scholarly journals Epiploic Appendagitis Clinically Masquerading as an Acute Diverticulitis

Cureus ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Razan A Khafaji ◽  
Hussain S Ghandourah ◽  
Sarah K Altamimi ◽  
Afnan A Alwarthan ◽  
Renda A Alhabib ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Diverticulitis ◽  
Epiploic Appendagitis

scholarly journals Epiploic Appendagitis: An Often Misdiagnosed Cause of Acute Abdomen

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 364-368
Author(s):  
Vishnu Charan Suresh Kumar ◽  
Kishore Kumar Mani ◽  
Hisham Alwakkaa ◽  
James Shina
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Pain ◽  
Bowel Wall ◽  
Acute Diverticulitis ◽  
Lower Abdominal Pain ◽  
Wall Thickening ◽  
Antibiotic Administration ◽  
Epiploic Appendagitis ◽  
High Attenuation ◽  
History Of ◽  
Bowel Wall Thickening

Epiploic appendages are peritoneal structures that arise from the outer serosal surface of the bowel wall towards the peritoneal pouch. They are filled with adipose tissue and contain a vascular stalk. Epiploic appendagitis is a rare cause of acute lower abdominal pain. It most commonly results from torsion and inflammation of the epiploic appendages, and its clinical features mimic acute diverticulitis or acute appendicitis resulting in being often misdiagnosed as diverticulitis or appendicitis. This frequently leads to unnecessary hospitalization, antibiotic administration, and unwarranted surgeries. Epiploic appendagitis is usually diagnosed with CT imaging, and the classic CT findings include: (i) fat-density ovoid lesion (hyperattenuating ring sign), (ii) mild bowel wall thickening, and (iii) a central high-attenuation focus within the fatty lesion (central dot sign). It is treated conservatively, and symptoms typically resolve in a few days. Therefore, epiploic appendagitis should be considered as one of the differential diagnosis for acute lower abdominal pain and prompt diagnosis of epiploic appendagitis can avoid unnecessary hospitalization and surgical intervention. In this case report, we discuss a 72-year-old woman who presented with a 2-day history of acute left lower abdominal pain.

scholarly journals CT imaging findings of epiploic appendagitis: an unusual cause of abdominal pain

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dario Giambelluca ◽  
Roberto Cannella ◽  
Giovanni Caruana ◽  
Leonardo Salvaggio ◽  
Emanuele Grassedonio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Pain ◽  
Acute Abdominal Pain ◽  
Acute Diverticulitis ◽  
Abdominal Cavity ◽  
Imaging Features ◽  
Imaging Findings ◽  
Hernia Sac ◽  
Epiploic Appendagitis ◽  
High Attenuation ◽  
Epiploic Appendage

AbstractEpiploic appendagitis is a rare cause of acute abdominal pain, determined by a benign self-limiting inflammation of the epiploic appendages. It may manifest with heterogeneous clinical presentations, mimicking other more severe entities responsible of acute abdominal pain, such as acute diverticulitis or appendicitis. Given its importance as clinical mimicker, imaging plays a crucial role to avoid inaccurate diagnosis that may lead to unnecessary hospitalization, antibiotic therapy, and surgery. CT represents the gold standard technique for the evaluation of patients with indeterminate acute abdominal pain. Imaging findings include the presence of an oval lesion with fat-attenuation surrounded by a thin hyperdense rim on CT (“hyperattenuating ring sign”) abutting anteriorly the large bowel, usually associated with inflammation of the adjacent mesentery. A central high-attenuation focus within the fatty lesion (“central dot sign”) can sometimes be observed and is indicative of a central thrombosed vein within the inflamed epiploic appendage. Rarely, epiploic appendagitis may be located within a hernia sac or attached to the vermiform appendix. Chronically infarcted epiploic appendage may detach, appearing as an intraperitoneal loose calcified body in the abdominal cavity. In this review, we aim to provide an overview of the clinical presentation and key imaging features that may help the radiologist to make an accurate diagnosis and guide the clinical management of those patients.

scholarly journals An Uncommon Cause of Acute Abdominal Pain: Primary Epiploic Appendagitis in the Emergency Setting

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (1&2) ◽  
pp. 17
Author(s):  
Scott D. Casey ◽  
Joseph DiVito Jr. ◽  
Jason B. Lupow ◽  
Reshma Gulani
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Abdominal Pain ◽  
Emergency Physician ◽  
Acute Abdominal Pain ◽  
Acute Diverticulitis ◽  
Emergency Setting ◽  
Imaging Studies ◽  
Epiploic Appendagitis ◽  
Medical Interventions

In the emergency setting, the diagnosis of benign causes of acute abdominal pain can prevent unnecessary medical interventions. To illustrate this point, we report the case of a 28-year-old man who presented to the emer- gency department with symptoms suggestive of acute diverticulitis. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) established, instead, a diagnosis of primary epiploic appendagitis (PEA), which was managed expectantly. The patient’s symptoms resolved within one week of hospital discharge and he remained free of pain at a five-month phone follow-up. Increased awareness of PEA and its self-limited course can help the emergency physician avoid unnecessary imaging studies and expectantly manage this cause of acute abdominal pain. 

Epiploic Appendagitis: An Often Unrecognized Cause of Abdominal Pain

Consultant ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Doris Lin ◽  
Jeffrey J. Carlson
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Pain ◽  
Epiploic Appendagitis

Yield of colonoscopy after recent CT-proven uncomplicated acute diverticulitis: a comparative cohort study

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (9) ◽  
pp. 2605-2613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lidewine Daniels ◽  
Çağdaş Ünlü ◽  
Thomas R. de Wijkerslooth ◽  
Hein B. Stockmann ◽  
Ernst J. Kuipers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Acute Diverticulitis ◽  
Comparative Cohort Study

scholarly journals Risk of colectomy after conservative treatment of diverticulitis of the left hemicolon complicated by abdominal or pelvic abscess: protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. e042350
Author(s):  
Maximilian Sohn ◽  
Ayman Agha ◽  
Igors Iesalnieks ◽  
Anna Tiefes ◽  
Alfred Hochrein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Emergency Surgery ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Acute Diverticulitis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Pelvic Abscess ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Review Manager

IntroductionAcute diverticulitis of the sigmoid colon is increasingly treated by a non-operative approach. The need for colectomy after recovery from a flare of acute diverticulitis of the left colon, complicated diverticular abscess is still controversial. The primary aim of this study is to assess the risk of interval emergency surgery by systematic review and meta-analysis.Methods and analysisThe systematic review and meta-analysis will be conducted in accordance to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols statement. PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and EMBASE will be screened for the predefined searching term: (Diverticulitis OR Diverticulum) AND (Abscess OR pelvic abscess OR pericolic abscess OR intraabdominal abscess) AND (surgery OR operation OR sigmoidectomy OR drainage OR percutaneous drainage OR conservative therapy OR watchful waiting). All studies published in an English or German-speaking peer-reviewed journal will be suitable for this analysis. Case reports, case series of less than five patients, studies without follow-up information, systematic and non-systematic reviews and meta-analyses will be excluded. Primary endpoint is the rate of interval emergency surgery. Using the Review Manager Software (Review Manager/RevMan, V.5.3, Copenhagen, The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2012) meta-analysis will be pooled using the Mantel-Haenszel method for random effects. The Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool will be used to assess methodological quality of non-randomised studies. Risk of bias in randomised studies will be assessed using the Cochrane developed RoB 2-tool.Ethics and disseminationAs no new data are being collected, ethical approval is exempt for this study. This systematic review is to provide a new insight on the need for surgical treatment after a first attack of acute diverticulitis, complicated by intra-abdominal or pelvic abscesses. The results of this study will be presented at national and international meetings and published in a peer-reviewed journal.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020164813.

scholarly journals Role of MSCT in the diagnosis of perforated gall bladder (a retrospective study)

2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed M. Harraz ◽  
Ahmed H. Abouissa
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Gall Bladder ◽  
Acute Cholecystitis ◽  
Acute Diverticulitis ◽  
Wall Thickening ◽  
Free Fluid ◽  
Iodinated Contrast ◽  
Contrast Enhanced

Abstract Background Although gall bladder perforation (GBP) is not common, it is considered a life-threating condition, and the possibility of occurrence in cases of acute cholecystitis must be considered. The aim of this study was to assess the role of multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) in the assessment of GBP. Results It is a retrospective study including 19 patients that had GBP out of 147, there were 11 females (57.8%) and 8 males (42.1%), aged 42 to 79 year (mean age 60) presented with acute abdomen or acute cholecystitis. All patients were examined with abdominal ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced abdominal MSCT after written informed consent was obtained from the patients. This study was between January and December 2018. Patients with contraindications to contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) (pregnancy, acute kidney failure, or allergy to iodinated contrast agents) who underwent US only were excluded. Patients with other diagnoses, such as acute diverticulitis of the right-sided colon or acute appendicitis, were excluded. The radiological findings were evaluated such as GB distention; stones; wall thickening, enhancement, and defect; pericholecystic free fluid or collection; enhancement of liver parenchyma; and air in the wall or lumen. All CT findings are compared with the surgical results. Our results revealed that the most important and diagnostic MSCT finding in GBP is a mural defect. Nineteen patients were proved surgically to have GBP. Conclusion GBP is a rare but very serious condition and should be diagnosed and treated as soon as possible to decrease morbidity and mortality. The most accurate diagnostic tool is the CT, MSCT findings most specific and sensitive for the detection of GBP and its complications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document