scholarly journals Multilevel L4 and L5 Corpectomy for Burst Fracture via an Anterior Transperitoneal Approach Followed by Posterior Stabilization: Technical and Anatomic Considerations

Cureus ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly Gassie ◽  
Young Erben ◽  
Susana Fortich ◽  
Gian P Carames ◽  
Sukhwinder Johnny S Sandhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Burst Fracture ◽  
Transperitoneal Approach ◽  
Posterior Stabilization ◽  
L5 Corpectomy

scholarly journals A Rare Case of Contiguous Three-level Lumbar Burst Fractures-treated with Combined Posterior Stabilization and Anterior Fusion

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Charanjit Singh Dhillon ◽  
Ahamed Shafeek Nanakkal ◽  
Nilay Prafulsinh Chhasatia ◽  
Narendra Reddy Medagam ◽  
Anandkumar Khatavi
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
English Literature ◽  
Burst Fracture ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Individual Characteristics ◽  
Neurological Deficits ◽  
Surgical Approaches ◽  
Anterior Fusion ◽  
Posterior Stabilization ◽  
Burst Fractures

Introduction: Burst fractures occur frequently in high energy trauma and are commonly associated with falls from height and road traffic accidents. While multiple burst fractures are not uncommon in thoracic spine, three or more contiguous level burst fractures are a relative rarity especially, in lumbar spine. The treatment of multilevel burst fractures must be individualized, and each fracture should be treated according to its inherent stability. To the best of our knowledge, this is the only case of such injury reported in English literature. Case Report: A 17-year-old girl who sustained contiguous three-level lumbar burst fractures with neurological compromise following alleged history of fall from height. Radiographs/computed tomography scan revealed burst fractures of L2, L3, and L4 vertebrae with retropulsion of bony fragments at all the levels. Patient underwent minimally invasive posterior stabilization and anterior Hemi-corpectomy of L2, L4, and fusion. The patient recovered completely from neurological deficits by the end of 6 months. Conclusion: Multiple contiguous burst fractures in the lumbar spine are a rare entity. To the best of our knowledge, this is the only case of such injury reported in English literature. The treatment requires a thorough assessment of the fracture pattern and often requires a combination of surgical approaches. Each fracture merits treatment based on individual characteristics of fracture patterns and the amount of canal compromise at each level. Keywords: Lumbar, burst fracture, multiple, contiguous.

scholarly journals Technical nuances of a posterior-only L5 vertebrectomy with anterior column reconstruction

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 325
Author(s):  
Lukasz Bogdan ◽  
Michael Galgano
Keyword(s):  
Cauda Equina Syndrome ◽  
Motor Vehicle ◽  
Motor Vehicle Accident ◽  
Burst Fracture ◽  
Cauda Equina ◽  
Spinal Stability ◽  
Vehicle Accident ◽  
Anterior Column Reconstruction ◽  
L5 Corpectomy ◽  
Anterior Posterior

Background: Burst fractures involving the L5 vertebra are quite rare . They can be managed with anterior, posterior, or combined 360 approaches. Here, we report a 25-year-old female who presented with a traumatic cauda equina syndrome attributed to an L5 burst fracture following a motor vehicle accident, and who did well after a posterior-only decompression/fusion. Case Description: A 25-year-old female presented with a traumatic cauda equina syndrome attributed to an L5 burst fracture following a motor vehicle accident. She was treated with a posterior-only vertebrectomy and followed for 5 postoperative months. During this time, she experienced complete resolution of her preoperative neurological deficit and demonstrated radiographically confirmed spinal stability. Conclusion: One of the major pros for the all-posterior L5 corpectomy as in this case, was that the patient underwent a successful single-stage, single-position operation. However, the posterior-only L5 corpectomy approach is technically demanding, and only allows for the placement of a lower profile interbody cage.

Surgical treatment of cervical spine fractures in ankylosing spondylitis patients: posterior stabilization using intraoperative CT scanner-based navigation

2020 ◽  
Vol 99 (5) ◽  
pp. 212-218
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Spine ◽  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Ct Imaging ◽  
Spine Fracture ◽  
Cervical Spine Fracture ◽  
Posterior Stabilization ◽  
Visceral Injury ◽  
Intraoperative Ct ◽  
Screw Insertion ◽  
Spinal Navigation

Introduction: The authors analyzed a series of ankylosing spondylitis patients with cervical spine fracture undergoing posterior stabilization using spinal navigation based on intraoperative CT imaging. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and safety of navigated posterior stabilization and to analyze the adequacy of this method for treatment of fractures in ankylosed cervical spine. Methods: Prospectively collected clinical data, together with radiological documentation of a series of 8 consecutive patients with 9 cervical spine fracture were included in the analysis. The evaluation of screw insertion accuracy based on postoperative CT imaging, description of instrumentation- related complications and evaluation of morphological and clinical results were the subjects of interest. Results: Of the 66 implants inserted in all cervical levels and in upper thoracic spine, only 3 screws (4.5%) did not meet the criteria of anatomically correct insertion. Neither screw malposition nor any other intraoperative events were complicated by any neural, vascular or visceral injury. Thus we did not find a reason to change implant position intraoperatively or during the postoperative period. The quality of intraoperative CT imaging in our group of patients was sufficient for reliable trajectory planning and implant insertion in all segments, irrespective of the habitus, positioning method and comorbidities. In addition to stabilization of the fracture, the posterior approach also allows reducing preoperative kyphotic position of the cervical spine. In all patients, we achieved a stable situation with complete bone fusion of the anterior part of the spinal column and lateral masses at one year follow-up. Conclusion: Spinal navigation based on intraoperative CT imaging has proven to be a reliable and safe method of stabilizing cervical spine with ankylosing spondylitis. The strategy of posterior stabilization seems to be a suitable method providing high primary stability and the conditions for a subsequent high fusion rate.

Controversies in Managing of Thoracic-Lumbar Upper Burst Fractures

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sahat Edison Sitorus
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Posterior Instrumentation ◽  
Burst Fracture ◽  
Surgical Decompression ◽  
Neurologic Deficit ◽  
Retroperitoneal Approach ◽  
Burst Fractures ◽  
Lateral Fixation

Upper burst fracture of Th12-L1 has unique anatomy because it contains lower spinal cord, medullary cone, and diaphragm which separates between the thoracic and lumbar spine.The presence or absence of neurologic deficit is the single most important factor in the decision making. The presence of profound but incomplete neural deficit in association with canal compromise represents an urgent indication of surgical decompression. Antero-lateral direct decompression with trans-thoracic trans-pleural–retroperitoneal approach given the proximity the cord and conus is the most effective method, with inter-vertebral instrumentation with or without lateral fixation or posterior instrumentation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document