scholarly journals Prospective Study Showing Results of Large-Diameter Femoral Heads After Cementless Total Hip Replacement

Cureus ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gur Aziz Singh Sidhu ◽  
Harjot Kaur ◽  
Hakam Singh ◽  
Jamie Hind ◽  
Neil Ashwood
Keyword(s):  
Prospective Study ◽  
Total Hip Replacement ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
Large Diameter ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Femoral Heads ◽  
Cementless Total Hip Replacement

scholarly journals Confronting hip resurfacing and big femoral head replacement gait analysis

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Panagiotis K. Karampinas ◽  
Dimitrios S. Evangelopoulos ◽  
John Vlamis ◽  
Konstantinos Nikolopoulos ◽  
Dimitrios S. Korres
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Replacement ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
Postural Balance ◽  
Large Diameter ◽  
Hip Resurfacing ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Femoral Heads ◽  
Bone Preservation ◽  
Hip Kinematics ◽  
Overall Performance

Improved hip kinematics and bone preservation have been reported after resurfacing total hip replacement (THRS). On the other hand, hip kinematics with standard total hip replacement (THR) is optimized with large diameter femoral heads (BFH-THR). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the functional outcomes of THRS and BFH-THR and correlate these results to bone preservation or the large femoral heads. Thirty-one patients were included in the study. Gait speed, postural balance, proprioception and overall performance. Our results demonstrated a non-statistically significant improvement in gait, postural balance and proprioception in the THRS confronting to BFH-THR group. THRS provide identical outcomes to traditional BFH-THR. The THRS choice as bone preserving procedure in younger patients is still to be evaluated.

Preoperative use of epoietin beta in total hip replacement: a prospective study

2009 ◽  
Vol 130 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Michel Laffosse ◽  
Vincent Minville ◽  
Philippe Chiron ◽  
Aline Colombani ◽  
Claude Gris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prospective Study ◽  
Total Hip Replacement ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
A Prospective Study

SHALL IT BE BETTER, AS AN APPROACH FOR THR, POSTERIORLY OR LATERALLY; A CLINICO-FUNCTIONAL AND GAIT ANALYTICAL OUTCOME ANALYSIS, IN A PROSPECTIVE STUDY, IN THE SOUTH-INDIAN POPULATION.

2021 ◽  
pp. 71-75
Author(s):  
Arun Kumar C ◽  
Ganashree S ◽  
Arivoli S ◽  
Aswath C A ◽  
Rakesh Kumar B ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prospective Study ◽  
Total Hip Replacement ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
Posterior Approach ◽  
Lateral Approach ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
South Indian Population ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
South Indian

Introduction: Hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) or Total hip replacement (THR), as it is popularly called, attempts to mollify these basic clinical problems, in patients with a hip arthritic problem, which may be of a sequela to age-related degeneration, osteonecrosis, systemic disorder like Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or Ankylosing spondylosis (AS) or as a result of trauma and or an old infection. The basic pathology, is an unfavourable and abrading hip diarthrodial joint. The endeavour of the study was, to establish the efcacy of the Posterior vs Lateral approach for THA/THR, by studying their outcomes in primary THR. This prospective study was undertaken at Che Materials And Methods: ttinad Hospital and Research Institute (CARE), Kelambakkam, Chengalpattu district, Tamilnadu, In the Department of Orthopaedics from Jan 2017 to Dec 2020 (48 months). The Functional outcome of hip surgery was measured using the Harris Hip Score, Oxford hip score and the WOMAC. Rivermead visual gait analysis (RVGA) method was used post-operatively to assess the gait. The Biomechanical outcomes of Abductor Gait Component, were individually assessed by EMG studies. The Harris Hip Score, The Oxford Hip S Results: core and WOMAC score, when the lateral approach was compared to the posterior approach pre-op and post-op in the 12 months minimum follow-up period, the laterally approached group faired better. The VAS score was equivocal. The comprehensive RVGA assessment also showed marginally better results for the laterally approached group as was the case with the Trendelenburg test score. The EMG studies for the Gluteus Maximus, Medius and the lateral rotators of hip also favoured the outcomes for the laterally approach hips. The supremacy of the Lateral Approach, ove Conclusion: r Posterior Approach, cannot be adjudged in a short-term follow-up study. It is thus opined that the Lateral Approach may be statistically and data wise superior, but the patient satisfaction, which is a major factor, is almost the same in both the approach groups. The follow-up needs to be atleast for a decade for us to be able to come to any meaningful conclusion. With regards to surgery like the Total hip replacement, which have a longevity factor exceeding 10 years, studies have to be followed up for periods in excess of 10 years.

METALLIC WEAR DEBRIS IN ACETABULAR OSTEOLYSIS IN A MECHANICALLY STABLE CEMENTLESS TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT: REPORT OF A CASE

Orthopedics ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. 1277-1281
Author(s):  
Michael H Huo ◽  
Foster Betts ◽  
George P Bogumill ◽  
Peter I Kenmore ◽  
Richard J Hayek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Replacement ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
Wear Debris ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Cementless Total Hip Replacement ◽  
Acetabular Osteolysis
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document