scholarly journals Single-Bundle Versus Double-Bundle Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison of Long-Term Functional Outcomes

Cureus ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vicknesh Anandan ◽  
Teik Chiang Goh ◽  
Kamarul Syariza Zamri
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Double Bundle ◽  
Single Bundle ◽  
Bundle Versus ◽  
Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

scholarly journals An in vitro biomechanical comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: single bundle versus anatomical double bundle techniques

Clinics ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Umeda Sasaki ◽  
Roberto Freire da Mota e Albuquerque ◽  
César Augusto Martins Pereira ◽  
Guilherme Simões Gouveia ◽  
Júlio César Rodrigues Vilela ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Double Bundle ◽  
Single Bundle ◽  
Bundle Versus ◽  
Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Biomechanical Comparison

scholarly journals Pain Following Single-bundle versus Double-bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (F) ◽  
pp. 153-162
Author(s):  
Ludwig A. P. Pontoh ◽  
H. Dilogo Ismail ◽  
Jessica Fiolin ◽  
Oliver Emmanuel Yausep
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Double Bundle ◽  
Surrounding Tissue ◽  
Single Bundle ◽  
Bundle Versus ◽  
Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

BACKGROUND: Double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has been known to result in better functional outcomes, joint stability, and lower revision rates compared to single-bundle (SB) ACLR. However, given the increased invasiveness and damage to the surrounding tissue area, it is proposed that it may be associated with increased pain. AIM: This review aims to gather all studies and literature that reported pain as an outcome when comparing SB versus DB ACLR. METHODS: Literature searching was conducted across seven search engines for studies reporting pain as an outcome and comparing SB versus DB ACLR. RESULTS: Eight studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the study. Overall, the studies show variable findings regarding pain in DB compared to SB ACLR, with the only statistically significant results from two studies indicating that DB ACLR is associated with more pain than SB ACLR. CONCLUSION: Based on the limited evidence available, no conclusions can be made regarding the pain experienced between people receiving either procedure. This constitutes a need for additional studies with increased follow-up time periods, larger sample size, and better study design.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document