scholarly journals Sanatta Mekânın Yeni Deneyimi: James Turrell

2020 ◽  
Vol Volume 15 Issue 8 (Volume 15 Issue 8) ◽  
pp. 3931-3941
Author(s):  
Canan ZÖNGÜR- Nilay ÖZSAVAŞ ULUÇAY
Keyword(s):  
2014 ◽  
pp. 5-9
Author(s):  
Mikko Heikkinen

The following keynote was presented at the 12th International docomomo Conference that took place in Espoo, Finland, in August 2012. The title refers to the lecture given by an American artist James Turrell at the symposium Permanence in Architecture organized by Virginia Tech in 1998. In architecture and in all arts the new is eroding the old earth and slowly reforming tradition. “Survival of Modern” could be seen as an effort to use the built “modern” environment in a sustainable way. Mikko Heikkinen believes that our challenge is not only to make iconic masterpieces of the Modern Masters to survive but even more what to do with the vast mass of contemporary buildings not found in the architectural guide books. In his presentation, Mikko Heikkinen listed five different cases – five different strategies to make modern to survive: 1) recycling, 2) preserving and restoring the historical milieu, 3) creating a historical and functional collage, 4) preserving a historical fragment and 5) contradiction.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (20) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Lara Aspee ◽  
Paulina Estay Cornejo
Keyword(s):  

Este artículo trata del edificio de la Escuela de Derecho de la Universidad de Valparaíso, desde una descripción morfológica y de emplazamiento, destacando su vocación original, espacialidad y materialidad, realizando un rescate de su valor urbanístico, icónico, estético y de identidad a través de sus elementos arquitectónicos y paisajísticos. Luego, se asocian atributos del edificio que construyen el paisaje con la cualidad de dar forma a la luz y el espacio, comparando con la obra de James Turrell. Se infiere que la vivencia sensorial del paisaje que construye la Escuela de Derecho desde su entorno natural es el patrimonio fundamental que debemos preservar.


2009 ◽  
Vol 13 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 200-219
Author(s):  
Bob Sheil

The spectacular surroundings of Kielder Water & Forest Park, in Northumberland, England, are a confluence of opposing states: the man-made and natural; the utilitarian and recreational; the beautiful and isolated; shaped by weather converging from east and west. Kielder Castle was built in 1775 as the Duke of Northumberland's hunting lodge. In recent years the territory has gained notoriety for a series of innovative art and architectural commissions including Belvedere by Softroom Architects (1999), Kielder Skyspace by the American artist James Turrell (2000), Minotaur by architect Nick Coombe and artist Shona Kitchen (2003), and Kielder Observatory by Charles Barclay Architects (2008). This paper outlines one of Kielder's most recent additions – a shelter entitled 55/02 – the result of a collaboration between sixteen*(makers) and manufacturers Stahlbogen GmbH. The work rekindles the symbiotic relationship between design and making once central to the production of architecture. The reawakening of this tradition has been stimulated by the mainstream adaptation of CAD/CAM as an industrial and disciplinary medium which binds the protocols of drawing with those of fabrication. However, as this account of the project shows, the relevance of an increasingly digitised world extends beyond the production of 55/02 as an artefact – it forms the basis of the architecture's relationship with its locality as an industrial, historical, social, cultural and manufactured landscape [1].


Protée ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 69-80
Author(s):  
Marie Renoue
Keyword(s):  

Résumé Les interprétations de la lumière ont parfois à faire avec la contradiction – une contradiction logiquement neutralisée ou ramassée dans une structure tensive. C’est de ces contradictions ou plus précisément des paradoxes – mettant en jeu un paradigme sociétal et sa manifestation – que nous nous proposons de traiter en privilégiant l’étude de deux oeuvres artistiques singulières : celle de Pierre Soulages, qui combine noir et lumière, et celle de James Turrell, qui joue de la densité matérielle et haptique de lumière colorée. Ces études et les débats sur la visibilité – invisibilité de la lumière et la question du paradoxe – invitent à s’interroger sur les modalités d’un « effet lumière », de l’apparaître du lumineux et de son énonciation. Ils incitent ainsi à explorer la problématique des modalités d’émergence d’un objet, celles de la saisie et de la description du sensible lumineux.


2010 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 89-91
Author(s):  
Simon Unwin
Keyword(s):  

Some artists have a sense of architecture, using it in or around their work. I am thinking of Antony Gormley whose casts of his own body are almost always located in relation to a setting – whether a beach, the courtyard of a gallery or the precipitous edges of high buildings. I am thinking too of James Turrell whose light spaces are works of architecture, places in which to contemplate the sky, to watch the sunlight pan slowly around the space. I would cite too Martin Creed whose fugitive sprinters ran approximately along the axis of the Duveen Galleries at Tate Britain in London, framed by them, avoiding visitors as they rushed from one end to the other; and Anish Kapoor for his bulbous walls or his vast ‘trumpet’ – Marsyas – in the Turbine Hall of Tate Modern.


IDEA JOURNAL ◽  
2012 ◽  
pp. 88-97
Author(s):  
Chris Cottrell

In contrast to terms which make clear distinctions regarding spatial limits, such as inside and outside, interiority can be understood as an ambiguous spatial condition. A sense of interiority, where spatial volumes interact as a dynamic interplay of surfaces, materials, atmospheres and perceptions, is a constant blurring of these limits. This interplay is foregrounded in the work of James Turrell, whose projects engage the complexity of these relationships. His projects create ambiguous and oscillating readings of inside and outside, the experience of which is more complex than the abstract or sublime experience of his work as typically represented. This paper will discuss an early installation by Turrell called Meeting (1986) in relation to Sylvia Lavin’s notion of ‘kissing’: an extended metaphor which uses the term in both its bodily and geometric senses, to describe a more pliable and dynamic notion of spatial threshold. Kissing will be used to think through the relationships present in the experience of Turrell’s work. I will examine how combinations of our bodies, exterior atmospheres – weather, and interior atmospheres – ambience, intermix to create new, provisional ways of thinking about threshold. This complex experience of interiority distinguishes it from the discipline of architecture. Thinking of the interior as distinct from architecture allows it to operate as a site of experimentation, which can disrupt our habitual attention and invite a reconsideration of the categories we employ to make useful sense of the world.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document