feedback processes are diagnosed and compared using the climate feedback–response analysis method (CFRAM) to understand the mechanisms responsible. At the surface, solar radiative forcing is stronger in the tropics than at the high latitudes, whereas greenhouse radiative forcing is stronger at high latitudes compared with the tropics. Also solar forcing is positive everywhere in the troposphere and greenhouse radiative forcing is positive mainly in the lower troposphere. The water vapor feedback strengthens the upward-decreasing radiative heating profile in the tropics and the poleward-decreasing radiative heating profile in the lower troposphere. The “evaporative” and convective feedbacks play an important role only in the tropics where they act to reduce the warming at the surface and lower troposphere in favor of upper-troposphere warming. Both water vapor feedback and enhancement of convection in the tropics further strengthen the initial poleward-decreasing profile of energy flux convergence perturbations throughout the troposphere. As a result, the large-scale dynamical poleward energy transport, which acts on the negative temperature gradient, is enhanced in both cases, contributing to a polar amplification of warming aloft and a warming reduction in the tropics. The dynamical amplification of polar atmospheric warming also contributes additional warming to the surface below via downward thermal radiation.

Anthropogenic greenhouse forcing and strong water vapor feedback increase temperature in Europe

2005 ◽  
Vol 32 (19) ◽  
pp. n/a-n/a ◽  
Author(s):  
Rolf Philipona ◽  
Bruno Dürr ◽  
Atsumu Ohmura ◽  
Christian Ruckstuhl
Keyword(s):  
Water Vapor ◽  
Water Vapor Feedback

Water Vapor Feedback in Climate Models

Science ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 310 (5749) ◽  
pp. 795-796 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert D. Cess
Keyword(s):  
Water Vapor ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Water Vapor Feedback
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document