Electronic cigarettes in smoking cessation

2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 295-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corey E. Scheer

Background: Tobacco use is the most prevalent preventable cause of death in the United States, accounting for approximately 20% of all deaths each year. Despite available treatment options, many smokers still experience multiple failed quit attempts indicating a need for development of novel therapies. When the electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) was introduced to the United States' market in 2007, patients began to discuss its possible use as the newest form of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT). Methods: A PubMed search was performed for the following terms: “Electronic cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and smoking cessation”. A manual search of references from articles found was performed to identify additional relevant articles. Results: Most evidence surrounding use of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation is found in self-reports and user surveys. One study looking at short-term effects of e-cigarettes on desire to smoke found a decreased desire in subjects inhaling from both nicotine-containing and placebo e-cigarettes. Three studies from Italy looked at natural reduction of cigarette use when subjects were allowed to freely use e-cigarettes. All three studies showed a natural reduction indicating potential efficacy for e-cigarette use in smoking cessation. A recently published randomized controlled trial was unable to prove superiority of e-cigarettes over transdermal nicotine patches for smoking cessation. Conclusions: A few studies have explored the possibility of replacing tobacco cigarettes with e-cigarettes to facilitate a natural reduction in use and have shown minimal positive results in a population not intending to quit. A recent randomized controlled trial comparing e-cigarettes with nicotine patches for smoking cessation was unable to prove superiority. Until these products are regulated and efficacy can be shown with well-designed studies, e-cigarettes are not a viable treatment for use in smoking cessation or as nicotine replacement therapy.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Medina-Ramirez ◽  
Patricia Calixte-Civil ◽  
Lauren R Meltzer ◽  
Karen O Brandon ◽  
Ursula Martinez ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND There is a pressing need to address the unacceptable disparities and underrepresentation of racial and ethnic minority groups, including Hispanics or Latinxs, in smoking cessation trials. OBJECTIVE Given the lack of research on recruitment strategies for this population, this study aims to assess effective recruitment methods based on enrollment and cost. METHODS Recruitment and enrollment data were collected from a nationwide randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a Spanish-language smoking cessation intervention (N=1417). The effectiveness of each recruitment strategy was evaluated by computing the cost per participant (CPP), which is the ratio of direct cost over the number enrolled. More effective strategies yielded lower CPPs. Demographic and smoking-related characteristics of participants recruited via the two most effective strategies were also compared (n=1307). RESULTS Facebook was the most effective method (CPP=US $74.12), followed by TV advertisements (CPP=US $191.31), whereas public bus interior card advertising was the least effective method (CPP=US $642.50). Participants recruited via Facebook had lower average age (<i>P</i>=.008) and had spent fewer years in the United States (<i>P</i>&lt;.001). Among the participants recruited via Facebook, a greater percentage of individuals had at least a high school education (<i>P</i>&lt;.001) and an annual income above US $10,000 (<i>P</i>&lt;.001). In addition, a greater percentage of individuals were employed (<i>P</i>&lt;.001) and foreign born (<i>P</i>=.003). In terms of subethnicity, among the subjects recruited via Facebook, a lower percentage of individuals were of Mexican origin (<i>P</i>&lt;.001) and a greater percentage of individuals were of Central American (<i>P</i>=.02), South American (<i>P</i>=.01), and Cuban (<i>P</i>&lt;.001) origin. CONCLUSIONS Facebook was the most effective method for recruiting Hispanic or Latinx smokers in the United States for this RCT. However, using multiple methods was necessary to recruit a more diverse sample of Spanish-preferring Hispanic or Latinx smokers.


10.2196/19389 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. e19389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Medina-Ramirez ◽  
Patricia Calixte-Civil ◽  
Lauren R Meltzer ◽  
Karen O Brandon ◽  
Ursula Martinez ◽  
...  

Background There is a pressing need to address the unacceptable disparities and underrepresentation of racial and ethnic minority groups, including Hispanics or Latinxs, in smoking cessation trials. Objective Given the lack of research on recruitment strategies for this population, this study aims to assess effective recruitment methods based on enrollment and cost. Methods Recruitment and enrollment data were collected from a nationwide randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a Spanish-language smoking cessation intervention (N=1417). The effectiveness of each recruitment strategy was evaluated by computing the cost per participant (CPP), which is the ratio of direct cost over the number enrolled. More effective strategies yielded lower CPPs. Demographic and smoking-related characteristics of participants recruited via the two most effective strategies were also compared (n=1307). Results Facebook was the most effective method (CPP=US $74.12), followed by TV advertisements (CPP=US $191.31), whereas public bus interior card advertising was the least effective method (CPP=US $642.50). Participants recruited via Facebook had lower average age (P=.008) and had spent fewer years in the United States (P<.001). Among the participants recruited via Facebook, a greater percentage of individuals had at least a high school education (P<.001) and an annual income above US $10,000 (P<.001). In addition, a greater percentage of individuals were employed (P<.001) and foreign born (P=.003). In terms of subethnicity, among the subjects recruited via Facebook, a lower percentage of individuals were of Mexican origin (P<.001) and a greater percentage of individuals were of Central American (P=.02), South American (P=.01), and Cuban (P<.001) origin. Conclusions Facebook was the most effective method for recruiting Hispanic or Latinx smokers in the United States for this RCT. However, using multiple methods was necessary to recruit a more diverse sample of Spanish-preferring Hispanic or Latinx smokers.


Obesity ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (10) ◽  
pp. 1558-1565 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca A. Krukowski ◽  
Marion E. Hare ◽  
Gerald W. Talcott ◽  
Leslie A. Gladney ◽  
Karen C. Johnson ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikkil Sudharsanan ◽  
Caterina Favaretti ◽  
Violetta Hachaturyan ◽  
Till Baernighausen ◽  
Alain Vandormael

Vaccination rates have stagnated in the United States and the United Kingdom leading to the continuing spread of COVID-19. Fear and concern over vaccine side-effects is one of the main drivers of hesitancy. Drawing from behavioral science and health communication theory, we conducted a randomized controlled trial among 8998 adults to determine whether the way COVID-19 vaccine side-effects are framed and presented to individuals can influence their willingness to take a vaccine. We presented participants information on a hypothetical future COVID-19 vaccine -- including information on its side-effect rate -- and then examined the effect of three side-effect framing strategies on individuals stated willingness to take this vaccine: adding a qualitative risk label next to the numerical risk, adding comparison risks, and for those presented with comparisons, framing the comparison in relative rather than absolute terms. Based on a pre-registered and published analysis plan, we found that adding a simple descriptive risk label (very low risk) next to the numerical side-effect increased participants' willingness to take the COVID-19 vaccine by 3.0 percentage points (p = 0.003). Providing a comparison to motor vehicle mortality increased COVID-19 vaccine willingness by 2.4 percentage points (p = 0.051). These effects were independent and additive: participants that received both a qualitative risk label and comparison to motor-vehicle mortality were 6.1 percentage points (p < 0.001) more likely to report willingness to take a vaccine compared to those who did not receive a label or comparison. Taken together, our results reveal that despite increasingly strong vaccination hesitancy and exposure to large amounts of vaccine misinformation, low-cost side-effect framing strategies can meaningfully affect vaccination intentions at a population level.


2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abu S. Abdullah ◽  
Anthony J. Hedley ◽  
Sophia S. C. Chan ◽  
Tai-Hing Lam

This study examined if 2-week free nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) would be more effective than 1-week free NRT to help smokers quit smoking at 6 and 12 months. In a single-blinded randomized controlled trial design, 562 Chinese smokers who attended a smoking cessation clinic in Hong Kong, China, were randomly allocated into two groups (A1 and A2): A1 (n=284) received behavioural counselling with free NRT for 1 week; A2 (n=278) received similar counselling with free NRT for 2 weeks. All subjects received printed self-help materials to support their quitting efforts. A structured questionnaire was used for data collection, including pattern of NRT use and self-reported 7-day point prevalence quit rate at 6 months and 12 months. Among the participants, the mean number of cigarettes smoked per day was 18.8 (SD=10.9). By intention-to-treat analysis, 7-day point prevalence quit rates were not significantly different between A1 and A2 groups at 6-month (27.5% versus 27.3%;P=0.97) and 12-month (21.1% versus 21.2%;P=0.98) followup. The findings suggest that two-week free NRT was not more effective than 1-week free NRT to increase smoking cessation rate among Chinese smokers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document