Water Vapor Feedback in Climate Models

Science ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 310 (5749) ◽  
pp. 795-796 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert D. Cess
Keyword(s):  
Water Vapor ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Water Vapor Feedback

scholarly journals Estimates of the Water Vapor Climate Feedback during El Niño–Southern Oscillation

2009 ◽  
Vol 22 (23) ◽  
pp. 6404-6412 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. E. Dessler ◽  
S. Wong
Keyword(s):  
Global Warming ◽  
Water Vapor ◽  
El Niño ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
El Nino ◽  
Southern Oscillation ◽  
Specific Humidity ◽  
El Niño Southern Oscillation ◽  
El Nino Southern Oscillation ◽  
Water Vapor Feedback

Abstract The strength of the water vapor feedback has been estimated by analyzing the changes in tropospheric specific humidity during El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) cycles. This analysis is done in climate models driven by observed sea surface temperatures [Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP) runs], preindustrial runs of fully coupled climate models, and in two reanalysis products, the 40-yr European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Re-Analysis (ERA-40) and the NASA Modern Era Retrospective-Analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA). The water vapor feedback during ENSO-driven climate variations in the AMIP models ranges from 1.9 to 3.7 W m−2 K−1, in the control runs it ranges from 1.4 to 3.9 W m−2 K−1, and in the ERA-40 and MERRA it is 3.7 and 4.7 W m−2 K−1, respectively. Taken as a group, these values are higher than previous estimates of the water vapor feedback in response to century-long global warming. Also examined is the reason for the large spread in the ENSO-driven water vapor feedback among the models and between the models and the reanalyses. The models and the reanalyses show a consistent relationship between the variations in the tropical surface temperature over an ENSO cycle and the radiative response to the associated changes in specific humidity. However, the feedback is defined as the ratio of the radiative response to the change in the global average temperature. Differences in extratropical temperatures will, therefore, lead to different inferred feedbacks, and this is the root cause of spread in feedbacks observed here. This is also the likely reason that the feedback inferred from ENSO is larger than for long-term global warming.

scholarly journals Physical Mechanisms of Tropical Climate Feedbacks Investigated Using Temperature and Moisture Trends*

2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (22) ◽  
pp. 8968-8987 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. Ferraro ◽  
F. H. Lambert ◽  
M. Collins ◽  
G. M. Miles
Keyword(s):  
Water Vapor ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Tropical Climate ◽  
Lapse Rate ◽  
Climate Feedback ◽  
Climate Projections ◽  
Tropospheric Temperature ◽  
Regional Pattern ◽  
Rate Feedback ◽  
Water Vapor Feedback

Abstract Tropical climate feedback mechanisms are assessed using satellite-observed and model-simulated trends in tropical tropospheric temperature from the MSU/AMSU instruments and upper-tropospheric humidity from the HIRS instruments. Despite discrepancies in the rates of tropospheric warming between observations and models, both are consistent with constant relative humidity over the period 1979–2008. Because uncertainties in satellite-observed tropical-mean trends preclude a constraint on tropical-mean trends in models regional features of the feedbacks are also explored. The regional pattern of the lapse rate feedback is primarily determined by the regional pattern of surface temperature changes, as tropical atmospheric warming is relatively horizontally uniform. The regional pattern of the water vapor feedback is influenced by the regional pattern of precipitation changes, with variations of 1–2 W m−2 K−1 across the tropics (compared to a tropical-mean feedback magnitude of 3.3–4 W m−2 K−1). Thus the geographical patterns of water vapor and lapse rate feedbacks are not correlated, but when the feedbacks are calculated in precipitation percentiles rather than in geographical space they are anticorrelated, with strong positive water vapor feedback associated with strong negative lapse rate feedback. The regional structure of the feedbacks is not related to the strength of the tropical-mean feedback in a subset of the climate models from the CMIP5 archive. Nevertheless the approach constitutes a useful process-based test of climate models and has the potential to be extended to constrain regional climate projections.

scholarly journals The effects of aerosols on precipitation and dimensions of subtropical clouds: a sensitivity study using a numerical cloud model

2006 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Teller ◽  
Z. Levin
Keyword(s):  
Water Vapor ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Cloud Model ◽  
Cloud Condensation Nuclei ◽  
Sensitivity Study ◽  
Meteorological Conditions ◽  
Dust Particles ◽  
Noticeable Effect ◽  
Convective Clouds ◽  
Ice Nuclei

Abstract. Numerical experiments were carried out using the Tel-Aviv University 2-D cloud model to investigate the effects of increased concentrations of Cloud Condensation Nuclei (CCN), giant CCN (GCCN) and Ice Nuclei (IN) on the development of precipitation and cloud structure in mixed-phase sub-tropical convective clouds. In order to differentiate between the contribution of the aerosols and the meteorology, all simulations were conducted with the same meteorological conditions. The results show that under the same meteorological conditions, polluted clouds (with high CCN concentrations) produce less precipitation than clean clouds (with low CCN concentrations), the initiation of precipitation is delayed and the lifetimes of the clouds are longer. GCCN enhance the total precipitation on the ground in polluted clouds but they have no noticeable effect on cleaner clouds. The increased rainfall due to GCCN is mainly a result of the increased graupel mass in the cloud, but it only partially offsets the decrease in rainfall due to pollution (increased CCN). The addition of more effective IN, such as mineral dust particles, reduces the total amount of precipitation on the ground. This reduction is more pronounced in clean clouds than in polluted ones. Polluted clouds reach higher altitudes and are wider than clean clouds and both produce wider clouds (anvils) when more IN are introduced. Since under the same vertical sounding the polluted clouds produce less rain, more water vapor is left aloft after the rain stops. In our simulations about 3.5 times more water evaporates after the rain stops from the polluted cloud as compared to the clean cloud. The implication is that much more water vapor is transported from lower levels to the mid troposphere under polluted conditions, something that should be considered in climate models.

Scanning 10-W Water Vapor DIAL for the Investigation of Atmospheric Turbulence and Land-Atmosphere Feedback

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Behrendt ◽  
Florian Spaeth ◽  
Volker Wulfmeyer
Keyword(s):  
Heat Flux ◽  
Water Vapor ◽  
Latent Heat ◽  
Atmospheric Turbulence ◽  
Latent Heat Flux ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Weather Forecast ◽  
Surface Characteristics ◽  
Scanning System ◽  
Forecast Models

<p>We will present recent measurements made with the water vapor differential absorption lidar (DIAL) of University of Hohenheim (UHOH). This scanning system has been developed in recent years for the investigation of atmospheric turbulence and land-atmosphere feedback processes.</p><p>The lidar is housed in a mobile trailer and participated in recent years in a number of national and international field campaigns. We will present examples of vertical pointing and scanning measurements, especially close to the canopy. The water vapor gradients in the surface layer are related to the latent heat flux. Thus, with such low-elevation scans, the latent heat flux distribution over different surface characteristics can be monitored, which is important to verify and improve both numerical weather forecast models and climate models.</p><p>The transmitter of the UHOH DIAL consists of a diode-pumped Nd:YAG laser which pumps a Ti:sapphire laser. The output power of this laser is up to 10 W. Two injection seeders are used to switch pulse-to-pulse between the online and offline signals. These signals are then either directly sent into the atmosphere or coupled into a fiber and guided to a transmitting telescope which is attached to the scanner unit. The receiving telescope has a primary mirror with a dimeter of 80 cm. The backscatter signals are recorded shot to shot and are typically averaged over 0.1 to 1 s.</p>

scholarly journals Changes in Winter Atmospheric Rivers along the North American West Coast in CMIP5 Climate Models

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 118-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael D. Warner ◽  
Clifford F. Mass ◽  
Eric P. Salathé
Keyword(s):  
Water Vapor ◽  
North American ◽  
West Coast ◽  
American West ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Water Vapor Transport ◽  
The West ◽  
North American West ◽  
The North ◽  
Extreme Precipitation Events

Abstract Most extreme precipitation events that occur along the North American west coast are associated with winter atmospheric river (AR) events. Global climate models have sufficient resolution to simulate synoptic features associated with AR events, such as high values of vertically integrated water vapor transport (IVT) approaching the coast. From phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5), 10 simulations are used to identify changes in ARs impacting the west coast of North America between historical (1970–99) and end-of-century (2070–99) runs, using representative concentration pathway (RCP) 8.5. The most extreme ARs are identified in both time periods by the 99th percentile of IVT days along a north–south transect offshore of the coast. Integrated water vapor (IWV) and IVT are predicted to increase, while lower-tropospheric winds change little. Winter mean precipitation along the west coast increases by 11%–18% [from 4% to 6% (°C)−1], while precipitation on extreme IVT days increases by 15%–39% [from 5% to 19% (°C)−1]. The frequency of IVT days above the historical 99th percentile threshold increases as much as 290% by the end of this century.

scholarly journals Processes Controlling Tropical Tropopause Temperature and Stratospheric Water Vapor in Climate Models

2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (16) ◽  
pp. 6516-6535 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven C. Hardiman ◽  
Ian A. Boutle ◽  
Andrew C. Bushell ◽  
Neal Butchart ◽  
Mike J. P. Cullen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Vapor ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Atmospheric Composition ◽  
Stratospheric Water Vapor ◽  
Vertical Advection ◽  
Radiative Processes ◽  
Microphysical Properties ◽  
Tropical Tropopause ◽  
The Tropics ◽  
Tropopause Temperature

Abstract A warm bias in tropical tropopause temperature is found in the Met Office Unified Model (MetUM), in common with most models from phase 5 of CMIP (CMIP5). Key dynamical, microphysical, and radiative processes influencing the tropical tropopause temperature and lower-stratospheric water vapor concentrations in climate models are investigated using the MetUM. A series of sensitivity experiments are run to separate the effects of vertical advection, ice optical and microphysical properties, convection, cirrus clouds, and atmospheric composition on simulated tropopause temperature and lower-stratospheric water vapor concentrations in the tropics. The numerical accuracy of the vertical advection, determined in the MetUM by the choice of interpolation and conservation schemes used, is found to be particularly important. Microphysical and radiative processes are found to influence stratospheric water vapor both through modifying the tropical tropopause temperature and through modifying upper-tropospheric water vapor concentrations, allowing more water vapor to be advected into the stratosphere. The representation of any of the processes discussed can act to significantly reduce biases in tropical tropopause temperature and stratospheric water vapor in a physical way, thereby improving climate simulations.

Thermodynamic Scaling of the Hydrological Cycle of the Last Glacial Maximum

2012 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 992-1006 ◽  
Author(s):  
William R. Boos
Keyword(s):  
Water Vapor ◽  
Last Glacial Maximum ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Hydrological Cycle ◽  
High Latitudes ◽  
Last Glacial ◽  
The Tropics ◽  
The Last Glacial Maximum ◽  
Circulation Changes ◽  
The Last Glacial

Abstract In climate models subject to greenhouse gas–induced warming, vertically integrated water vapor increases at nearly the same rate as its saturation value. Previous studies showed that this increase dominates circulation changes in climate models, so that precipitation minus evaporation (P − E) decreases in the subtropics and increases in the tropics and high latitudes at a rate consistent with a Clausius–Clapeyron scaling. This study examines whether the same thermodynamic scaling describes differences in the hydrological cycle between modern times and the last glacial maximum (LGM), as simulated by a suite of coupled ocean–atmosphere models. In these models, changes in water vapor between modern and LGM climates do scale with temperature according to Clausius–Clapeyron, but this thermodynamic scaling provides a poorer description of the changes in P − E. While the scaling is qualitatively consistent with simulations in the zonal mean, predicting higher P − E in the subtropics and lower P − E in the tropics and high latitudes, it fails to account for high-amplitude zonal asymmetries. Large horizontal gradients of temperature change, which are often neglected when applying the scaling to next-century warming, are shown to be important in large parts of the extratropics. However, even with this correction the thermodynamic scaling provides a poor quantitative fit to the simulations. This suggests that circulation changes play a dominant role in regional hydrological change between modern and LGM climates. Changes in transient eddy moisture transports are shown to be particularly important, even in the deep tropics. Implications for the selection and interpretation of climate proxies are discussed.

Robustness of Dynamical Feedbacks from Radiative Forcing: 2% Solar versus 2 × CO2 Experiments in an Idealized GCM

2012 ◽  
Vol 69 (7) ◽  
pp. 2256-2271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming Cai ◽  
Ka-Kit Tung
Keyword(s):  
Water Vapor ◽  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Lower Troposphere ◽  
Radiative Heating ◽  
Climate Feedback ◽  
Response Analysis ◽  
High Latitudes ◽  
Water Vapor Feedback ◽  
The Tropics ◽  
Heating Profile

Abstract Despite the differences in the spatial patterns of the external forcing associated with a doubling CO2 and with a 2% solar variability, the final responses in the troposphere and at the surface in a three-dimensional general circulation model appear remarkably similar. Various feedback processes are diagnosed and compared using the climate feedback–response analysis method (CFRAM) to understand the mechanisms responsible. At the surface, solar radiative forcing is stronger in the tropics than at the high latitudes, whereas greenhouse radiative forcing is stronger at high latitudes compared with the tropics. Also solar forcing is positive everywhere in the troposphere and greenhouse radiative forcing is positive mainly in the lower troposphere. The water vapor feedback strengthens the upward-decreasing radiative heating profile in the tropics and the poleward-decreasing radiative heating profile in the lower troposphere. The “evaporative” and convective feedbacks play an important role only in the tropics where they act to reduce the warming at the surface and lower troposphere in favor of upper-troposphere warming. Both water vapor feedback and enhancement of convection in the tropics further strengthen the initial poleward-decreasing profile of energy flux convergence perturbations throughout the troposphere. As a result, the large-scale dynamical poleward energy transport, which acts on the negative temperature gradient, is enhanced in both cases, contributing to a polar amplification of warming aloft and a warming reduction in the tropics. The dynamical amplification of polar atmospheric warming also contributes additional warming to the surface below via downward thermal radiation.

scholarly journals The Sensitivity of the Hydrological Cycle to Internal Climate Variability versus Anthropogenic Climate Change

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. 3661-3673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan J. Kramer ◽  
Brian J. Soden
Keyword(s):  
Water Vapor ◽  
Time Scales ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Hydrological Cycle ◽  
Internal Variability ◽  
Radiative Cooling ◽  
Surface Warming ◽  
Internal Climate Variability ◽  
Radiative Processes ◽  
Global Mean

Abstract In response to rising CO2 concentrations, climate models predict that globally averaged precipitation will increase at a much slower rate than water vapor. However, some observational studies suggest that global-mean precipitation and water vapor have increased at similar rates. While the modeling results emphasize changes at multidecadal time scales where the anthropogenic signal dominates, the shorter observational record is more heavily influenced by internal variability. Whether the physical constraints on the hydrological cycle fundamentally differ between these time scales is investigated. The results of this study show that while global-mean precipitation is constrained by radiative cooling on both time scales, the effects of CO2 dominate on multidecadal time scales, acting to suppress the increase in radiative cooling with warming. This results in a smaller precipitation change compared to interannual time scales where the effects of CO2 forcing are small. It is also shown that intermodel spread in the response of atmospheric radiative cooling (and thus global-mean precipitation) to anthropogenically forced surface warming is dominated by clear-sky radiative processes and not clouds, while clouds dominate under internal variability. The findings indicate that the sensitivity of the global hydrological cycle to surface warming differs fundamentally between internal variability and anthropogenically forced changes and this has important implications for interpreting observations of the hydrological sensitivity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document