scholarly journals Status and biology of ringed seals (Phoca hispida) in Svalbard

1998 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Lydersen
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass ◽  
Dive Duration ◽  
Early Spring ◽  
Ringed Seal ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Polar Cod ◽  
Net Energy ◽  
Adult Males ◽  
Ringed Seals ◽  
Males And Females

The ringed seal is the most abundant mammal in the Svalbard area. Annual pup production in this area is estimated to be 20,000. No systematic harvest records exist, but some few hundred seals are taken annually, mainly for dog food. The ringed seals in Svalbard are protected from hunting in the period 15 March - 15 April. Peak pupping season is the first week of April. New-born ringed seals weigh an average of 4.6 kg. They are nursed for about 39 days, and weaned at an average body mass of around 22 kg. During the period of maternal care pups consume a total of about 54 litres of milk, that is composed of approximately 38% fat and 10% protein. Asymptotic standard lengths and body masses for adult ringed seal males and females are 131.5 and 127.8 cm, and 52.6 and 59.9 kg,respectively. The maximum values recorded for lengths of males and females in Svalbard are 157 cm and 107 kg, respectively. There is marked seasonal variation in body mass in both sexes with the highest mass records being recorded in early spring before pupping occurs, and with minimum values in the summer after the breeding and moulting seasons. The observed variation in mass is mainly due to changing blubber thickness of the seals. Ringed seal males attain sexual maturity at the age of 5 - 7 years, while females reach maturity when they are 3-5 years of age. The oldest seal collected in Svalbard was aged 45. Ringed seals in the Svalbard area feed on a variety of prey organisms, the most important of which are polar cod (Boreogadus saida) and the crustaceans Parathemisto libellula, Thysanoessa inermis and Pandalus borealis. Ringed seal pups start diving during the nursing period while they are still white-coats, and spend about 50% of the time in thewater prior to weaning. They are capable of diving for up to 12min and dive to the bottom of the study areas (max. 89 m). Nursing females spend more than 80% of their time in the water. Maximum recorded dive duration for mothers was 21.2 min. In order to produce a weaned pup, the net energy expenditure for a ringed seal mother is 1,073 MJ. This energy value corresponds to the consumption of 185 kg of polar cod or 282 kg of P. libellula. The annual gross energy consumption for adult males and females is calculated to be 5,600 MJ and 7,300 MJ, respectively. The main predators of ringed seals in Svalbard are polar bears (Ursus maritimus) and Arctic foxes (Alopex lagopus). In addition, both glaucous gulls (Larus hyperboreus) and walruses (Odobenus rosmarus) are documented as predators of ringed seals in this area. Heavy predation pressure is probably the main factor explaining why pups of this species start diving at such a young age, why they have access to so many breathing holes (8.7 on average) and why they keep their white coat long after its thermoregulatory properties have vanished. Pollution levels in ringed seals from Svalbard are, generally speaking, similar to levels in other areas of the Arctic.

Population parameters of ringed seals (Phoca hispida Schreber, 1775) in the Svalbard area

1987 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
pp. 1021-1027 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Lydersen ◽  
Ian Gjertz
Keyword(s):  
Sex Ratio ◽  
Ringed Seal ◽  
Adult Males ◽  
Population Parameters ◽  
Phoca Hispida ◽  
Age Class ◽  
Ringed Seals ◽  
Males And Females ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Sexually Mature

Samples were taken from 284 ringed seals (Phoca hispida) in the Svalbard area during April–July 1981 and March–April 1982. The age of 283 seals was determined by reading annuli in the cementum of the canine teeth. The mean age of the males was 11.3 years, and of the females, 14.9 years. Females were found to be significantly older than males. The mean length of sexually mature ringed seals was 128.9 cm for both sexes. The mean weight of adult males and females was 53.5 and 61.4 kg, respectively. Females were found to be significantly heavier than males. The sex ratio was 47.8% males and 52.2% females. Studies of microscopic sections of testis and epididymis from ringed seal males showed that 63, 75, and 80% of 5-, 6-, and 7-year-old animals, respectively, were sexually mature. The weights of testis and epididymis, diameters of tubuli, and the size of testis all showed a marked increase in the 5-year age-class. Macroscopic sections of ovaries from ringed seal females showed that 20, 60, and 80% of 3-, 4-, and 5-year-old animals, respectively, were sexually mature. The size of the ovaries showed a marked increase in the 5-year age-class. The ovulation rate of ringed seals from Svalbard was calculated to be 0.91.

Seasonal changes in body mass and body composition of ringed seals (Phoca hispida) on Svalbard

1990 ◽  
Vol 68 (3) ◽  
pp. 470-475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morten Ryg ◽  
Thomas G. Smith ◽  
Nils Are Øritsland
Keyword(s):  
Body Composition ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Seasonal Changes ◽  
Adult Males ◽  
Phoca Hispida ◽  
Core Mass ◽  
Adult Females ◽  
Ringed Seals ◽  
Body Fat Content ◽  
Body Mass Changes

Seasonal changes in body mass and body composition of ringed seals (Phoca hispida) from the Svalbard Islands are described. The blubber content of adult females decreased from a high of about 50% at the beginning of the pupping season in March–April to a low of 31% during moulting in June. In adult males, the blubber content decreased from 41% in March to 29% in June. By estimating an individual seal's body mass by 1 April from its standard body length, we calculated an average daily loss of body mass of 160 g/day in adult females and 100 g/day in adult males from the start of lactation to the middle of moulting. The blubber content of sexually immature seals was less in June and July than in April, but the seasonal changes were smaller than in adult seals. We found no evidence of significant changes in core mass in adult seals, and suggest that the seasonal body mass changes are mostly due to changes in body fat content.

scholarly journals Distribution, abundance and biology of ringed seals (Phoca hispida): an overview

1998 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Randall R Reeves
Keyword(s):  
Polar Bear ◽  
Late Summer ◽  
Early Summer ◽  
Ringed Seal ◽  
Late Spring ◽  
Late Winter ◽  
Polar Cod ◽  
World Population ◽  
Phoca Hispida ◽  
Ringed Seals

The ringed seal (Phoca hispida) has a circumpolar Arctic distribution. Because of its great importance to northern communities and its role as the primary food of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) the ringed seal has been studied extensively in Canada, Alaska, Russia, Svalbard and Greenland as well as in the Baltic Sea and Karelian lakes. No clear-cut boundaries are known to separate ringed seal stocks in marine waters. Adult seals are thought to be relatively sedentary, but sub-adults sometimes disperse over long distances. Stable ice with good snow cover is considered the most productive habitat although production in pack ice has been little studied. Populations appear to be structured so that immature animals and young adults are consigned to sub-optimal habitat during the spring pupping and breeding season. Annual production in ringed seal populations, defined as thepup percentage in the total population after the late winter pupping season, is probably in the order of 18-24%. Most estimates of maximum sustainable yield are in the order of 7%.The world population of ringed seals is at least a few million. Methods of abundance estimation have included aerial surveys, dog searches and remote sensing of lairs and breathing holes, acoustic monitoring, correlation analysis by reference to sizes of polar bear populations, and inference from estimated energy requirements of bear populations. Aerial strip survey has been the method of choice for estimating seal densities over large areas. Adjustment factors to account for seals not hauled out at the time of the survey, for seals that dove ahead of the aircraft, and for seals on the ice within the surveyed strip but not detected by the observers, are required for estimates of absolute abundance.Male and female ringed seals are sexually mature by 5-7 years of age (earlier at Svalbard). Pupping usually occurs in March or early April and is followed by 5-7 weeks of lactation. Breeding takes place in mid to late May, and implantation is delayed for about 3 months. In at least some parts of their range, ringed seals feed mainly on schooling gadids from late autumn through early spring andon benthic crustaceans and polar cod (Boreogadus saida) from late spring through summer. Little feeding is done during the moult, which takes place in late spring and early summer. Pelagic crustaceans offshore and mysids inshore become important prey in late summer and early autumn in some areas. Ringed seals have several natural predators, the most important of which is the polar bear in most arctic regions. Arctic foxes (Alopex lagopus) kill a large percentage of pups in someareas.From a conservation perspective, the ringed seal appears to be secure. Levels of exploitation of arctic populations have usually been considered sustainable, except in the Okhotsk Sea. Large fluctuations in production of ringed seals in the Beaufort Sea and Amundsen Gulf are thought to be driven by natural variability in environmental conditions. While concern has been expressed about thepotential impacts of industrial activity and pollution on ringed seals, such impacts have been documented only in limited areas. Because of their ubiquitous occurrence and availability for sampling, ringed seals are good subjects for monitoring contaminant trends in Arctic marine food chains. 

Spatiotemporal use of lairs by ringed seals (Phoca hispida)

1990 ◽  
Vol 68 (12) ◽  
pp. 2503-2512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brendan P. Kelly ◽  
Lori T. Quakenbush
Keyword(s):  
Early Spring ◽  
Late Spring ◽  
Phoca Hispida ◽  
Ringed Seals ◽  
Fast Ice ◽  
Males And Females

Thirteen ringed seals monitored by radiotelemetry in the shore-fast ice of the Beaufort and Chukchi seas were faithful to subnivean haulout sites from March to June. Each seal frequented as many as four lairs; the distances between lairs used by individual seals were as great as 3438 m. Mean distances between lairs used by individual males and females were 1997 and 634 m, respectively. Seals were not commonly seen resting on the ice outside of lairs until late May or June, but two radio-tagged male seals began basking on 15 April and 7 May, respectively. The proportion of time spent out of the water was 12.1% in March, 18.6% in April, 21.9% in May, and 42.9% in early June. From late March to June, males were out of the water during 13.1% of the monitored periods, and females were out of the water during 24.0% of those periods. Mean hours of haulout bouts were between 18:00 and 02:30 in early spring (except for a lactating female who hauled out most frequently at 11:00) and between 10:00 and 16:30 in late spring.

scholarly journals Growth and population parameters of ringed seals (Pusa hispida) from Svalbard, Norway, 2002–2004

2006 ◽  
Vol 63 (6) ◽  
pp. 1136-1144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bjørn A. Krafft ◽  
Kit M. Kovacs ◽  
Anne Kirstine Frie ◽  
Tore Haug ◽  
Christian Lydersen
Keyword(s):  
Ringed Seal ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Strong Impact ◽  
Climate Change Scenarios ◽  
Population Parameters ◽  
Ringed Seals ◽  
Asymptotic Values ◽  
Seal Population ◽  
Pusa Hispida ◽  
Sexually Mature

AbstractSamples were collected in Svalbard, Norway, during April and May 2002–2004 from 272 ringed seals (Pusa hispida; 62.5% males, 37.5% females) to study growth and population parameters. The age of the animals ranged from 1 to 32 years. Asymptotic values for standard length and body mass were 127.7 ± 1.6 (s.e.) cm and 69.0 ± 2.7 kg for males (maxima: 144 cm and 92 kg) and 127.6 ± 2.3 cm and 68.9 ± 2.5 kg for females (maxima: 141 cm and 91 kg). All animals were sexually mature at an age ≥6 years and the ovulation rate was 0.86. Mean Age at Maturity (MAM) was 4.2 ± 0.2 years for males and 3.5 ± 0.3 years for females, values significantly lower than calculated for ringed seals from the same area 20 years ago. This change in MAM suggests that either the prey base for ringed seals in the area has increased or alternatively that the density of ringed seals has declined, such that more resources are available per capita. If the climate of the Arctic changes in the manner predicted by a host of climate-change scenarios, it is likely to have a strong impact on ringed seal populations in future, although there are no data to suggest that dramatic changes have taken place yet in fish and invertebrate populations in the Svalbard area. Although cause-and-effect cannot be firmly established, there is a possibility that the substantial increase in the number of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) over the past 20 years, since hunting the species in Svalbard ceased in 1973, may have played a role in the observed change in the ringed seal population.

Ringed seal diving behavior in the breeding season

1996 ◽  
Vol 74 (8) ◽  
pp. 1547-1555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brendan P. Kelly ◽  
Douglas Wartzok
Keyword(s):  
Breeding Season ◽  
Light Level ◽  
Dive Depth ◽  
Dive Duration ◽  
Ringed Seal ◽  
Diving Behavior ◽  
Adult Males ◽  
Phoca Hispida ◽  
Oxygen Stores ◽  
Lactating Females

The behavior of 14 ringed seals (Phoca hispida) diving under shore-fast sea ice was monitored acoustically during the spring breeding season. Frequent dives with extended periods at depth by subadult and adult seals, including lactating females, were interpreted to be foraging dives. Median dive durations were less than 10.0 min for all seals, and the maximal observed duration was 26.4 min. The maximal observed dive depth, 222 m, was limited by water depth in the study area. Modal dive depths were between 10 and 45 m for breeding-age males and between 100 and 145 m for subadult males and postparturient females. Median dive durations were 4.0 min for adult males and 7.5 min for adult females. Body mass was a better predictor of maximal dive duration (r2 = 0.94) than was age, but maximal durations were shorter than were predicted using measures of oxygen stores and presumed metabolic rates. There was no consistent relationship between light level and the frequency or depth of dives.

Captures, Body Mass and Diet of Platypuses in a Subalpine Tasmanian Lake.

1998 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 311
Author(s):  
S.A. Munks ◽  
H.M. Otley ◽  
J. Jackson ◽  
M. Hindell
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass ◽  
Early Spring ◽  
Late Winter ◽  
Adult Males ◽  
Catch Per Unit Effort ◽  
Doubly Labelled Water ◽  
Food Items ◽  
Adult Females ◽  
Unit Effort ◽  
Significant Difference

Studies into the ecology of the platypus have concentrated on populations inhabiting !otic waters on mainland Australia. This paper presents preliminary results of a study into the feeding ecology and energetics of the platypus in a subalpine lake in Tasmania. During the autumn, winter and early spring months 29 individual platypuses were captured (13 adult females, 13 adult males and 3 juveniles). Of these, 46% of the adult males, 31% of the adult females and one of the juveniles were recaptured between one and eight times. Catch per unit effort was similar for the 1800-2400hrs, 0600-1200hrs and 1200-1800hrs time periods (0.158, 0.161 and 0.156, respectively). However catch per unit effort was low (0.057) between 2400hr and 0600hrs. There was no significant difference in the mean body mass of adult males and females between autumn, winter and early spring, however the condition of the females, indicated by the tail fat index, decreased in early spring. The overall mean body mass for adult males and adult females caught during the autumn/winter and early spring months was 2293.21g ± 300 (1920-2740g) and 1375.22g ± 147 (1150-1580g), respectively. This supports the observation that platypuses in Tasmania are larger than those occurring in mainland water bodies. The timing of juvenile captures suggests that matings occur at Lake Lea between mid September through to January. This indicates that the breeding season may be later in Tasmania than on the mainland. The contents of cheek pouches were collected from individuals caught during the autumn, winter and early spring months for identification of food items. Food items identified so far include Trichoptera, Gastropod molluscs, Ephemeroptera nymphs, Coleoptera larvae and Diptera, with Trichoptera forming the dominant food item. Measurements of the daily energy expenditure of six adults were attempted during late winter and early spring using the doubly labelled water technique.

scholarly journals Spring diet of ringed seals (Phoca hispida) from northwestern Spitsbergen, Norway

2007 ◽  
Vol 64 (6) ◽  
pp. 1246-1256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aili L. Labansen ◽  
Christian Lydersen ◽  
Tore Haug ◽  
Kit M. Kovacs
Keyword(s):  
Prey Size ◽  
Prey Type ◽  
Polar Cod ◽  
Adult Males ◽  
Phoca Hispida ◽  
Hard Part ◽  
Ringed Seals ◽  
Length Range ◽  
Polar Cod Boreogadus Saida ◽  
Seal Diet

AbstractLabansen, A. L., Lydersen, C., Haug, T., and Kovacs, K. M. 2007. Spring diet of ringed seals (Phoca hispida) from northwestern Spitsbergen, Norway. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 64: 1246–1256. Complete gastro-intestinal tracts (GITs) from 267 ringed seals from five different locations in Spitsbergen were collected during spring of the years 2002–2004. Diet was assessed based on hard part remains from prey. Invertebrates constituted <2% of all prey (relative frequency, Ni). Fish otoliths were found in all seals; 1.7, 34.3, and 64.0% of the recovered otoliths were found in the stomach, small and large intestines, respectively, emphasizing the importance of analysing the whole GIT, not only the stomach. Otoliths from stomachs and small intestines with minimal signs of erosion were measured to back-calculate pre-ingested prey size and biomass. Based on measured polar cod (Boreogadus saida) otoliths (n = 7007), the ringed seals fed on fish in the length range 44.4–229.2 mm, primarily consuming the youngest year classes. Adult females ate smaller polar cod more often than adult males or juveniles. Polar cod dominated the diet, with a frequency of occurrence (FO) of 100%, Ni of 71.9%, and a biomass contribution of 77.2%. The taxon Stichaeidae was the second most frequent prey type (FO = 55.6%) followed by Cottidae (FO = 35.6%). The diet of ringed seals from one locality markedly differed from the others, with a greater species diversity, low Ni of polar cod (15%), and a dominance of Stichaeidae (Ni = 67%). Location of sampling, as well as sex and age of the seals, had significant influences on ringed seal diet in spring.

Size-At-Age Variability and Sexual Dimorphism of Morphometric Characteristics in the Late Ontogenesis of the Marsh Frog, Pelophylax Ridibundus (Anura, Ranidae), from Terrytory of Crimea

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 325-334
Author(s):  
V. N. Peskov ◽  
N. A. Petrenko ◽  
V. Yu. Reminnyi
Keyword(s):  
Age Groups ◽  
The Body ◽  
Adult Males ◽  
Morphometric Characteristics ◽  
Morphometric Characters ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
Marsh Frog ◽  
Males And Females ◽  
Size At Age ◽  
Linear Body

Abstract We study size-at-age and sexual variability of morphometric characteristics of the marsh frog. According to the size of the body, males were divided into three size-age groups (juvenis, subadultus, adultus), females — into four groups (juvenis, subadultus, adultus, adultus-I). We found that the chronological age of frogs (skeletochronology) does not always correspond to their biological age (size and proportions of the body). We noted that the semi-adult males are reliably larger than females by mean values of 26 studied morphometric characters. Males and females of “adultus” group do not differ by linear body size, significant differences were found in body proportions (7 characters). For the females of “adultus-I” group, the mean values of 26 characters are significantly larger than for “adultus” males. The results of our study showed that with the age of the marsh frog, the level of exhibition, directionality and structure of morphometric sex differences changes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document