scholarly journals Mary Lyon: Mount Holyoke Kız İlahiyat Okulu ve Mezunlarının Osmanlı Devleti nde Eğitim Misyonerliği Faaliyetleri

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 1665-1701
Author(s):  
Füsun Çoban Döşkaya
Keyword(s):  
Genetics ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 142 (2) ◽  
pp. 537-548 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael W Nachman ◽  
Gary A Churchill

Abstract If loci are randomly distributed on a physical map, the density of markers on a genetic map will be inversely proportional to recombination rate. First proposed by MARY LYON, we have used this idea to estimate recombination rates from the Drosophila melanogaster linkage map. These results were compared with results of two other studies that estimated regional recombination rates in D. melanogaster using both physical and genetic maps. The three methods were largely concordant in identifying large-scale genomic patterns of recombination. The marker density method was then applied to the Mus musculus microsatellite linkage map. The distribution of microsatellites provided evidence for heterogeneity in recombination rates. Centromeric regions for several mouse chromosomes had significantly greater numbers of markers than expected, suggesting that recombination rates were lower in these regions. In contrast, most telomeric regions contained significantly fewer markers than expected. This indicates that recombination rates are elevated at the telomeres of many mouse chromosomes and is consistent with a comparison of the genetic and cytogenetic maps in these regions. The density of markers on a genetic map may provide a generally useful way to estimate regional recombination rates in species for which genetic, but not physical, maps are available.


2017 ◽  
Vol 372 (1733) ◽  
pp. 20160360 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. M. Creamer ◽  
J. B. Lawrence

XIST RNA triggers the transformation of an active X chromosome into a condensed, inactive Barr body and therefore provides a unique window into transitions of higher-order chromosome architecture. Despite recent progress, how XIST RNA localizes and interacts with the X chromosome remains poorly understood. Genetic engineering of XIST into a trisomic autosome demonstrates remarkable capacity of XIST RNA to localize and comprehensively silence that autosome. Thus, XIST does not require X chromosome-specific sequences but operates on mechanisms available genome-wide. Prior results suggested XIST localization is controlled by attachment to the insoluble nuclear scaffold. Our recent work affirms that scaffold attachment factor A (SAF-A) is involved in anchoring XIST , but argues against the view that SAF-A provides a unimolecular bridge between RNA and the chromosome. Rather, we suggest that a complex meshwork of architectural proteins interact with XIST RNA. Parallel work studying the territory of actively transcribed chromosomes suggests that repeat-rich RNA ‘coats’ euchromatin and may impact chromosome architecture in a manner opposite of XIST . A model is discussed whereby RNA may not just recruit histone modifications, but more directly impact higher-order chromatin condensation via interaction with architectural proteins of the nucleus. This article is part of the themed issue ‘X-chromosome inactivation: a tribute to Mary Lyon’.


1997 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. R269-R270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gail Vines
Keyword(s):  

1990 ◽  
Vol 56 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 99-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Rastan ◽  
S. D. M. Brown

SummaryThe phenomenon of X-chromosome inactivation in female mammals, whereby one of the two X chromosome present in each cell of the female embryo is inactivated early in development, was first described by Mary Lyon in 1961. Nearly 30 years later, the mechanism of X-chromosome inactivation remains unknown. Strong evidence has accumulated over the years, however, for the involvement of a major switch or inactivation centre on the mouse X chromosome. Identification of the inactivation centre at the molecular level would be an important step in understanding the mechanism of X-inactivation. In this paper we review the evidence for the existence and location of the X-inactivation centre on the mouse X-chromosome, present data on the molecular genetic mapping of this region, and describe ongoing strategies we are using to attempt to identify the inactivation centre at the molecular level.


2017 ◽  
Vol 372 (1733) ◽  
pp. 20160365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Sado

In the mouse, while either X chromosome is chosen for inactivation in a random fashion in the embryonic tissue, the paternally derived X chromosome is preferentially inactivated in the extraembryonic tissues. It has been shown that the maternal X chromosome is imprinted so as not to undergo inactivation in the extraembryonic tissues. X-linked noncoding Xist RNA becomes upregulated on the X chromosome that is to be inactivated. An antisense noncoding RNA, Tsix , which occurs at the Xist locus and has been shown to negatively regulate Xist expression in cis, is imprinted to be expressed from the maternal X in the extraembryonic tissues. Although Tsix appears to be responsible for the imprint laid on the maternal X, those who disagree with this idea would point out the fact that Tsix has not yet been expressed from the maternal X when Xist becomes upregulated on the paternal but not the maternal X at the onset of imprinted X-inactivation in preimplantation embryos. Recent studies have demonstrated, however, that there is a prominent difference in the chromatin structure at the Xist locus depending on the parental origin, which I suggest might account for the repression of maternal Xist in the absence of maternal Tsix at the preimplantation stages. This article is part of the themed issue ‘X-chromosome inactivation: a tribute to Mary Lyon’.


1990 ◽  
Vol 56 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 84-89
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document