scholarly journals An Essay on the Division between Craft-Based and Knowledge-Based Professions as an Inhibitor of Interprofessional Healthcare Education and Practice, Part 2

2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
John E. Vitale
Keyword(s):  
Healthcare Education ◽  
Knowledge Based ◽  
Interprofessional Healthcare

Spirituality and Interprofessional Healthcare Education

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. E47-E52
Author(s):  
Cynthia Hovland ◽  
Joan Niederriter ◽  
Joan Thoman
Keyword(s):  
Healthcare Education ◽  
Interprofessional Healthcare

scholarly journals Developing a Recursive Evaluation Plan of a Complex Interprofessional Healthcare Education Initiative

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
James Scott Parrott ◽  
Patricia Findley ◽  
Matthew Rosenthal ◽  
Pamela Rothpletz-Pugila
Keyword(s):  
Interprofessional Education ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Healthcare Education ◽  
Concrete Case ◽  
Evaluation Plan ◽  
Theoretical Perspectives ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
Interprofessional Healthcare ◽  
Recursive Evaluation ◽  
Education Initiative

Background: A university interprofessional education (IPE) and interprofessional practice (IPP) initiative is a complex undertaking: incorporating multiple system levels (administration, faculty, students, patients), integrating many theoretical perspectives, and coordinating a host of individual IPE research projects. Guidance for evaluating such an IPE initiative is lacking.Methods and Findings: We describe five key challenges to evaluating the effectiveness of such an initiative, and the processes and tools we have developed to meet those challenges. We draw from recent developments in evaluation science to theoretically ground our description. Additionally, we share concrete tools we have developed in the process. By tacking between theoretical and concrete aspects of our efforts, we hope to both provide ideas for other IPE initiatives, as well as provide a basis for future research comparing cases (complex university IPE initiatives).Conclusions: While all complex IPE university initiatives are unique, we suspect that they share many common evaluation challenges. By framing these common practical challenges as common theoretical challenges, we seek to offer a description of our concrete case as well as a basis for future comparison of similar initiatives.

scholarly journals Healthcare Student Stereotypes: A Systematic Review with Implications for Interprofessional Collaboration

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Karey Cook ◽  
Judith Stoecker
Keyword(s):  
Quantitative Methods ◽  
Interprofessional Collaboration ◽  
Healthcare Education ◽  
Healthcare Students ◽  
Healthcare Environment ◽  
Patterns Of Communication ◽  
Healthcare Program ◽  
Healthcare Professions ◽  
Interprofessional Healthcare ◽  
Future Practice

Background: Stereotyping is one factor theorized to facilitate or inhibit effective interprofessional healthcare education and collaboration. The primary purpose of this paper is to systematically review the literature to determine what stereotypes are present among healthcare students about other healthcare students and practitioners. The secondary purpose of this paper is to identify the instruments most commonly used to measure stereotypes held by healthcare practitioners and students. Methods and Findings: A search of nine electronic databases identified studies that examined stereotypes among healthcare students. Studies were included if they met three search criteria: utilized quantitative methods; collected data on the stereotypes of healthcare students, including medical students, toward other healthcare students or healthcare practitioners; and included participants who were enrolled in a professional healthcare program. Thirteen studies were identified for this review. The results demonstrate that students of various healthcare professions hold stereotypes characterized by both positive and negative adjectives of students and practitioners in their own and other healthcare professions. Conclusions: The presence of stereotypes among students may have an influence on patterns of communication and collaboration during future practice in the healthcare environment. Key Words: Stereotypes, Interprofessional, Healthcare Students, Healthcare Education   

Is the Personal Always Political?

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 133-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danny Osborne ◽  
Yannick Dufresne ◽  
Gregory Eady ◽  
Jennifer Lees-Marshment ◽  
Cliff van der Linden
Keyword(s):  
Survey Data ◽  
National Survey ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
Openness To Experience ◽  
Political Sophistication ◽  
Knowledge Based

Abstract. Research demonstrates that the negative relationship between Openness to Experience and conservatism is heightened among the informed. We extend this literature using national survey data (Study 1; N = 13,203) and data from students (Study 2; N = 311). As predicted, education – a correlate of political sophistication – strengthened the negative relationship between Openness and conservatism (Study 1). Study 2 employed a knowledge-based measure of political sophistication to show that the Openness × Political Sophistication interaction was restricted to the Openness aspect of Openness. These studies demonstrate that knowledge helps people align their ideology with their personality, but that the Openness × Political Sophistication interaction is specific to one aspect of Openness – nuances that are overlooked in the literature.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document