Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided to Fluoroscopy-Guided Biceps Tendon Sheath Therapeutic Injection

2016 ◽  
Vol 35 (10) ◽  
pp. 2217-2221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonelle Petscavage-Thomas ◽  
Cristy Gustas
2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. 1069-1073 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomohisa Hashiuchi ◽  
Goro Sakurai ◽  
Mitsutoshi Morimoto ◽  
Tatsuya Komei ◽  
Yoshinori Takakura ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
John Slevin ◽  
Meghan Joyce ◽  
Joseph W. Galvin ◽  
Michael A. Mahlon ◽  
Matthew D. Grant ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 232596711875657 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eldra W. Daniels ◽  
David Cole ◽  
Bret Jacobs ◽  
Shawn F. Phillips

Office-based ultrasonography has become increasingly available in many settings, and its use to guide joint and soft tissue injections has increased. Numerous studies have been conducted to evaluate the use of ultrasound-guided injections over traditional landmark-guided injections, with a rapid growth in the literature over the past few years. A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted to demonstrate increased accuracy of ultrasound-guided injections regardless of anatomic location. In the upper extremity, ultrasound-guided injections have been shown to provide superior benefit to landmark-guided injections at the glenohumeral joint, the subacromial space, the biceps tendon sheath, and the joints of the hand and wrist. Ultrasound-guided injections of the acromioclavicular and the elbow joints have not been shown to be more efficacious. In the lower extremity, ultrasound-guided injections at the knee, ankle, and foot have superior efficacy to landmark-guided injections. Conclusive evidence is not available regarding improved efficacy of ultrasound-guided injections of the hip, although landmark-guided injection is performed less commonly at the hip joint. Ultrasound-guided injections are overall more accurate than landmark-guided injections. While current studies indicate that ultrasound guidance improves efficacy and cost-effectiveness of many injections, these studies are limited and more research is needed.


2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (12) ◽  
pp. 3267-3271
Author(s):  
Christian Geannette ◽  
Danielle Williams ◽  
Jennifer Berkowitz ◽  
Theodore T. Miller

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 232596712110036
Author(s):  
Jong Geol Do ◽  
Jin Tae Hwang ◽  
Kyung Jae Yoon ◽  
Yong-Taek Lee

Background: Ultrasound is an essential tool for diagnosing shoulder disorders. However, the role of ultrasound in assessing and diagnosing adhesive capsulitis has not been fully studied. Purpose: To evaluate the ultrasound features of adhesive capsulitis and estimate the correlations between clinical impairment and ultrasound parameters. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A total of 61 patients with clinically diagnosed unilateral adhesive capsulitis were retrospectively reviewed using high-resolution ultrasound. To compare ultrasound parameters, we performed ultrasound examinations on both affected and unaffected shoulders. Ultrasound parameters, including thickness of the coracohumeral ligament (CHL), rotator interval (RI), axillary recess (AR), hypervascularity of the RI, and effusion of the long head of the biceps tendon sheath, were measured. Passive range of motion (PROM), visual analog scale for pain, and the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index were used for clinical assessment. Results: The CHL, the RI, and the AR in affected shoulders were significantly thicker than in unaffected shoulders ( P < .05). CHL thickness in affected shoulders was significantly correlated with PROM limitation, which included forward elevation, abduction, external rotation (ER), and internal rotation (IR) ( P < .05). AR thickness correlated with passive forward elevation limitation and passive IR limitation ( P < .05). The CHL was significantly thicker in stage 2 compared with stage 1, and the RI was thicker in stage 2 compared with stage 3. The diagnostic cutoff values for adhesive capsulitis were 2.2 mm for CHL thickness (77% sensitivity, 91.8% specificity) and 4 mm for AR thickness (68.9% sensitivity, 90.2% specificity). Conclusion: The ultrasound parameters associated with structural changes were correlated with clinical characteristics of adhesive capsulitis. Thickened CHL, RI, and AR were observed in affected shoulders. The cutoff values of 2.2 mm for CHL thickness and 4 mm for AR thickness can be used as cutoff diagnostic values for adhesive capsulitis.


2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-139
Author(s):  
Hassan M.T. Fawi ◽  
Stefan Dojcinov ◽  
Kathleen Lyons ◽  
Timothy J.W. Matthews

We report the case of a middle-age lady who presented following minor trauma, with dominant-sided anterior elbow pain and swelling of 6 months in duration. She was assessed clinically, and underwent investigations, which confirmed features consistent with giant cell tumour (GCT) of distal biceps tendon sheath. She underwent uneventful en-bloc excisional surgery. She did not have radiotherapy. She is now 5 years postoperatively asymptomatic, with full function, and with no signs of recurrence.


Author(s):  
Hilal S.A. Al Housni ◽  
Lisa M. Hackett ◽  
George A.C. Murrell

2011 ◽  
Vol 90 (7) ◽  
pp. 564-571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffery J. Muir ◽  
Heather M. Curtiss ◽  
John Hollman ◽  
Jay Smith ◽  
Jonathan T. Finnoff

2013 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 399-402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel De Maeseneer ◽  
Tom Van Isacker ◽  
Leon Lenchik ◽  
Marie-Astrid Van Caillie ◽  
Maryam Shahabpour

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document