scholarly journals An evaluation of factors affecting pain during transrectal ultrasonographic prostate biopsy: a real-life scenario in a retrospective cohort study

PeerJ ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. e12144
Author(s):  
Oğuz Özden Cebeci ◽  
Alp Ozkan
Keyword(s):  
Local Anesthesia ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Volume Number ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Independent Variables ◽  
Rectal Examination ◽  
T Stage ◽  
Anorectal Pain ◽  
Probe Insertion

Background Periprostatic infiltration anesthesia (PPIA) and intrarectal topical anesthesia (IRTA) are recommended methods to control pain in transrectal ultrasonographic prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx). This study evaluates the factors affecting pain during TRUS-Bx, considering the pathologies involved in anorectal pain etiology and comparing the effectiveness of local anesthesia techniques in providing patient comfort. Material and Methods We retrospectively evaluated 477 consecutive patients with TRUS-Bx for elevated Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), abnormal rectal examination findings, or both. Patients were grouped as local anesthesia methods for pain control during TRUS-Bx. Both groups were compared in terms of age, body mass index, clinical T stage, PSA, prostate volume, number of biopsy cores, type of anesthesia, previous biopsy history, and presence of prostate cancer. We used a visual analog pain scale (VAS) to evaluate the patient’s pain status; pre-procedure (VAS-0), during probe insertion (VAS-I), administration of anesthetic (VAS-A), and simultaneous with the biopsy procedure itself (VAS-Bx). For PPIA and IRTA, 4 ml lidocaine 20 mg/ml injection and 5 g 5% prilocaine-5% lidocaine cream was used, respectively. Results The PPIA was used 74.2% (n = 354) and IRTA was used for 25.8% (n = 123) patients. VAS-0, VAS-I, and VAS-A scores are similar between groups. VAS-Bx was significantly higher in the IRTA than in the PPIA (3.37 ± 0.18 vs. 2.36 ± 0.12 p > 0.001). Clinical T stage (OR: 0.59), number of biopsy cores (OR: 1.80), and type of anesthesia application (OR: 2.65) were independent variables on TRUS-Bx for pain. Conclusion Three factors play roles as independent variables associated with the pain in TRUS-Bx; abnormal rectal examination findings, collection of more than twelve core samples during the biopsy, and the type of anesthesia used. Compared with PPIA, IRTA does not improve pain related to probe insertion, and using IRTA results in higher pain scores for biopsy-related pain. Thus, we recommend a PPIA to lower biopsy-related pain.

scholarly journals Integrated predictive model for prostatic cancer using clinical, laboratory and ultrasound data

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 430-437
Author(s):  
GUSTAVO DAVID LUDWIG ◽  
HENRIQUE PERES ROCHA ◽  
LÚCIO JOSÉ BOTELHO ◽  
MAIARA BRUSCO FREITAS
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Predictive Model ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Clinical Laboratory ◽  
Prostate Volume ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
Roc Curves ◽  
Rectal Examination ◽  
Psa Density

ABSTRACT Objective: to develop a predictive model to estimate the probability of prostate cancer prior to biopsy. Methods: from September 2009 to January 2014, 445 men underwent prostate biopsy in a radiology service. We excluded from the study patients with diseases that could compromise the data analysis, who had undergone prostatic resection or used 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors. Thus, we selected 412 patients. Variables included in the model were age, prostate specific antigen (PSA), digital rectal examination, prostate volume and abnormal sonographic findings. We constructed Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves and calculated the areas under the curve, as well as the model's Positive Predictive Value (PPV) . Results: of the 412 men, 155 (37.62%) had prostate cancer (PC). The mean age was 63.8 years and the median PSA was 7.22ng/ml. In addition, 21.6% and 20.6% of patients had abnormalities on digital rectal examination and image suggestive of cancer by ultrasound, respectively. The median prostate volume and PSA density were 45.15cm3 and 0.15ng/ml/cm3, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that only five studied risk factors are predictors of PC in the study (p<0.05). The PSA density was excluded from the model (p=0.314). The area under the ROC curve for PC prediction was 0.86. The PPV was 48.08% for 95%sensitivity and 52.37% for 90% sensitivity. Conclusion: the results indicate that clinical, laboratory and ultrasound data, besides easily obtained, can better stratify the risk of patients undergoing prostate biopsy.

scholarly journals Histology results of systematic prostate biopsies by in-bore magnetic resonance imaging vs. transrectal ultrasound

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alon Lazarovich ◽  
Gil Raviv ◽  
Yael Laitman ◽  
Orith Portnoy ◽  
Orit Raz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Transrectal Ultrasound ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Rectal Examination ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Clinically Significant

Introduction: We aimed to compare systematic biopsies (SBs) of in-bore magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy (MRGpB) with those performed under transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guidance in the clinical setting. Methods: Data on all 161 consecutive patients undergoing prostate biopsy in our institution between November 2017 and July 2019 were retrospectively collected. The patients were referred to biopsy due to elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and/or abnormal digital rectal examination and/or at least one Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) lesion score of ≥3 on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). We included patients with PSA levels ≤20 ng/ml and those with 8–12 core biopsies. Histology results of SBs performed by in-bore MRGpB were compared to TRUS SBs. Chi-squared, Fischer’s exact, and multivariate Pearson regression tests were used for statistical analysis (SPSS, IBM Corporation). Results: In total, 128 patients were eligible for analysis. Their median age was 68 years (interquartile range [IQR] 61.5–72), mean prostate size 55±29 cc, and mean PSA and PSA density levels 7.6±3.5 ng/ml and 0.18±0.13 ng/ml/cc, respectively. Thirty-five patients (27.3%) had suspicious digital rectal examination findings. Both biopsy groups were similar for these parameters. Thirty-eight (62.3%) MRGpB patients had a previous biopsy vs. 5 (7.1%) TRUS-SB patients (p<0.0001). The number of patients diagnosed with clinically significant and non-significant disease was similar for both groups. High-risk disease was more prevalent in the TRUS-SB group (22.4% vs. 4.9%, p<0.01). Conclusions: Our data suggest that in-bore MRGpB is no better than TRUS for guiding SBs for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.

Should Men with Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen ≤4 ng/ml and Normal Digital Rectal Examination Undergo a Prostate Biopsy?

Oncology ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 70 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pietro Pepe ◽  
Paolo Panella ◽  
Letterio D’Arrigo ◽  
Francesco Savoca ◽  
Michele Pennisi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
Rectal Examination ◽  
Serum Prostate Specific Antigen

Comparative study on Periprostatic local anesthesia with Intraprostatic local anesthesia for ultrasonoguided transrectal prostatic biopsy

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 33-39
Author(s):  
AM Anamur Rashid Choudhury ◽  
Md waliul Islam ◽  
Sharif Shahjamal ◽  
Kazi Rafiqul Abedin ◽  
Abu Bakar Siddique ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Local Anesthesia ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Transrectal Ultrasound ◽  
Prostatic Biopsy ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Group I ◽  
Transrectal Prostate Biopsy ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group Ii

Objectives: To compare pain, systemic lidocaine toxicity and complications between periprostatic with intraprostatic local anaesthesia for transrectal prostate biopsy. Methods: This study was carried out in the Department of Urology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka Medical College (DMCH) and Comfort Nursing Home, Dhaka during the period of January 2009 to October 2009, For this purpose, a total number of 60 consecutive patients having increased prostate specific antigen (PSA >4.0ng/ml), abnormal DRE/transrectal ultrasound were admitted in the above mentioned hospitals were enrolled in this study for surgical management. Results: The age ranged from 50 to 90 years and the maximum number was found in the age group of 61-70 years in both groups. The mean(±SD) age was 68.5±7.5 years and 70.3±8.2 years in group I and group II respectively. The mean(±SD) PSA was 17.0±12.8ng/ ml with their PSA ranged from 5.9- 62.8ng/ml in group I and in group II was 17.2±17.3ng/ml with their PSA ranged from 4.6 – 55.1ng/ml, which was not significant (p>0.05) between two groups. Normal digital rectal was found 14(46.7%) and 16(53.3%) in group I and group II respectively. Carcinoma was found 13(43.3%) and 14(46.7%) in group I and group II respectively and rest of them were benign in group I and group II respectively. The mean(±SD) pain degree during biopsy was 2.6±1.1 and 2.0±1.2 in group I and group II respectively according to allocated pain score. Pain degree after 30 minutes of biopsy, most of the patients had no pain in both groups. Pain during anesthesia it was found that 4(13.3%) and 13(43.3%) of the patients had no pain in group I and group II respectively. The mean(±SD) pain degree during anesthesia was 2.7±1.2 and 2.1±1.2 in group I and group II respectively. Conclusion: It is a simple and safe method that is less painful and it should be considered in all patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. The decreased discomfort of this procedure may enable more core biopsies to be taken in patients at high risk for prostate cancer or in those with an enlarged prostate Bangladesh Journal of Urology, Vol. 15, No. 2, July 2012 p.33-39

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document