scholarly journals Placenta Percreta Complications

Cureus ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danyon J Anderson ◽  
Hefei Liu ◽  
Devesh Kumar ◽  
Mit Patel ◽  
Simon Kim
Keyword(s):  
Placenta Percreta

Placenta percreta: Diagnostik und Therapie, Fallserie (n=7)

2004 ◽  
Vol 207 (S 2) ◽  
Author(s):  
B Tutschek ◽  
F Chantraine ◽  
G Crombach ◽  
W Henrich
Keyword(s):  
Placenta Percreta ◽  
Diagnostik Und Therapie

Uterine conservation in patient with consecutive double placenta percreta

2000 ◽  
Vol 79 (10) ◽  
pp. 900-901
Author(s):  
Jose M. Palacios Jaraquemada ◽  
Gustavo Pan
Keyword(s):  
Placenta Percreta

scholarly journals VP46.02: Misclassification of placenta percreta: surgical disruption of the serosa

2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (S1) ◽  
pp. 268-268
Author(s):  
B. Einerson ◽  
A. Kennedy ◽  
J. Comstock ◽  
P. Woodward
Keyword(s):  
Placenta Percreta

scholarly journals Prophylactic Hypogastric Artery Ligation during Placenta Percreta Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 08 (02) ◽  
pp. e142-e145
Author(s):  
Theresa Kuhn ◽  
Kristina Martimucci ◽  
Abdulla Al-Khan ◽  
Robyn Bilinski ◽  
Stacy Zamudio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Placenta Percreta ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Distributed Data ◽  
Hypogastric Artery ◽  
Blood Products ◽  
Artery Ligation ◽  
Cesarean Hysterectomy

Objective To evaluate if prophylactic hypogastric artery ligation (HAL) decreases surgical blood loss and blood products transfused. Study Design This is a retrospective cohort study comparing patients with placenta percreta undergoing prophylactic HAL at the time of cesarean hysterectomy versus those who did not. Data were presented as means ± standard deviations, proportions, or medians with interquartile ranges. Demographic and clinical data were compared in the groups using Student's t-test for normally distributed data or the Mann–Whitney U test for nonnormally distributed data. Fisher's exact test was used for proportions and categorical variables. Data are reported as significant where p was <0.05. Results There were 26 patients included in the control group with no HAL and 11 patients included in the study group. Estimated blood loss for the study group was 1,000 mL versus 800 mL in the control. Units of PRCBs transfused were 4.5 units in the study group versus 2 units for the control group. None of these measures were found to be statistically significant. Conclusion Our data suggest there was no benefit in the use of prophylactic HAL in decreasing surgical blood loss or amount of blood products transfused in patients who had a cesarean hysterectomy performed for placenta percreta. Précis Prophylactic HAL does not decrease blood loss during surgery for placenta percreta.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document