scholarly journals Visual duration bisection in profoundly deaf individuals

PeerJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. e10133
Author(s):  
Feng Zhang ◽  
Kaige Jin ◽  
Sainan Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Visual Field ◽  
Left Visual Field ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Visual Fields ◽  
Duration Discrimination ◽  
Repeated Measure ◽  
Discrimination Accuracy ◽  
Visual Channel ◽  
Bisection Task

Background Previous research has been designed to study the effect of hearing loss on supra-second duration estimation in the visual channel and position effect of visual abilities among deaf populations. The current study aimed to investigate the sub-second duration perception of different visual fields in profoundly deaf individuals. Methods A total of 16 profoundly deaf undergraduates and 16 hearing undergraduates completed a visual duration bisection task in which participants made judgments about whether a series of probe durations that were linearly spaced from 200 ms to 800 ms at 100 ms intervals were more similar to a standard short duration (200 ms) or a standard long duration (800 ms). The probe stimuli were presented in the center, left, or right of the screen. A repeated measure analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a between-participants factor of group and a within-participants factor of position, and a one-sample t-test were conducted. Results The Weber ratio (WR) values of deaf participants were significantly higher than those of hearing participants, regardless of the presented positions of the visual stimulus. The bisection point (BP) value of deaf participants was significantly lower than 500 ms (average mean of 200/800 ms) and the BP value of hearing participants did not significantly differ from 500 ms, although the overall difference of BP values between the deaf group and hearing group did not reach significance. For deaf participants, the BP value in the center condition was significantly lower than 500 ms; however, the difference between the BP value in the left condition and 500 ms did not reach significance, indicating that their duration discrimination accuracy in the left visual field was better than that in the center visual field. Conclusions Hearing loss impaired visual sub-second duration perception, and deaf individuals showed a left visual field advantage of duration discrimination accuracy during the visual duration bisection task.

Visual Field Sensitivity on a Two-Choice Discrimination Task

1981 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Salmon ◽  
Albert Rodwan
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Signal Detection ◽  
Left Visual Field ◽  
Discrimination Task ◽  
Visual Fields ◽  
Detection Analysis ◽  
Field Sensitivity ◽  
Signal Detection Analysis ◽  
The Right ◽  
Stimulation Of

A signal-detection analysis was used to evaluate visual-field sensitivity on a two-choice (same/different) discrimination task. Pairs of unfamiliar geometrical forms were presented tachistoscopically to the right or left visual fields of 12 subjects. Of 12 subjects 11 obtained left visual-field values which exceeded those of the right. The data suggested that the superiority of stimulation of the left visual field resulted from greater sensitivity to “same” figure pairs.

Effect of Learning on Hemispheric Dominance and Free Recall in a Single Subject

1972 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 227-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lester C. Shine ◽  
Joseph Wiant ◽  
Frank Da Polito
Keyword(s):  
Free Recall ◽  
Visual Field ◽  
Analysis Of Variance ◽  
Field Condition ◽  
Left Visual Field ◽  
Visual Fields ◽  
Hemispheric Dominance ◽  
Right Visual Field ◽  
Single Subject ◽  
The Right

This experiment was designed to investigate the effect of learning on the free recall of letters presented tachistoscopically either to the left visual field, the right visual field, or identically and simultaneously to both visual fields. A modified Shine-Bower analysis of variance was used to analyze S's performance. The results indicate that initially, in accord with previous research, the right visual field is superior to the left visual field in performance, but that this superiority tends to reduce across trials and practically disappears in the later trials. Also, the right visual field condition is not appreciably better in performance than the condition with both visual fields.

scholarly journals Single-Case Neuropsychological Assessment of a Patient with a Posterior Parietal Lesion Using Behavioral Testing and Resting-State fMRI

2021 ◽  
Vol 05 (03) ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Elisa Martín-Arévalo ◽  
◽  
Carole Guedj ◽  
François Cotton ◽  
Gilles Rode ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Functional Connectivity ◽  
Resting State ◽  
Left Visual Field ◽  
Single Case ◽  
Visual Fields ◽  
Resting State Fmri ◽  
Occipital Area ◽  
Posterior Parietal ◽  
The Right

This study integrated functional connectivity measures using resting-state fMRI and behavioral data from a single-case observation of patient (PER) one year after right-hemispheric hemorrhage in the intraparietal sulcus and superior parietal lobule (IPS/SPL). PER showed no sign of clinical neglect. Her behavioral performance in the visuo-manual pointing task and in the letter discrimination task under conditions of endogenous and exogenous attentional cueing was compared between the left (affected) and right (unaffected/control) peripheral visual fields. The resting-state fMRI demonstrated an imbalance between the right and left hemispheric frontoparietal functional connectivity within the dorsal attentional and motor networks. Although the frontal and occipital cortices were not structurally damaged, specific fronto-occipital functional connectivity was imbalanced, which was strongly associated with the behavioral changes. First, the activity in the right frontal eye field showed weaker correlations with the activity in the right inferior occipital area compared to the correlation with the activity in the left inferior occipital area. This imbalanced fronto-occipital functional connectivity was accompanied by a specific impairment in endogenous covert attention in the left visual field. Second, the activity within M1 in both hemispheres showed weaker correlations with the activity of the right cuneus compared to the correlation with the activity in the left cuneus. The imbalanced fronto-occipital functional connectivity was associated with the impairment of the reaching movement of the left and right hands towards the left visual field (optic ataxia). Altogether, our results showed that a lesion to the posterior parietal cortex affects the relationship between distal regions underlying the sensorimotor and attentional abilities

Tachistoscopic tests of colour naming and matching in schizophrenia: evidence for posterior callosum dysfunction?

1987 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 621-630 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. S. David
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Corpus Callosum ◽  
Left Visual Field ◽  
Visual Fields ◽  
Cerebral Atrophy ◽  
Neuroleptic Drugs ◽  
Colour Perception ◽  
Impaired Performance ◽  
First Rank Symptoms

SynopsisNeuropsychological studies have shown that the integrity of the posterior corpus callosum is necessary for accurate colour naming in the left visual field (LVF) and colour matching across hemifields. Using this model, 22 schizophrenics, 14 depressive and 16 healthy matched controls were given a battery of tachistoscopic tests of colour perception. The schizophrenics made significantly more errors, in naming colours in the LVF compared to depressives, and in matching colours across fields compared to depressives and normals. There were no differences between groups for right visual (RVF) colour naming or matching within right and left visual fields. These findings support the hypothesis that trans-callosal transmission may be impaired in schizophrenia and are unlikely to be due to a specific disorder of colour perception, neuroleptic drugs or generally impaired performance. Those schizophrenics whose LVF naming errors exceeded RVF errors were more likely to have first rank symptoms and showed less cerebral atrophy but did not differ on other variables. The techniques described may be useful for further research into interhemispheric function in schizophrenia.

Recognition of Alphabetical Arrays Presented in the Right and Left Visual Fields

1969 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Fudin
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Left Visual Field ◽  
Visual Fields ◽  
Stimulus Presentation ◽  
Right Visual Field ◽  
Cell Assembly ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Experimental Findings ◽  
The Right ◽  
Central Fixation

Six-letter nonsense arrays were tachistoscopically presented successively in the right visual field (RVF) and left visual field (LVF) at four different displacements from a central fixation point (FP) to 20 Ss. Recognition scores were significantly greater for material exposed in the RVF at each of the first three displacements and for the average of all displacements. In each case the higher recognition score for stimuli in the RVF was limited to letters located in the left-array half (letters 1, 2 and 3). An investigation into the dynamics of scanning indicated that these three letters are more advantageously situated when presented in the RVF. This methodological inconsistency brings into question the use of the results obtained from the successive mode of stimulus presentation as evidence for Hebb's notion of a cell assembly. Several ideas concerning the dynamics of scanning which emerged from the experimental findings were discussed.

Perception of Geometrical Arrays Tachistoscopically Exposed in Right and Left Visual Fields

1975 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 831-834 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Fudin ◽  
Darryl B. Feldman
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Left Visual Field ◽  
Visual Fields ◽  
Physiological Mechanism ◽  
Right Visual Field ◽  
Extensive Experience ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The One ◽  
The Right ◽  
Left Movement

Geometrical stimuli (48 6-item arrays of familiar forms, e.g., circle), tachistoscopically presented in the right or left visual field, were more accurately perceived in the right than left visual field by 15 college students. Targets about half the length of the displays exposed here were perceived with equal facility in both visual fields (Bryden, 1960). Results suggest that length of array might affect the difference in perceptual accuracy of forms shown in the right and left visual fields. Figures in the right visual field were predominantly processed from left to right, and forms in the left visual field from right to left. Since more symbols were identified in the right than left visual field, the left to right encoding sequence may be more efficient than a right to left movement. Limited experience of most Ss in reading symbols from left to right is probably only one factor. Extensive experience reading alphabetical material from left to right might have developed the physiological mechanism underpinning this sequence more than the one serving the opposite movement.

Differential Recognition of Tachistoscopically Presented English and Hebrew Words in Right and Left Visual Fields

1965 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 431-437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melvin I. Barton ◽  
Harold Goodglass ◽  
Amnon Shai
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Cerebral Hemisphere ◽  
Left Visual Field ◽  
Visual Fields ◽  
Cerebral Dominance ◽  
Consistent Finding ◽  
Differential Recognition ◽  
The Right ◽  
Language Areas

In this study, the role of lateral cerebral dominance in the consistent finding of lower tachistoscopic thresholds in the right than in the left visual field for alphabetic material was tested for readers of Hebrew and English. Twenty Israeli Ss were presented with Hebrew and English three-letter words, printed vertically, through a monocular tachistoscope, displaced to left or right of fixation by 2°21′. Ten American Ss were also tested for three-letter English words, under similar conditions. Significantly lower thresholds in the right field were found for both groups and for both languages, despite the fact that Hebrew, unlike English, is read from right to left. These findings tend to support the hypothesis that alphabetic stimuli arriving in the major cerebral hemisphere are more readily recognized than similar stimuli arriving in the hemisphere contralateral to the language areas.

Hemispheric Asymmetry in Reaction Time to Color Stimuli

1977 ◽  
Vol 45 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1151-1155 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Pirot ◽  
T. W. Pulton ◽  
L. W. Sutker
Keyword(s):  
Reaction Time ◽  
Visual Field ◽  
Left Visual Field ◽  
Hemispheric Asymmetry ◽  
Visual Fields ◽  
Left Hand ◽  
Simple Detection ◽  
Color Field ◽  
The Right ◽  
Male Subjects

The simple detection of colored stimuli in the right, center, and left visual fields was examined. 10 male subjects were used in a reaction time paradigm with color (red, green, or blue), field, and hand as independent variables. A significantly faster RT to stimuli presented in the left visual field was observed, and further the left visual field-left hand combination was the fastest of all the combinations of visual-field × hand. A significant interaction of color × field suggested that red may be processed on a higher order level even in a simple detection task.

Asymmetries in Perception of Tachistoscopically Presented Horizontal and Vertical Random-Letter Strings

1983 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 531-538 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. D. G. Webb ◽  
L. Fisher-Ingram ◽  
P. Hope
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Left Visual Field ◽  
Visual Fields ◽  
Upper Visual Field ◽  
Random Letter ◽  
The Right

Two studies examined perception of briefly presented (100-msec.) strings of letters. In Study One, 20 subjects were presented horizontal 5-letter strings in the left, central, and right visual fields. These were compared with 5-letter vertical strings presented centrally in the lower, central, and upper visual fields. Similar within-string patterns were found for all presentations. Between strings there was a typical right over left visual-field advantage in accuracy of report for horizontal strings. There was no equivalent lower over upper visual-field advantage for vertical strings. In Study Two, 24 subject, were presented vertical strings in the right and left visual fields, vertical strings in the upper and lower visual fields, and horizontal strings in the right and left visual fields. A post-stimulus cueing technique for single letters was used. Between-strings, the same right over left visual-field advantage for horizontal strings was noted but not for vertical strings. Between strings no advantage for lower over upper visual fields was found. An interaction for within-string patterns and visual field was found for vertical strings presented in the upper and lower visual fields. These results are explained in terms of an interaction between scanning and masking effects depending upon orientation and visual field.

Visual field processing in paranoid and non-paranoid schizophrenics

1993 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 301-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Aharonovich ◽  
N Karny ◽  
I Nachson
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Left Hemisphere ◽  
Left Visual Field ◽  
Right Hemisphere ◽  
Paranoid Schizophrenia ◽  
Visual Fields ◽  
Auditory Modality ◽  
Right Hemisphere Dysfunction ◽  
The Right ◽  
Normal Controls

SummaryThe hypothesis that paranoid and non-paranoid schizophrenics are differentially associated with unilateral hemisphere dysfunction was tested on 12 paranoid and 12 non-paranoid schizophrenics, as well as on 24 affective patients and 24 normal controls. The subjects were presented for 150 ms with series of digit-pairs and open rings to the left or right visual fields. Overall recognition of digits and localization of gaps in the rings were better for the right than for the left visual field. However, performance of the paranoid and non-paranoid schizophrenics was relatively poorer in response to the right and left visual field stimuli, respectively. Since these data do not correspond to the findings obtained in the auditory modality, they were interpreted as indicating modality-specific associations of paranoid schizophrenia with left hemisphere dysfunction, and of non-paranoid schizophrenia with right hemisphere dysfunction.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document