scholarly journals Solid Papillary Carcinoma of Breast: Clinicopathologic Comparison With Conventional Ductal Carcinoma of Breast

Cureus ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atif A Hashmi ◽  
Syeda N Iftikhar ◽  
Rimsha Haider ◽  
Raviha Haider ◽  
Muhammad Irfan ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoichiro Okubo ◽  
Takuji Okubo ◽  
Yoshimi Okubo ◽  
Takao Ishiwatari

Solid papillary carcinoma (SPC) is considered a rare malignant breast tumor. Maluf and Koerner first reported this disease entity as a special type of ductal carcinoma in situ with several characteristic histopathological features, including low-grade cellular atypia, intracellular or extracellular mucin deposition, and solid papillary growth pattern, as well as neuroendocrine differentiation. The present paper describes a case of SPC with bcl-2 expression, which is known as a marker for malignancy of neuroendocrine tumors. Interestingly, despite bcl-2 expression being a poor prognostic indicator of neuroendocrine tumors, the patient with this tumor has achieved long-term survival (approximately 6 years) at the time of writing this report. Because previous investigators reported that bcl-2 expression might play a role in the inhibition of the development of breast cancer, we suggest that bcl-2 expression might reflect a good prognosis in patients with SPC, rather than being a poor prognostic indicator, as it is in several types of neuroendocrine tumor. However, to confirm this hypothesis, further investigation is required.


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 491
Author(s):  
Işıl Başara Akın ◽  
Hakan Abdullah Özgül ◽  
Duygu Gürel ◽  
Süleyman Özkan Aksoy ◽  
Pınar Balcı

Encapsulated solid papillary carcinoma (ESPC) is one of the malignant papillary lesions and classified it as ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiologic features of ESPC have been reported in the literature many times. However, to our best knowledge US elastography findings of ESPC have not been reported in the published literature yet. In this case report, we present US elastography findings of ESPC.


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xue Lin ◽  
Yoshiaki Matsumoto ◽  
Tomomi Nakakimura ◽  
Kazuo Ono ◽  
Shigeaki Umeoka ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
pp. 590-597
Author(s):  
Sarah E Bonnet ◽  
Gloria J Carter ◽  
Wendie A Berg

Abstract Encapsulated papillary carcinoma (EPC) is a rare, clinically indolent breast malignancy most common in postmenopausal women. Absence of myoepithelial cells at the periphery is a characteristic feature. Mammographically, EPC typically presents as a mostly circumscribed, noncalcified, dense mass that can have focally indistinct margins when there is associated frank invasive carcinoma. Ultrasound shows a circumscribed solid or complex cystic and solid mass, and occasional hemorrhage in the cystic component may produce a fluid-debris level; the solid components typically show intense washout enhancement on MRI. Color Doppler may demonstrate a prominent vascular pedicle and blood flow within solid papillary fronds. Encapsulated papillary carcinoma can exist in pure form; however, EPC is often associated with conventional ductal carcinoma in-situ and/or invasive ductal carcinoma, no special type. Adjacent in-situ and invasive disease may be only focally present at the periphery of EPC and potentially unsampled at core-needle biopsy. In order to facilitate diagnosis, the mass wall should be included on core-needle biopsy, which will show absence of myoepithelial markers. Staging and prognosis are determined by any associated frankly invasive component, with usually excellent long-term survival and rare distant metastases.


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 205031211881154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ichiro Maeda ◽  
Shinya Tajima ◽  
Yoshihide Kanemaki ◽  
Koichiro Tsugawa ◽  
Masayuki Takagi

Objectives: The aim of this study was to use immunohistochemistry to differentiate solid papillary carcinoma in situ from intraductal papilloma with usual ductal hyperplasia (IPUDH). Three types of high-molecular-weight cytokeratins (CKs) – CK5/6, CK14, and CK34betaE12 – were targeted. Methods: We studied 17 patients with solid papillary carcinoma in situ and 18 patients with IPUDH diagnosed by at least two pathologists. Immunohistochemical analyses used antibodies to CK5/6, CK14, and CK34betaE12 to make the differential diagnosis of solid papillary carcinoma in situ versus IPUDH. Immunohistochemical staining was scored as 0–5 using Allred score. Results: Immunohistochemistry with CK5/6 and CK14 antibodies produced scores of 0–3 in all patients with solid papillary carcinoma in situ and 2–5 in all patients with IPUDH. Immunohistochemical staining with CK34betaE12 antibody produced scores of 1–3 in all patients with solid papillary carcinoma and 3–5 in all patients with IPUDH. In tissues from patients with IPUDH, significantly more cells were stained with CK34betaE12 than CK5/6 ( p < 0.05) or CK14 ( p < 0.05). Conclusion: The immunoreactivity of CK5/6, CK14, and CK34betaE12 antibodies was useful to differentiate solid papillary carcinoma in situ from IPUDH. CK34betaE12 is especially useful for distinguishing solid papillary carcinoma from IPUDH.


2022 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. e2021352
Author(s):  
Toyaja Jadhav ◽  
Shashi Shekhar Prasad ◽  
Bhupesh Guleria ◽  
Manvir Singh Tevatia ◽  
Prerna Guleria

The Breast ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 67-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuangping Guo ◽  
Yingmei Wang ◽  
Joseph Rohr ◽  
Chaoliang Fan ◽  
Qinglong Li ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noritaka Kudo ◽  
Jun Takano ◽  
Shinji Kudoh ◽  
Nobuyuki Arima ◽  
Takaaki Ito

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document