scholarly journals Emergency thoracic endovascular aortic repair for traumatic thoracic aortic rupture can be life-saving

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 102-105
Author(s):  
Abdullah Özer
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Rupture ◽  
Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Aortic Repair ◽  
Life Saving

scholarly journals DynaCT-guided thoracic endovascular aortic repair in a patient with para-aortic malignant lymphoma

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 491-492
Author(s):  
Kenta Masada ◽  
Toru Kuratani ◽  
Kazuo Shimamura ◽  
Yoshiki Sawa
Keyword(s):  
Malignant Lymphoma ◽  
Thoracic Aorta ◽  
Aortic Rupture ◽  
Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Good Option ◽  
Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Descending Aorta ◽  
Aortic Repair ◽  
Tumour Location

Abstract Para-aortic malignant lymphoma invading the thoracic aorta can cause aortic rupture. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is a good option to treat aortic rupture associated with para-aortic malignancies. It is essential to detect the exact tumour location during TEVAR; however, it is often difficult to confirm the location with conventional 2-dimensional fluoroscopic or angiographic images. We describe successful TEVAR using syngo DynaCT (Siemens AG, Forchheim, Germany) in a 64-year-old man with para-aortic malignant lymphoma invading the descending aorta.

scholarly journals Aortic rupture due to radiation injury successfully treated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yohei Kawatani ◽  
Hirotsugu Kurobe ◽  
Yoshitsugu Nakamura ◽  
Yuji Suda ◽  
Takaki Hori
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Injury ◽  
Aortic Rupture ◽  
Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Aortic Repair

Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for the Treatment of Acute Aortic Rupture

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Kreibich ◽  
M. Siepe ◽  
T. Berger ◽  
J. Morlock ◽  
S. Kondov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Rupture ◽  
Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Aortic Repair

Prophylactic use of thoracic endovascular aortic repair in a young patient with impending aortic rupture

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-79
Author(s):  
Rafath Ullah ◽  
M. Fuad Jan ◽  
Puneet Menaria ◽  
Joseph R. Whitnah ◽  
John Crouch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Young Patient ◽  
Aortic Rupture ◽  
Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Aortic Repair ◽  
Prophylactic Use

scholarly journals Overall survival and factors predicting long-term outcome after thoracic aortic endovascular repair

2020 ◽  
pp. 145749692091000
Author(s):  
B. De Coster ◽  
S. Houthoofd ◽  
A. Laenen ◽  
I. Fourneau ◽  
G. Maleux
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Aortic Rupture ◽  
Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Acute Type ◽  
Type B ◽  
Traumatic Aortic Rupture ◽  
Aortic Repair

Purpose: To assess overall survival and to determine factors predicting outcome after thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Materials and methods: A Retrospective analysis was performed on a cohort of 212 consecutive patients (165 men and 47 women; mean age 64 years) who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair in a tertiary referral center for aortic disease. Main indications were true thoracic aortic aneurysm (n = 58; 27.6%), traumatic aortic rupture (n = 33; 15.7%), anastomotic pseudoaneurysms (n = 23; 10.9%), chronic type B aortic dissection (n = 22; 10.5%), and symptomatic, acute type B dissection (n = 21; 10.0%). In 79 patients (37.3%), a hybrid procedure, including supra-aortic rerouting, was performed. Kaplan–Meier estimates were used for overall survival and Cox regression models were used for univariable analysis of the association between risk factors and survival. Results: Proximal landing zones were predominantly zone 3 (n = 66; 31.3%), zone 2 (n = 63; 29.9%), and zone 1 (n = 38; 18%). In-hospital mortality was n = 18 (8.5%). Overall survival was 79.6%, 65.9%, and 51.1% at 2, 5, and 10 years, respectively; better overall survival was shown for traumatic aortic rupture, anastomotic pseudoaneurysms, and chronic posttraumatic pseudoaneurysms (p < 0.05). Clinical risk factors influencing overall survival include prior coronary bypass surgery, atrial flutter, arterial hypertension, renal failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and associated abdominal aortic aneurysm (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair is an effective treatment option for various thoracic aortic diseases with highest survival rates for traumatic aortic rupture and anastomotic pseudoaneurysms. Several clinical parameters are identified as risk factors for overall survival.

scholarly journals Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Through Cardiac Apex in the Setting of Thoracic Aortic Rupture

2018 ◽  
Vol 106 (4) ◽  
pp. e177-e178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Agostinelli ◽  
Davide Carino ◽  
Bruno Borrello ◽  
Giorgio Romano ◽  
Luigi Vignali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Rupture ◽  
Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Aortic Repair ◽  
Cardiac Apex
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document