scholarly journals Poeciliid male mate preference is influenced by female size but not by fecundity

PeerJ ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. e140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis R. Arriaga ◽  
Ingo Schlupp
Behaviour ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 146 (6) ◽  
pp. 727-740 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scarlett Tudor ◽  
Molly Morris

AbstractMale and female mate preferences have the potential to influence one another, and such interactions could help explain variation in female mate preferences. In Xiphophorus malinche, larger females prefer asymmetrical males while smaller females prefer symmetrical males. We used a two-part preference test to determine if there were differences in mate preferences between symmetrical and asymmetrical males for female size that could influence female mate preference. We found no significant difference between symmetrical and asymmetrical male's preferences. A preference for large female size was detected during the time males directly interacted with females and in standard dichotomous choice tests that followed, as long as the males had been isolated less than 30 days. We did detect variation in male preference for female size depending on male size and the amount of time a male was isolated. These results suggest that variation in male mate preference is not likely to have produced the difference in female preference for symmetry between large and small females, but should be considered where females vary in their preference for male size. In addition, our results suggest that males may shift their preferences from large to small females depending on time since last mating opportunity.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sam Ronan Finnegan ◽  
Leslie Nitsche ◽  
Matteo Mondani ◽  
M Florencia Camus ◽  
Kevin Fowler ◽  
...  

AbstractMale mate preferences have been demonstrated across a range of species, including the Malaysian stalk-eyed fly, Teleopsis dalmanni. This species is subject to sex-ratio (SR), an X-linked male meiotic driver, which causes the dysfunction of Y-sperm and the production of all-female broods. While there has been work considering female avoidance of meiotic drive males, the mating decisions of drive-bearing males have not been considered previously. Drive males may be less able to bear the cost of choice as SR is associated with a low-frequency inversion that causes reduced organismal fitness. Drive males may also experience weaker selection for preference maintenance if they are avoided by females. Using binary choice trials, across two experiments, we confirmed male preference for large (fecund) females but found no evidence that the strength of male preference differs between drive and standard males. We showed that large eyespan males displayed strong preference for large females, whereas small eyespan males showed no preference. Taken together, these results suggest that, even though meiotic drive is associated with lower genetic quality, it does not directly interfere with male mate preference among available females. However, as drive males tend to have smaller eyespan (albeit only ~5% on average), this will to a minor extent weaken their strength of preference.


Behaviour ◽  
1976 ◽  
Vol 56 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 116-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne P. Weber ◽  
Peter G. Weber

AbstractThis study investigates the role of female color, size, and dominance, and the influence of early color experience in mate selection by male Convict cichlids, Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum. Dark wild-type male fish were reared by dark parents in dark schools (dark homogenous group), and by mixed dark and white parents in mixed schools (dark mixed group), until sexual maturity. Correspondingly a white homogenous group and a white mixed group were also established. Each male was then allowed to choose a mate among two dark (mixed group) and two white (mixed group) females. Males tended to spawn more often with dark females and always spawned with dominant females. Female size is positively correlated with female dominance and this may be either as a cause or as an effect of female dominance. Early color experience appears to be unimportant in male mate selection.


Ethology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 123 (11) ◽  
pp. 793-799 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan M. Bertram ◽  
Sarah J. Harrison ◽  
Genevieve L. Ferguson ◽  
Ian R. Thomson ◽  
Michelle J. Loranger ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 79 (1) ◽  
pp. 194-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Alberici da Barbiano ◽  
A. S. Aspbury ◽  
C. C. Nice ◽  
C. R. Gabor

Ethology ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 121 (11) ◽  
pp. 1122-1130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvine Durand ◽  
Fanny Beauché ◽  
Freddie-Jeanne Richard ◽  
Sophie Beltran-Bech

2016 ◽  
Vol 70 (11) ◽  
pp. 1805-1812 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent A. Formica ◽  
Hannah Donald-Cannon ◽  
Ian E. Perkins-Taylor
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document