scholarly journals Walking exercise combined with neuromuscular electrical stimulation of antagonist resistance improved muscle strength and physical function for elderly people: A pilot study

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryuki Hashida ◽  
Hiroo Matsuse ◽  
Yoshio Takano ◽  
Masayuki Omoto ◽  
Takeshi Nago ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Muscle Strength ◽  
Physical Function ◽  
Elderly People ◽  
Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Walking Exercise ◽  
Stimulation Of

scholarly journals Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for Intensive Care Unit–Acquired Weakness: Protocol and Methodological Implications for a Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Phase II Trial

2012 ◽  
Vol 92 (12) ◽  
pp. 1564-1579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle E. Kho ◽  
Alexander D. Truong ◽  
Roy G. Brower ◽  
Jeffrey B. Palmer ◽  
Eddy Fan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Critical Illness ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Muscle Strength ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Bed Rest

BackgroundAs the population ages and critical care advances, a growing number of survivors of critical illness will be at risk for intensive care unit (ICU)–acquired weakness. Bed rest, which is common in the ICU, causes adverse effects, including muscle weakness. Consequently, patients need ICU-based interventions focused on the muscular system. Although emerging evidence supports the benefits of early rehabilitation during mechanical ventilation, additional therapies may be beneficial. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES), which can provide some muscular activity even very early during critical illness, is a promising modality for patients in the ICU.ObjectiveThe objectives of this article are to discuss the implications of bed rest for patients with critical illness, summarize recent studies of early rehabilitation and NMES in the ICU, and describe a protocol for a randomized, phase II pilot study of NMES in patients receiving mechanical ventilation.DesignThe study was a randomized, sham-controlled, concealed, phase II pilot study with caregivers and outcome assessors blinded to the treatment allocation.SettingThe study setting will be a medical ICU.ParticipantsThe study participants will be patients who are receiving mechanical ventilation for 1 day or more, who are expected to stay in the ICU for an additional 2 days or more, and who meet no exclusion criteria.InterventionThe intervention will be NMES (versus a sham [control] intervention) applied to the quadriceps, tibialis anterior, and gastrocnemius muscles for 60 minutes per day.MeasurementsLower-extremity muscle strength at hospital discharge will be the primary outcome measure.LimitationsMuscle strength is a surrogate measure, not a patient-centered outcome. The assessments will not include laboratory, genetic, or histological measures aimed at a mechanistic understanding of NMES. The optimal duration or dose of NMES is unclear.ConclusionsIf NMES is beneficial, the results of the study will help advance research aimed at reducing the burden of muscular weakness and physical disability in survivors of critical illness.

scholarly journals Effects of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation of the Quadriceps and Diaphragm in Critically Ill Patients: A Pilot Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcela Aparecida Leite ◽  
Erica Fernanda Osaku ◽  
Jaqueline Albert ◽  
Claudia Rejane Lima de Macedo Costa ◽  
Alessandra Madalena Garcia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Muscle Strength ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Functional Independence ◽  
Peripheral Muscle ◽  
Icu Discharge ◽  
Length Of Hospitalization ◽  
Stimulation Of

Background. Deep and respiratory muscle disorders are commonly observed in critically ill patients. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is an alternative to mobilize and to exercise that does not require active patient participation and can be used on bedridden patients. Objective. Evaluate the effectiveness of the NMES therapy in quadriceps versus diaphragm subjects in mechanical ventilation (MV). Methods. Sixty-seven subjects in MV were included, divided into 3 groups: (a) control group (CG, n=26), (b) stimulation of quadriceps (quadriceps group–QG, n=24), and (c) stimulation of diaphragm (diaphragm group–DG, n=17). The QG and DG patients received consecutive daily electrical stimulation sessions at specific points from the first day of randomization until ICU discharge. Respiratory and peripheral muscle strength, MV time, length of hospitalization, and functional independence score (the Functional Status Score-ICU) were recorded. Results. There were studied n=24 (QG), n=17 (DG), and n=26 (CG) patients. Peripheral muscle strength improved significantly in the QG (p=0.030). Functional independence at ICU discharge was significantly better in QG (p=0.013), and the QG presented a better Barthel Index compared to DG and CG (p=0.0049) and also presented better FSS compared to CG (p=0.001). Conclusions. Electrical stimulation of quadriceps had best outcomes for peripheral muscle strength compared with controls or electrical stimulation of diaphragm among mechanically ventilated critically ill subjects and promoted functional independence and decreased length of hospitalization.

scholarly journals Comparison of intradialytic neuromuscular electrical stimulation and oral nutritional supplements in hemodialysis patients: study protocol for a multicenter, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial in Korea

Trials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mi-yeon Yu ◽  
Jae Hyeon Park ◽  
Yong Chul Kim ◽  
Jae Yoon Park ◽  
Ran-hui Cha
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Muscle Strength ◽  
Physical Function ◽  
Muscle Mass ◽  
Nutritional Support ◽  
Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Protein Supplementation ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Parallel Group ◽  
Oral Nutritional Supplements

Abstract Background The prevalence of sarcopenia increases as renal function decreases, and a considerable number of hemodialysis (HD) patients have sarcopenia. Exercise and nutritional support are established interventions to prevent and treat sarcopenia. Recently, many studies evaluating intradialytic neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) showed improvement of muscular strength and mass, functional capacity, and quality of life (QOL). However, there has been no research about the effect of simultaneous nutritional support and NMES in HD patients. Methods This is a 12-week, randomized controlled, parallel-group, multicenter trial of intradialytic NMES and protein supplementation for HD patients. Seventy-two patients receiving HD will be randomly assigned in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to control, intradialytic NMES only, protein supplementation only, and intradialytic NMES combined with protein supplementation groups. NMES will be delivered to a total of four areas of the bilateral vastus medialis and vastus lateralis using a 4-channel NMES instrument. A total of 25 g of protein supplements will be provided at the beginning of every dialysis session or after the NMES. The primary endpoint is the difference of hand grip and leg muscle strength at 12 weeks among 4 treatment groups. Secondary endpoints include muscle mass, physical performances, and questionnaires about QOL and physical activity. Discussion In this study, we will evaluate the differential effectiveness of nutritional support and NMES during HD on muscle strength, muscle mass, physical function, and QOL. We expect that this study can provide guidelines for a new therapeutic option for HD patients who are unable or hesitant to exercise. Furthermore, this option can offer an opportunity to improve the physical function, QOL, and prognosis of HD patients. Trial registration Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS), Korea, KCT0005573. Retrospectively registered on 03 November 2020

scholarly journals The Effectiveness Of Quadriceps Strengthening Exercises Combined With Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2_suppl2) ◽  
pp. 2325967117S0010
Author(s):  
Sezen Karabörklü Argut ◽  
Nilgün Türker ◽  
Derya Çelik ◽  
Önder İsmet Kılıçoğlu
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Muscle Strength ◽  
Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Pain Syndrome ◽  
Quadriceps Strength ◽  
Patellofemoral Pain ◽  
Group I ◽  
Strengthening Exercises ◽  
Group Ii ◽  
And Function

Objective: The weakness of the quadriceps strength in patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) is very evident. Therefore, quadriceps strengthening exercises are very important part of the rehabilitation program. Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) is considered one of the methods for increasing quadriceps muscle strength. To evaluate the effectiveness of combined NMES and strengthening exercises to improve the recovery of quadriceps strength and function in patients with PFPS. Methods: This study was planned as a randomized controlled pilot study. A total of 27 patients (mean age=38.9±10.8 years, range=20-60 years; 16 females) with PFPS were assessed and randomly assigned into 2 groups. Group I received a standard program (quadriceps strengthening, hip strengthening and hamstring stretching) and NMES combined with quadriceps strengthening exercises simultaneously. Group II received the same standard program without NMES. Both groups were enrolled 3 times per week for 40 minutes per day in 6 weeks. Patients were assessed at the baseline, 3 rd, 6th, and 12th weeks of treatment. Quadriceps strength was evaluated by isokinetic dynamometer. The range of motion at testing was set between 0 for extension to 90 for flexion. The test was performed at 60 degrees/sn and concentric maximum peak torque value was recorded. Kujala and Lysholm scores were used for functional assessments. The data were analyzed using the SPSS 20.0. Shapiro-Wilk test was used to assess the distribution of data. The changes in dependent variables before treatment, 3 rd, 6th, and 12th weeks were analyzed using a 2 by 4 mixed-model analysis of variance (ANOVA). Pairwise comparisons with paired t test were used to determine whether the Group I or Group II, has changed over time. An intention- to- treat analysis was performed to impute values for missing data. An alpha level of 0.05 was established. Results: The study was completed with 20 patients. Group I (n=10; mean age=39.4±8.5 years; 7 females) and group II (n=10; mean age=43.2±11.7 years; 5 females) had no differences in pre-operative measures (p>.05). There was significant improvements in within groups statistics of all parameters for both groups (p<.05). No differences in quadriceps strength, Kujala and Lysholm scores between groups were found at the different time points (F= 0.86; p = 0.12, F=0,001; p =0.97, F=0.12; p=0.73, respectively) Conclusion: NMES combined with quadriceps strengthening exercises has no additional effect on PFPS patients’ on muscle strength and function. When considering these results, we believe that there is no need to continue the study in progress. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document