scholarly journals Artificial liver research output and citations from 2004 to 2017: a bibliometric analysis

PeerJ ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. e6178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Li ◽  
Meizhi He ◽  
Ziyuan Zou ◽  
Xiaohui Bian ◽  
Xiaowen Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tissue Engineering ◽  
Liver Failure ◽  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Research Area ◽  
Blood Purification ◽  
Artificial Organs ◽  
Artificial Liver ◽  
Bioartificial Livers ◽  
Number Of Citations

Background Researches on artificial livers greatly contribute to the clinical treatments for liver failure. This study aimed to evaluate the research output of artificial livers and citations from 2004 to 2017 through a bibliometric analysis. Methods A list of included articles on artificial livers were generated after a comprehensive search of the Web of Science Core Collection (from 2004 to 2017) with the following basic information: number of publications, citations, publication year, country of origin, authors and authorship, funding source, journals, institutions, keywords, and research area. Results A total of 968 included articles ranged from 47 citations to 394 citations with a fluctuation. The publications were distributed in 12 countries, led by China (n = 212) and the US (n = 207). There were strong correlations of the number of citations with authors (r2 = 0.133, p < 0.001), and countries (r2 = 0.275, p < 0.001), while no correlations of the number of citations with the years since publication (r2 = 0.016, p = 0.216), and funding (r2 < 0.001, p = 0.770) were identified. Keyword analysis demonstrated that with the specific change of “acute liver failure,” decrease in “bioartificial livers” and “hepatocyte,” and increase in “tissue engineering” were identified. The top 53 cited keyword and keyword plus (including some duplicates counts) were identified, led by bioartificial liver (405 citations) and hepatocyte (248 citations). The top 50 cited keywords bursts were mainly “Blood” (2004–2008), “hepatocyte like cell” (2008–2015), and “tissue engineering” (2014–2017). All keywords could be classified into four categories: bioartificial livers (57.40%), blood purification (25.00%), clinical (14.81%), and other artificial organs (2.78%). Discussion This study shows the process and tendency of artificial liver research with a comprehensive analysis on artificial livers. However, although it seems that the future of artificial livers seems brighter for hepatocyte transplantation, the systems of artificial livers now are inclined on focusing on blood purification, plasma exchange, etc.

scholarly journals A Bibliometric Analysis of the Global Trend of Using Alginate, Gelatine, and Hydroxyapatite for Bone Tissue Regeneration Applications

Polymers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 647
Author(s):  
Mohamed Saiful Firdaus Hussin ◽  
Aludin Mohd Serah ◽  
Khairul Azri Azlan ◽  
Hasan Zuhudi Abdullah ◽  
Maizlinda Izwana Idris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tissue Engineering ◽  
Bone Tissue Engineering ◽  
Bone Tissue ◽  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Research Work ◽  
The United States ◽  
Research Area ◽  
Bone Tissue Regeneration ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Starting Point

Collecting information from previous investigations and expressing it in a scientometrics study can be a priceless guide to getting a complete overview of a specific research area. The aim of this study is to explore the interrelated connection between alginate, gelatine, and hydroxyapatite within the scope of bone tissue and scaffold. A review of traditional literature with data mining procedures using bibliometric analyses was considered to identify the evolution of the selected research area between 2009 and 2019. Bibliometric methods and knowledge visualization technologies were implemented to investigate diverse publications based on the following indicators: year of publication, document type, language, country, institution, author, journal, keyword, and number of citations. An analysis using a bibliometric study found that 7446 papers were located with the keywords “bone tissue” and “scaffold”, and 1767 (alginate), 185 (gelatine), 5658 (hydroxyapatite) papers with those specific sub keywords. The number of publications that relate to “tissue engineering” and bone more than doubled between 2009 (1352) and 2019 (2839). China, the United States and India are the most productive countries, while Sichuan University and the Chinese Academy of Science from China are the most important institutions related to bone tissue scaffold. Materials Science and Engineering C is the most productive journal, followed by the Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. This paper is a starting point, providing the first bibliometric analysis study of bone tissue and scaffold considering alginate, gelatine and hydroxyapatite. A bibliometric analysis would greatly assist in giving a scientific insight to support desired future research work, not only associated with bone tissue engineering applications. It is expected that the analysis of alginate, gelatine and hydroxyapatite in terms of 3D bioprinting, clinical outcomes, scaffold architecture, and the regenerative medicine approach will enhance the research into bone tissue engineering in the near future. Continued studies into these research fields are highly recommended.

scholarly journals Fecal microbiota transplantation research output from 2004 to 2017: a bibliometric analysis

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Li ◽  
Ziyuan Zou ◽  
Yushan Huang ◽  
Xiaohui Bian ◽  
Yanru Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clostridium Difficile ◽  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Research Performance ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Citation Network ◽  
Fecal Microbiota ◽  
The Us ◽  
Number Of Citations

Background: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an emerging therapy against Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Although the therapy has gained prominence, there has been no bibliometric analysis of FMT. Methods: Studies published from 2004 to 2017 were extracted from the Science Citation Index Expanded. Bibliometric analysis were used to evaluate the number or cooperation of publications, countries, citations, references, journals, authors, institutions and keywords. Results: A total of 796 items were included, showing an increasing trend annually. Publications mainly came from 10 countries, led by the US (n = 363). In the top 100 articles ranked by the number of citations (range 47-1158), American Journal of Gastroenterology (2017 IF = 10.231) took the top spot. The co-citation network had 7 co-citation clusters headed by ‘recurrent Clostridium difficile infection’. The top 7 keywords with the strongest citation bursts had three parts, ‘microbiota’, ‘ diarrhea ’, and ‘case series’. All keywords were divided into four domains, ‘disease’, ‘nosogenesis’, ‘trial’, and ‘therapy’. Conclusions: This study shows the research performance of FMT from 2004 to 2017 and helps investigators master the trend of FMT, which is also an ongoing hotspot of research.

scholarly journals Quantifying research output on poverty and non-communicable disease behavioural risk factors in low-income and lower middle-income countries: a bibliometric analysis

BMJ Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. e014715 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luke Nelson Allen ◽  
Nicholas Fox ◽  
Alissa Ambrose
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Impact Factor ◽  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Research Output ◽  
High Income ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Behavioural Risk Factors ◽  
Number Of Citations

ObjectivesLow-income and lower middle-income countries (LLMICs) bear a disproportionate burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs). WHO has repeatedly called for more research on poverty and NCDs in these settings, but the current situation remains unquantified. We aimed to assess research output on poverty and NCD risk factors from these countries in relation to upper middle-income and high-income countries.DesignBibliometric analysis of primary research published between 1 January 1990 and 4 May 2017. We searched 13 databases, combining terms for poverty and NCD behavioural risk factors (tobacco, alcohol, diet and physical activity). Independent dual review was used to screen titles, abstracts and full papers. Two-tailed t-testing and multiple linear regression analyses were used to compare differences in means.Outcomes(1) Proportion of lead authors affiliated with institutions based in high and upper middle-income countries vs LLMICs. (2) Mean number of citations for publications from each region. (3) Mean journal impact factor for studies from each region.ResultsNinety-one (67%) of the 136 included studies were led by scientists affiliated with LLMIC-based institutions. These authors represented 17/83 LLMICs (20%), and their studies garnered 4.8 fewer citations per paper than studies led by high-income and upper middle-income-affiliated authors; however, this finding was non-significant (P=0.67). Papers led by authors based in high-income and upper middle-income countries were published in journals with a mean impact factor 3.1 points higher than those from LLMICs (4.9 vs 1.7) adjusting for year of publication and number of citations (P<0.001).ConclusionsMost poverty and NCD risk factor research is led by authors from a small number of LLMICs. These studies are being published in relatively low-impact journals, and the vast majority of LLMICs are not producing any research in this area that is vital to their social and economic development. The paucity of domestic evidence must be addressed to inform global policy.

scholarly journals A bibliometric analysis of neuromarketing on web of science

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feyza Gürbüz ◽  
◽  
Sabiha Ünal ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Research Area ◽  
Publication Type ◽  
Document Type ◽  
The Status ◽  
Country Analysis ◽  
Number Of Citations ◽  
Implementation Steps ◽  
The Web

The aim of the study within this framework, articles published on Neuromarketing between 2013 and 2018 were examined separately in the title and topic categories on the Web of Science (WOS) site and is aimed to analyse the status of the articles in the last 5 years. Articles with desired properties are parsed and internationally published articles have been reached. Before data is thrown into the CiteSpace V program, the implementation steps you will see on the next pages have been implemented individually. Bibliometric analysis was evaluated as visual, textual and statistical analysis by filling the relevant fields according to the results of the desired analysis. According to the number of citations in the studies, the author's name, country analysis of articles, institutions where authors work, article page numbers, publication type, research area, year of publication of articles, source title, and document type were examined.

scholarly journals A Bibliometric Analysis of Race-Related Research in LIS

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Mongeon ◽  
Alison Brown ◽  
Ratna Dhaliwal ◽  
Jessalyn Hill ◽  
Amber Matthews
Keyword(s):  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Research Area ◽  
Related Research ◽  
Work In Progress ◽  
To Receive

The purpose of this work in progress is to quantify the amount of attention given to questions of racial inequity experienced by BIPOC in LIS research. We find that despite a recent surge in BIPOC-related research output, the publications are low in numbers and tend to receive fewer citations than other work in the same research area. BIPOC-related research is present but unevenly distributed across several areas of the field. These trends may help create and sustain momentum towards addressing the persistent lack of diversity and equity in LIS.

scholarly journals Bibliometric analysis of the most cited articles in BRICS research

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-106
Author(s):  
Matheus Machado Rech ◽  
Germano Luciano Almeida
Keyword(s):  
Impact Factor ◽  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Research Area ◽  
Article Title ◽  
Specific Research ◽  
Scopus Database ◽  
Number Of Citations

Bibliometric analysis identifies the most impactful and prolific journals, authors, countries, and institutions by assessing the most cited articles in a specific research area. The aim of this study is to analyze and to provide a scope of modern scientific products related to BRICS. The 100 most cited articles related to the BRICS research were retrieved from the study “(BRICS)” in the Scopus database. The variables collected and included in this analysis are: number of citations, article title, first author’s name, year and journal of publication and its impact factor, theme and country mentioned in the database at the time of publication, and category of the paper (original article or review).

scholarly journals YEAST IN BIOPHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES: VISUALISATION OF RESEARCH LANDSCAPE AND A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 133-144
Author(s):  
JIE YEE WAN ◽  
CHIA WEI PHAN ◽  
NOORHIDAWATI ABDULLAH ◽  
YASAASWINI APPARAO ◽  
IAN MACREADIE
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Hot Spots ◽  
Research Output ◽  
The United States ◽  
Research Area ◽  
Steady Increase ◽  
Production Study ◽  
Scopus Database ◽  
Japan And China

The current study aims to analyse the trend in yeast research within the domain of biopharmaceutical sciences. Bibliographic information of the 1,000 most cited publications on yeast research in biopharmaceutical science was retrieved from the Scopus database. The data was then analysed by using bibliometric approaches. The data indicated a steady increase in publication numbers. The United States, Japan and China were among the highest research output countries. A total of 25 top core journals were identified. The keywords with the highest frequency included production, study and activity. To conclude, the current bibliometric analysis provides information that may be useful in locating research hot spots and gaps in the research area of yeast in biopharmaceutical science.

scholarly journals A worldwide bibliometric analysis of published literature on workplace violence in healthcare personnel

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. e0242781
Author(s):  
Jesús Cebrino ◽  
Silvia Portero de la Cruz
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Workplace Violence ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Public Health Problem ◽  
Healthcare Personnel ◽  
Nursing Management ◽  
Number Of Publications ◽  
The University ◽  
Number Of Citations

Background Workplace violence in healthcare professionals has become a worldwide public health problem and has been the focus of numerous publications; however, currently, no macroscopic overviews of this research based on bibliometric analysis have been carried out. Therefore, the main aim of this study was to analyse the research trends focusing on workplace violence in healthcare personnel over the last 27 years. Materials and methods A bibliometric study was conducted from 1992 to 2019 in the field of workplace violence in healthcare personnel using the Scopus database. The author co-citation analysis was carried out using VOSviewer software. A worldwide map was created with Mapchart and word cloud image was created using Wordart. Descriptive and inferential statistics were applied. Findings 1791 records were analysed, 1376 of which (76.83%) were articles, with “Medicine” the most frequent subject category (58.91%). English was the predominant language (93.41%). From 2004 onwards, there was an exponential rise in the number of publications (R2 coefficient = 0.89; p < 0.0001) and the number of annual citations gradually increased from 1995 (R2 coefficient = 0.73; p < 0.0001). The University of Cincinnati (United States) was the institution (and country) with the highest number of publications (n = 30; n = 549), with D. M. Gates leading the ranking of the most productive authors (n = 21). Journal of Nursing Management was the most active journal publishing on the topic (n = 34) and the commonest keyword was “human/s” (16.43%). Conclusion From 1992 to 2019, worldwide research into the published literature on workplace violence in healthcare personnel has grown steadily year by year, both in the number of documents and the number of citations. United States and their institutions and researchers dominates this research output.

scholarly journals Fecal microbiota transplantation research output from 2004 to 2017: a bibliometric analysis

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Li ◽  
Ziyuan Zou ◽  
Yushan Huang ◽  
Xiaohui Bian ◽  
Yanru Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clostridium Difficile ◽  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Research Performance ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Citation Network ◽  
Fecal Microbiota ◽  
The Us ◽  
Number Of Citations

Background: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an emerging therapy against Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Although the therapy has gained prominence, there has been no bibliometric analysis of FMT. Methods: Studies published from 2004 to 2017 were extracted from the Science Citation Index Expanded. Bibliometric analysis were used to evaluate the number or cooperation of publications, countries, citations, references, journals, authors, institutions and keywords. Results: A total of 796 items were included, showing an increasing trend annually. Publications mainly came from 10 countries, led by the US (n = 363). In the top 100 articles ranked by the number of citations (range 47-1158), American Journal of Gastroenterology (2017 IF = 10.231) took the top spot. The co-citation network had 7 co-citation clusters headed by ‘recurrent Clostridium difficile infection’. The top 7 keywords with the strongest citation bursts had three parts, ‘microbiota’, ‘ diarrhea ’, and ‘case series’. All keywords were divided into four domains, ‘disease’, ‘nosogenesis’, ‘trial’, and ‘therapy’. Conclusions: This study shows the research performance of FMT from 2004 to 2017 and helps investigators master the trend of FMT, which is also an ongoing hotspot of research.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document