scholarly journals Impact of Simulation Training on Undergraduate Clinical Decision-making in Emergencies: A Non-blinded, Single-centre, Randomised Pilot Study

Cureus ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Everson ◽  
Alice Gao ◽  
Carrie Roder ◽  
John Kinnear
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Simulation Training ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Single Centre

scholarly journals Clinical decision-making augmented by simulation training: neural correlates demonstrated by functional imaging: a pilot study

2014 ◽  
Vol 112 (1) ◽  
pp. 124-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.S.H. Goon ◽  
E.A. Stamatakis ◽  
R.M. Adapa ◽  
M. Kasahara ◽  
S. Bishop ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Functional Imaging ◽  
Simulation Training ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Neural Correlates

Dentists clinical decision-making for erosive tooth wear: An online pilot study

2020 ◽  
Vol 100 ◽  
pp. 103424 ◽  
Author(s):  
Micah B. Goldfarb ◽  
Gerardo Maupomé ◽  
Adam T. Hirsh ◽  
Joana C. Carvalho ◽  
George J. Eckert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Tooth Wear ◽  
Erosive Tooth Wear

scholarly journals Measuring veterinary client preferences for autonomy and information when making medical decisions for their pets

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Holli H. Seitz ◽  
Jesse G. Grady
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Small Animal ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Community Practice ◽  
Medical Decisions ◽  
Preference Index ◽  
Pet Owner ◽  
Autonomy Preference Index

Abstract OBJECTIVE To adapt the 3 scales of the Autonomy Preference Index to veterinary medicine and validate the 3 new scales to measure pet owner preferences for autonomy and information when making medical decisions for their pets. SAMPLE 10 small-animal veterinarians and 10 small-animal clients at a veterinary school–based community practice (pilot study) and 311 small-animal clients of the practice (validation study), of which 47 participated in a follow-up survey. PROCEDURES Wording of items in the Autonomy Preference Index was adapted, and instrument wording was finalized on the basis of feedback obtained in the pilot study to create 3 scales: the Veterinary General Decision-Making Preferences Scale (VGDMPS), Veterinary Clinical Decision-Making Preferences Scale (VCDMPS), and Veterinary Information-Seeking Preferences Scale (VISPS). The 3 scales were then validated by means of administering them to small-animal clients in a clinical setting. RESULTS The 3 scales had acceptable reliability and validity, but clients expressed concern over item wording in the VGDMPS during the pilot study. Overall, results showed that clients had a very high preference for information (mean ± SD VISPS score, 4.78 ± 0.36 on a scale from 1 to 5). Preferences for autonomy varied, but mean values reflected a low-to-moderate desire for autonomy in clinical decision-making (mean ± SD VCDMPS score, 2.04 ± 0.62 on a scale from 1 to 5). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE The VCDMPS was a reliable and valid instrument for measuring client preferences for autonomy in clinical decision-making. Veterinarians could potentially use this instrument to better understand pet owner preferences and tailor their communication approach accordingly.

scholarly journals Enhancing Nurse and Physician Collaboration in Clinical Decision Making Through High-fidelity Interdisciplinary Simulation Training

2011 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela M. Maxson ◽  
Eric J. Dozois ◽  
Stefan D. Holubar ◽  
Diane M. Wrobleski ◽  
Joyce A. Overman Dube ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Simulation Training ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
High Fidelity
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document