scholarly journals Minimizing Medical Radiation Exposure by Incorporating a New Radiation “Vital Sign” into the Electronic Medical Record: Quality of Care and Patient Safety

Author(s):  
Jonathan Lukoff
Author(s):  
Katherine Blondon ◽  
Frederic Ehrler

Patient-generated health data (PGHD), when shared with the provider, provides potential as an approach to improve quality of care. Based on interviews and a focus group with stakeholders involved in PGHD integration in the electronic medical record (EMR), we explore the benefits, barriers and possible risks. We propose solutions to address liability concerns, such as clarifying patient and provider expectations for the analyses of PGHD and emphasize considerations for future steps, which include the need to screen PGHD for patient safety.


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 111-112
Author(s):  
Elahe Gozali ◽  
Marjan Ghazisaiedi ◽  
Malihe Sadeghi ◽  
Reza Safdari

Introduction: Today, with the complexity of the process of conducting activities, the increase in diversity and the number of hospital services, and the increase in the expectations of clients - consistent with the fast technological advances - most of the hospitals in Iran have turned to mechanized systems to organize their daily activities and to register the patients' information and the care provided. One of these technologies is electronic medical records, which is known as a valuable system to evaluate patients' information in hospitals. The purpose of this paper was to examine the advantages of running electronic medical records in patient safety. Methods: This study is a review paper based on a structured review of papers published in the Google Scholar, SID, Magiran, Pubmed, and Science Direct databases (from 2007 to 2015) and the books on the benefits of implementing electronic medical records in patient safety and the related keywords. Results: Clinical information systems can have a significant effect on the quality of the outputs and patient safety. Various studies have indicated that the physicians with access to clinical guidelines and features such as computer reminders, doctors who did not have these features, presented more appropriate preventive care. Studies show that electronic medical records play a crucial role in improving the quality of patient health and safety services. Moreover, electronic medical record system is usually in connection with other technological tools: electronic drug management records,  electronic record of time and date of drug management are usually associated with bar code technology. Among the benefits of this system is the possibility to record clinical care by the treatment team, which would be especially beneficial for patient's bedside record. If the treatment personnel forgets to ask the patient a particular question, system reminds him/her. Furthermore, electronic medical record is able to remind the nurses of the patient's allergic reactions and medical history without the need for the patient to remind, which improves patient safety. Conclusion: Implementation of electronic medical records boosts up the quality of health services, patient safety, people's access to health care services, and the speed of patients treatment, leading to lower healthcare costs. Thus, considering the benefits mentioned and some other benefits of this kind, one can use this technology in clinical care provided to patients to come up with a safe and effective clinical care.


2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 217-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen M Krysko ◽  
Noah M Ivers ◽  
Jacqueline Young ◽  
Paul O’Connor ◽  
Karen Tu

Background: The increasing use of electronic medical records (EMRs) presents an opportunity to efficiently evaluate and improve quality of care for individuals with MS. Objectives: We aimed to establish an algorithm to identify individuals with MS within EMRs. Methods: We used a sample of 73,003 adult patients from 83 primary care physicians in Ontario using the Electronic Medical Record Administrative data Linked Database (EMRALD). A reference standard of 247 individuals with MS was identified through chart abstraction. The accuracy of identifying individuals with MS in an EMR was assessed using information in the cumulative patient profile (CPP), prescriptions and physician billing codes. Results: An algorithm identifying MS in the CPP performed well with 91.5% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 98.7% PPV and 100% NPV. The addition of prescriptions for MS-specific medications and physician billing code 340 used four times within any 12-month timeframe slightly improved the sensitivity to 92.3% with a PPV of 97.9%. Conclusions: Data within an EMR can be used to accurately identify patients with MS. This study has positive implications for clinicians, researchers and policy makers as it provides the potential to identify cohorts of MS patients in the primary care setting to examine quality of care.


Author(s):  
Samarpita Dutta ◽  
Nirupam Madaam ◽  
Parmeshwar Kumar

Background: Information technology is increasingly being recognized as an important tool for improving patient safety and quality of care. Use of electronic medical record has the greatest potential for improving quality in healthcare. Use of technology in a highly interactive environment such as the OPD has to be user friendly and acceptable. Therefore a study was carried out to assess the perception of clinicians regarding use of computer modules in clinical care in the outpatient departments of a tertiary care hospital in northern India.Methods: A cross sectional study was carried out over a period of two months in which 70 clinicians in the selected hospital were administered pre-designed questionnaire format for self reporting. It required them to rate their preferences regarding adoption of a computer based module for their OPDs and how this would affect their time and quality of patient care.Results: For a given computer based module in OPD, 81.4% of the clinicians supported its adoption. The mean scores suggested that most clinicians perceive that use of electronic medical record would improve quality of care. The mean scores for any of the parameters did not differ significantly amongst supporters and non-supporters of adoption of the module except on one parameter that it would be easier to follow a patient seen earlier by another clinician (p<0.05).Conclusions: Although there might be an initial resistance to change, overall clinicians perceive that introduction of electronic medical records on outpatient department would lead to improved quality of medical information management.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
rube van poelgeest ◽  
Guus Schrijvers ◽  
Albert Boonstra ◽  
Kit Roes

Abstract Background: Numerous publications show that Electronic Medical Record (EMR) systems may provide an important contribution to increasing the quality and effectiveness of care. There are indications that particularly the medical specialist plays an important role in the implementation of EMR systems in hospitals. Our goal in this study is to answer the question: which positive or negative factors influence, in the perception of medical specialists, the relation between the EMR use and the quality of medical care?Methods: To answer this question, a qualitative study was conducted in the period August until October 2018. Semi-structured interviews of around 90 minutes were held with twelve medical specialists of twelve different Dutch hospitals. For the analysis of the answers, we used the classification of factors that can influence the implementation of EMR systems based on a previously published taxonomy.Results: The participating interviewees were experienced medical specialists. Their experience within the hospitals concerned varies between 5 and 27 years. There is a spread across different types of hospitals and specialisms. When the answers received are categorised using a previously published taxonomy, the medical specialist considered technical factors the most significant barriers for EMR use to have a positive effect on quality of care, followed by the suboptimal change processes surrounding implementation. The categories ‘social’ and ‘psychological’ and ‘time’ come in at a shared third place. On the positive side, they also identified potential technical facilitators, particularly in the assured availability of information to all health professionals involved in the care of a patient. They see promise in using EMRs for medical decision support to improve quality of care, but consider these capabilities currently lacking.Conclusions: In comparison with the paper record, the interviewed medical specialists consider the digitalised record a great leap forward. Every involved health professional can access the patient data if desired at any time they need it. However, in practice, real quality improvement lags behind as long as, for instance, no one uses decision support no one uses decision support, good integrated analytic tools are missing, and the organisation of care is not adapted to these new possibilities.


Medical Care ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 43 (7) ◽  
pp. 691-698 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea L. Benin ◽  
Grace Vitkauskas ◽  
Elizabeth Thornquist ◽  
Eugene D. Shapiro ◽  
John Concato ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (S1) ◽  
pp. 36-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa M. Farmer ◽  
Lisa V. Rubenstein ◽  
Cathy D. Sherbourne ◽  
Alexis Huynh ◽  
Karen Chu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document