scholarly journals Peripheral Artery Disease as a Risk Factor for Myocardial Infarction

Cureus ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erick Leonel Pérez Mejia ◽  
Sila Mateo Faxas ◽  
Nicole Tejeda Taveras ◽  
Abdul Subhan Talpur ◽  
Kumar Jitesh ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Andrew W. Gardner ◽  
Petar Alaupovic ◽  
Donald E. Parker ◽  
Polly S. Montgomery ◽  
Omar L. Esponda ◽  
...  

Apolipoprotein B is a stronger predictor of myocardial infarction than LDL cholesterol, and it is inversely related to physical activity and modifiable with exercise training. As such, apolipoprotein measures may be of particular relevance for subjects with PAD and claudication. We compared plasma apolipoprotein profiles in 29 subjects with peripheral artery disease (PAD) and intermittent claudication and in 39 control subjects. Furthermore, we compared the plasma apolipoprotein profiles of subjects with PAD either treated (n=17) or untreated (n=12) with statin medications. For the apolipoprotein subparticle analyses, subjects with PAD had higher age-adjusted Lp-B:C (P<0.05) and lower values of Lp-A-I:A-II (P<0.05) than controls. The PAD group taking statins had lower age-adjusted values for apoB (P<0.05), Lp-A-II:B:C:D:E (P<0.05), Lp-B:E + Lp-B:C:E (P<0.05), Lp-B:C (P<0.05), and Lp-A-I (P<0.05) than the untreated PAD group. Subjects with PAD have impaired apolipoprotein profiles than controls, characterized by Lp-B:C and Lp-A-I:A-II. Furthermore, subjects with PAD on statin medications have a more favorable risk profile, particularly noted in multiple apolipoprotein subparticles. The efficacy of statin therapy to improve cardiovascular risk appears more evident in the apolipoprotein sub-particle profile than in the more traditional lipid profile of subjects with PAD and claudication. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.govNCT00618670.


2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 296-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Vanassche ◽  
Peter Verhamme ◽  
Sonia S Anand ◽  
Olga Shestakovska ◽  
Keith AA Fox ◽  
...  

Aims Secondary prevention in patients with coronary artery disease and peripheral artery disease involves antithrombotic therapy and optimal control of cardiovascular risk factors. In the Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies (COMPASS) study, adding low-dose rivaroxaban on top of aspirin lowered cardiovascular events, but there is limited data about risk factor control in secondary prevention. We studied the association between risk factor status and outcomes, and the impact of risk factor status on the treatment effect of rivaroxaban, in a large contemporary population of patients with coronary artery disease or peripheral artery disease. Methods and results We reported ischemic events (cardiovascular death, stroke, or myocardial infarction) in participants from the randomized, double-blind COMPASS study by individual risk factor (blood pressure, smoking status, cholesterol level, presence of diabetes, body mass index, and level of physical activity), and by number of risk factors. We compared rates and hazard ratios of patients treated with rivaroxaban plus aspirin vs aspirin alone within each risk factor category and tested for interaction between risk factor status and antithrombotic regimen. Complete baseline risk factor status was available in 27,117 (99%) patients. Status and number of risk factors were both associated with increased risk of ischemic events. Rates of ischemic events (hazard ratio 2.2; 95% confidence interval 1.8–2.6) and cardiovascular death (hazard ratio 2.0; 1.5–2.7) were more than twofold higher in patients with 4–6 compared with 0–1 risk factors ( p < 0.0001 for both). Rivaroxaban reduced event rates independently of the number of risk factors ( p interaction 0.93), with the largest absolute benefit in patients with the highest number of risk factors. Conclusion More favorable risk factor status and low-dose rivaroxaban were independently associated with lower risk of cardiovascular events.


2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 482-487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tilak Pasala ◽  
Jennifer Soo Hoo ◽  
Mary Kate Lockhart ◽  
Rehan Waheed ◽  
Prasanna Sengodan ◽  
...  

Antiplatelet therapy reduces the risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, and vascular death in patients who have symptomatic peripheral artery disease. However, a subset of patients who take aspirin continues to have recurrent cardiovascular events. There are few data on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with peripheral artery disease who manifest aspirin resistance. Patients with peripheral artery disease on long-term aspirin therapy (≥4 wk) were tested for aspirin responsiveness by means of the VerifyNow Aspirin Assay. The mean follow-up duration was 22.6 ± 8.3 months. The primary endpoint was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke. Secondary endpoints were the incidence of vascular interventions (surgical or percutaneous), or of amputation or gangrene caused by vascular disease. Of the 120 patients enrolled in the study, 31 (25.8%) were aspirin-resistant and 89 (74.2%) were aspirin-responsive. The primary endpoint occurred in 10 (32.3%) patients in the aspirin-resistant group and in 13 (14.6%) patients in the aspirin-responsive group (hazard ratio=2.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.08–5.66; P=0.03). There was no significant difference in the secondary outcome of revascularization or tissue loss. By multivariate analysis, aspirin resistance and history of chronic kidney disease were the only independent predictors of long-term adverse cardiovascular events. Aspirin resistance is highly prevalent in patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease and is an independent predictor of adverse cardiovascular risk. Whether intervening in these patients with additional antiplatelet therapies would improve outcomes needs to be explored.


Open Heart ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e001004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rubina Attar ◽  
Axel Wester ◽  
Sasha Koul ◽  
Svend Eggert ◽  
Pontus Andell

AimTo describe the population of patients with previously diagnosed peripheral artery disease (PAD) experiencing a myocardial infarction (MI) and to investigate 1-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE: all-cause mortality, reinfarction, stroke and heart failure hospitalisation) following MI.BackgroundMI patients with PAD constitute a high-risk population with adverse cardiac outcomes. Contemporary real-life data regarding the clinical characteristics of this patient population and clinical event rates following MI remain scarce.MethodsThis observational study included all MI patients presenting with ST-elevation MI or non-ST-elevation MI between 01 January 2005 and 31 December 2014 with (n=4213) and without (n=106 763) a concurrent PAD diagnosis, identified in the nationwide Swedish Web-system for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-based care in Heart disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies registry and the National Patient Registry (PAD prevalence: 3.8%). Cox proportional hazard models were applied to compare the outcome between the two populations.ResultsMI patients with PAD were older and more often burdened with comorbidities, such as diabetes, hypertension and previous MI. After adjustments, PAD was significantly associated with higher rates of MACE (HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.27 to 1.44), mortality (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.43 to 1.76), reinfarction (HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.32 to 1.66), stroke (HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.53), heart failure (HR 1.29, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.40) and bleeding (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.47) at 1 year.ConclusionA concurrent PAD diagnosis was independently significantly associated with higher rates of adverse outcomes following MI in a nationwide real-life MI population. The low prevalence of PAD compared with previous studies suggests significant underdiagnosing. Future studies should investigate if PAD screening with ankle–brachial index may increase diagnosing and subsequently lead to improved treatment of polyvascular disease


VASA ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 403-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dietmar Krause ◽  
Ina Burghaus ◽  
Ulrich Thiem ◽  
Ulrike S. Trampisch ◽  
Matthias Trampisch ◽  
...  

Abstract. Background: To assess the risk of peripheral artery disease (PAD) in older adults and the contribution of traditional and novel risk factors to the incidence of PAD. Patients and methods: 344 general practitioners (GPs), trained by vascular specialists all over Germany, enrolled 6,880 unselected participants aged 65 years or older (getABI study). The onset of PAD was determined by a regression method in the course of repeated measurements of the ankle brachial index (ABI) over seven years. PAD onset was defined by the declining linear regression ABI line reaching 0.9 or by PAD symptoms. Results: The cumulative PAD incidence over seven years was 12.9%, corresponding to an incidence rate of 20.3 per 1000 person years (95% confidence interval [95%CI] 18.8 to 21.7). Logistic regression analysis showed that traditional risk factors contributed significantly to the risk of PAD: current smoker status (odds ratio 2.65, 95%CI 2.08 to 3.37), diabetes (1.35, 95%CI 1.13 to 1.62), and low-density lipoprotein >130 mg/dl (1.26, 95%CI 1.07 to 1.48). Three novel risk factor candidates showed significant impact on PAD incidence: elevated sensitive C-reactive protein level (1.23, 95%CI 1.05 to 1.45), impaired estimated glomerular filtration rate (1.27, 95%CI 1.03 to 1.56), and elevated homocysteine level (1.19, 95%CI 1.01 to 1.41). Conclusions: Older adults in Germany have a PAD risk of 12.9% per seven years. Potentially modifiable traditional PAD risk factors yield high impact on PAD incidence. Novel risk factor candidates may contribute to the risk of PAD


2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Kamil ◽  
T S G Sehested ◽  
K Houlind ◽  
J F Lassen ◽  
G Gislason ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Over the past decades there has been a shift in cardiovascular (CV) risk factors with improved outcomes. Updated trends in incidence of myocardial infarction (MI) and heart failure (HF) in peripheral artery disease (PAD) are warranted. Purpose We aimed to investigate trends in the incidence of MI, HF, and CV mortality in PAD patients during the past two decades. Methods Nationwide registers were used to identify all patients aged ≥18 years, with first-time diagnosis of PAD between 1997 and 2016. Age-standardized incidence rates per 1,000 person-years (IR) were calculated to estimate trends of MI, HF, and CV mortality. Furthermore, risk of MI, HF, and CV mortality was estimated by 1-year cumulative-incidence with death as competing risk. Results A total of 136,746 patients with first-time diagnosis of PAD were included. Mean age was 70.01 [IQR 61–77 years], and 53.05% of the identified patients were male. The 1-year cumulative-incidence of MI in patients with PAD were 1.88% for year 1997–2000, 2.12% for year 2001–2005, 1.59% for year 2006–2010, and 1.32% for year 2011–2016, respectively. The 1-year cumulative-incidence of HF in patients with PAD were 1.71%, 1.48%, 1.25%, and 1.11% for the 1997–2000, 2001–2005, 2006–2010, and 2011–2016 year-groups, respectively. Furthermore the 1-year cumulative-incidence of CV mortality in patients with PAD were 12.0%, 9.41%, 8.75%, and 7.80% for the 1997–2000, 2001–2005, 2006–2010, and 2011–2016 year-groups, respectively. Likewise, the age-standardized incidence rates pr. 1,000 person-years showed increasing trends of MI up until 2002 with an estimated annual percent change (APC) of +0.6 (95% CI 3.3–16.1, p-value 0.2). After year 2002 the IR decreased significantly with an estimated APC of −5.0 (95% CI 3.7–6.3, p&lt;0.0001). The age-standardized IR for HF decreased with an estimated APC of −3.3 (95% CI 2.0–4.6, p&lt;0.0001), and similarly for CV death decreased by −3.5 (95% CI 3.0–4.0, p&lt;0.0001). Conclusion The incidence of MI and HF in patients with PAD has significantly decreased over time together with a subsequent decline in CV mortality. This may suggest that the improvements in preventive strategies aimed at reducing CV risk are effective and contributes to lower incidence of MI and HF and thereby improved mortality rates in the past two decades. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.


Author(s):  
E. Sebastian Debus ◽  
Mark R. Nehler ◽  
Nicholas Govsyeyev ◽  
Rupert M. Bauersachs ◽  
Sonia S. Anand ◽  
...  

Background: Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) requiring lower extremity revascularization (LER) are at high risk of adverse limb and cardiovascular events. VOYAGER PAD demonstrated that rivaroxaban significantly reduced this risk. The efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban has not been described in patients who underwent surgical LER. Methods: The VOYAGER PAD trial randomized patients with PAD after surgical and endovascular LER to rivaroxaban 2.5mg twice daily plus aspirin or matching placebo plus aspirin and followed for a median of 28 months. The primary endpoint was a composite of acute limb ischemia, major vascular amputation, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or cardiovascular death. The principal safety outcome was Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) major bleeding. International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) bleeding was a secondary safety outcome. All efficacy and safety outcomes were adjudicated by a blinded independent committee. Results: Of the 6564 randomized, 2185 (33%) underwent surgical LER and 4379 (67%) endovascular. Compared to placebo, rivaroxaban reduced the primary endpoint consistently regardless of LER method (p-interaction 0.43). Following surgical LER, the primary efficacy outcome occurred in 199 (18.4%) patients in the rivaroxaban group and 242 (22.0%) patients in the placebo group with a cumulative incidence at 3 years of 19.7% and 23.9%, respectively (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.67 - 0.98; p=0.026). In the overall trial, TIMI major bleeding and ISTH major bleeding were increased with rivaroxaban. There was no heterogeneity for TIMI major bleeding (p-interaction 0.17) or ISTH major bleeding (p-interaction 0.73) based on LER approach. Following surgical LER, the principal safety outcome occurred in 11 (1.0%) patients in the rivaroxaban group and 13 (1.2%) patients in the placebo group; 3-year cumulative incidence 1.3% and 1.4% respectively (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.39-1.95; p=0.75) Among surgical patients, the composite of fatal bleeding or intracranial hemorrhage (p=0.95) and postprocedural bleeding requiring intervention (p=0.93) were not significantly increased. Conclusions: The efficacy of rivaroxaban is associated with a benefit in surgical LER patients. While bleeding was increased with rivaroxaban plus aspirin, the incidence was low, with no significant increase in fatal bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage or postprocedural bleeds requiring intervention. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov Unique Identifier: NCT02504216


2016 ◽  
Vol 67 (23) ◽  
pp. 2719-2728 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc P. Bonaca ◽  
Deepak L. Bhatt ◽  
Robert F. Storey ◽  
Ph. Gabriel Steg ◽  
Marc Cohen ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Katriina Heikkilä ◽  
Jaana Pentti ◽  
Ida E. H. Madsen ◽  
Tea Lallukka ◽  
Marianna Virtanen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document