scholarly journals The ubiquitin-proteasome system regulates focal adhesions at the leading edge of migrating cells

eLife ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anjali Teckchandani ◽  
Jonathan A Cooper
Keyword(s):  
Cell Migration ◽  
Focal Adhesion ◽  
Focal Adhesions ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Ubiquitin Proteasome System ◽  
Cytokine Signaling ◽  
Focal Adhesion Proteins ◽  
Cullin 5 ◽  
Ubiquitin Proteasome ◽  
Spatio Temporal

Cell migration requires the cyclical assembly and disassembly of focal adhesions. Adhesion induces phosphorylation of focal adhesion proteins, including Cas (Crk-associated substrate/p130Cas/BCAR1). However, Cas phosphorylation stimulates adhesion turnover. This raises the question of how adhesion assembly occurs against opposition from phospho-Cas. Here we show that suppressor of cytokine signaling 6 (SOCS6) and Cullin 5, two components of the CRL5SOCS6 ubiquitin ligase, inhibit Cas-dependent focal adhesion turnover at the front but not rear of migrating epithelial cells. The front focal adhesions contain phospho-Cas which recruits SOCS6. If SOCS6 cannot access focal adhesions, or if cullins or the proteasome are inhibited, adhesion disassembly is stimulated. This suggests that the localized targeting of phospho-Cas within adhesions by CRL5SOCS6 and concurrent cullin and proteasome activity provide a negative feedback loop, ensuring that adhesion assembly predominates over disassembly at the leading edge. By this mechanism, ubiquitination provides a new level of spatio-temporal control over cell migration.

scholarly journals Rab40/Cullin5 complex regulates EPLIN and actin cytoskeleton dynamics during cell migration and invasion

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik S Linklater ◽  
Emily Duncan ◽  
Ke Jun Han ◽  
Algirdas Kaupinis ◽  
Mindaugas Valius ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Migration ◽  
Actin Cytoskeleton ◽  
Focal Adhesion ◽  
Focal Adhesions ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Stress Fibers ◽  
Actin Dynamics ◽  
Migration And Invasion ◽  
Matrix Remodeling ◽  
Cell Migration And Invasion

Rab40b is a SOCS box containing protein that regulates the secretion of MMPs to facilitate extracellular matrix remodeling during cell migration. Here we show that Rab40b interacts with Cullin5 via the Rab40b SOCS domain. We demonstrate that loss of Rab40b/Cullin5 binding decreases cell motility and invasive potential, and show that defective cell migration and invasion stem from alteration to the actin cytoskeleton, leading to decreased invadopodia formation, decreased actin dynamics at the leading edge, and an increase in stress fibers. We also show that these stress fibers anchor at less dynamic, more stable focal adhesions. Mechanistically, changes in the cytoskeleton and focal adhesion dynamics are mediated in part by EPLIN, which we demonstrate to be a binding partner of Rab40b and a target for Rab40b/Cullin5 dependent localized ubiquitylation and degradation. Thus, we propose a model where the Rab40b/Cullin5 dependent ubiquitylation regulates EPLIN localization to promote cell migration and invasion by altering focal adhesion and cytoskeletal dynamics.

scholarly journals Interaction of monocarboxylate transporter 4 with β1-integrin and its role in cell migration

2009 ◽  
Vol 296 (3) ◽  
pp. C414-C421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shannon M. Gallagher ◽  
John J. Castorino ◽  
Nancy J. Philp
Keyword(s):  
Cell Migration ◽  
Focal Adhesion ◽  
Mdck Cells ◽  
Basolateral Membrane ◽  
Specific Interaction ◽  
Cell Movement ◽  
Focal Adhesions ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Monocarboxylate Transporter ◽  
Epithelial Cell Lines

Monocarboxylate transporter (MCT) 4 is a heteromeric proton-coupled lactate transporter that is noncovalently linked to the extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer CD147 and is typically expressed in glycolytic tissues. There is increasing evidence to suggest that ion transporters are part of macromolecular complexes involved in regulating β1-integrin adhesion and cell movement. In the present study we examined whether MCTs play a role in cell migration through their interaction with β1-integrin. Using reciprocal coimmunoprecipitation assays, we found that β1-integrin selectively associated with MCT4 in ARPE-19 and MDCK cells, two epithelial cell lines that express both MCT1 and MCT4. In polarized monolayers of ARPE-19 cells, MCT4 and β1-integrin colocalized to the basolateral membrane, while both proteins were found in the leading edge lamellapodia of migrating cells. In scratch-wound assays, MCT4 knockdown slowed migration and increased focal adhesion size. In contrast, silencing MCT1 did not alter the rate of cell migration or focal adhesion size. Taken together, our findings suggest that the specific interaction of MCT4 with β1-integrin may regulate cell migration through modulation of focal adhesions.

scholarly journals Retrograde Fluxes of Focal Adhesion Proteins in Response to Cell Migration and Mechanical Signals

2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (11) ◽  
pp. 4519-4527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei-hui Guo ◽  
Yu-li Wang
Keyword(s):  
Cell Migration ◽  
Focal Adhesion ◽  
Mechanical Load ◽  
Focal Adhesions ◽  
Force Production ◽  
Retrograde Transport ◽  
Mechanical Stimuli ◽  
Adhesion Proteins ◽  
Mechanical Signals ◽  
Focal Adhesion Proteins

Recent studies suggest that mechanical signals mediated by the extracellular matrix play an essential role in various physiological and pathological processes; yet, how cells respond to mechanical stimuli remains elusive. Using live cell fluorescence imaging, we found that actin filaments, in association with a number of focal adhesion proteins, including zyxin and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein, undergo retrograde fluxes at focal adhesions in the lamella region. This flux is inversely related to cell migration, such that it is amplified in fibroblasts immobilized on micropatterned islands. In addition, the flux is regulated by mechanical signals, including stretching forces applied to flexible substrates and substrate stiffness. Conditions favoring the flux share the common feature of causing large retrograde displacements of the interior actin cytoskeleton relative to the substrate anchorage site, which may function as a switch translating mechanical input into chemical signals, such as tyrosine phosphorylation. In turn, the stimulation of actin flux at focal adhesions may function as part of a feedback mechanism, regulating structural assembly and force production in relation to cell migration and mechanical load. The retrograde transport of associated focal adhesion proteins may play additional roles in delivering signals from focal adhesions to the interior of the cell.

scholarly journals Migration regulates cellular mechanical states

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (26) ◽  
pp. 3104-3111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie S. Chang ◽  
Andrew D. Rape ◽  
Stephanie A. Wong ◽  
Wei-hui Guo ◽  
Yu-li Wang
Keyword(s):  
Cell Migration ◽  
Focal Adhesion ◽  
Focal Adhesions ◽  
Traction Forces ◽  
Adhesion Proteins ◽  
Focal Adhesion Proteins

Cell migration has a profound effect on the generation of traction forces and the phosphorylation of focal adhesion proteins. The mechanism may involve the dynamic turnover of focal adhesions during cell migration and mechanical interactions between nascent and preexisting focal adhesions.

scholarly journals Rab40–Cullin5 complex regulates EPLIN and actin cytoskeleton dynamics during cell migration

2021 ◽  
Vol 220 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik S. Linklater ◽  
Emily D. Duncan ◽  
Ke-Jun Han ◽  
Algirdas Kaupinis ◽  
Mindaugas Valius ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Migration ◽  
Actin Cytoskeleton ◽  
Focal Adhesion ◽  
Focal Adhesions ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Stress Fibers ◽  
Actin Dynamics ◽  
Migration And Invasion ◽  
Matrix Remodeling ◽  
Cell Migration And Invasion

Rab40b is a SOCS box–containing protein that regulates the secretion of MMPs to facilitate extracellular matrix remodeling during cell migration. Here, we show that Rab40b interacts with Cullin5 via the Rab40b SOCS domain. We demonstrate that loss of Rab40b–Cullin5 binding decreases cell motility and invasive potential and show that defective cell migration and invasion stem from alteration to the actin cytoskeleton, leading to decreased invadopodia formation, decreased actin dynamics at the leading edge, and an increase in stress fibers. We also show that these stress fibers anchor at less dynamic, more stable focal adhesions. Mechanistically, changes in the cytoskeleton and focal adhesion dynamics are mediated in part by EPLIN, which we demonstrate to be a binding partner of Rab40b and a target for Rab40b–Cullin5-dependent localized ubiquitylation and degradation. Thus, we propose a model where Rab40b–Cullin5-dependent ubiquitylation regulates EPLIN localization to promote cell migration and invasion by altering focal adhesion and cytoskeletal dynamics.

scholarly journals A Cas-BCAR3 co-regulatory circuit controls lamellipodia dynamics

eLife ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth M Steenkiste ◽  
Jason D Berndt ◽  
Carissa Pilling ◽  
Christopher Simpkins ◽  
Jonathan A Cooper
Keyword(s):  
Cell Migration ◽  
Phosphorylation Site ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Ubiquitin Proteasome System ◽  
Sh2 Domain ◽  
Downstream Signaling ◽  
Regulatory Circuit ◽  
Positive Feedback Circuit ◽  
Ubiquitin Proteasome ◽  
And Migration

Integrin adhesion complexes regulate cytoskeletal dynamics during cell migration. Adhesion activates phosphorylation of integrin-associated signaling proteins, including Cas (p130Cas, BCAR1), by Src-family kinases. Cas regulates leading-edge protrusion and migration in cooperation with its binding partner, BCAR3. However, it has been unclear how Cas and BCAR3 cooperate. Here, using normal epithelial cells, we find that BCAR3 localization to integrin adhesions requires Cas. In return, Cas phosphorylation, as well as lamellipodia dynamics and cell migration, requires BCAR3. These functions require the BCAR3 SH2 domain and a specific phosphorylation site, Tyr 117, that is also required for BCAR3 downregulation by the ubiquitin-proteasome system. These findings place BCAR3 in a co-regulatory positive-feedback circuit with Cas, with BCAR3 requiring Cas for localization and Cas requiring BCAR3 for activation and downstream signaling. The use of a single phosphorylation site in BCAR3 for activation and degradation ensures reliable negative feedback by the ubiquitin-proteasome system.

scholarly journals Regulation of cell migration and survival by focal adhesion targeting of Lasp-1

2004 ◽  
Vol 165 (3) ◽  
pp. 421-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Hsing Lin ◽  
Zee-Yong Park ◽  
Dayin Lin ◽  
Anar A. Brahmbhatt ◽  
Marie-Christine Rio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Migration ◽  
Growth Factors ◽  
Focal Adhesion ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Actin Polymerization ◽  
Focal Adhesions ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Actin Binding ◽  
Cell Periphery ◽  
Ecm Proteins

Large-scale proteomic and functional analysis of isolated pseudopodia revealed the Lim, actin, and SH3 domain protein (Lasp-1) as a novel protein necessary for cell migration, but not adhesion to, the extracellular matrix (ECM). Lasp-1 is a ubiquitously expressed actin-binding protein with a unique domain configuration containing SH3 and LIM domains, and is overexpressed in 8–12% of human breast cancers. We find that stimulation of nonmotile and quiescent cells with growth factors or ECM proteins facilitates Lasp-1 relocalization from the cell periphery to the leading edge of the pseudopodium, where it associates with nascent focal complexes and areas of actin polymerization. Interestingly, although Lasp-1 dynamics in migratory cells occur independently of c-Abl kinase activity and tyrosine phosphorylation, c-Abl activation by apoptotic agents specifically promotes phosphorylation of Lasp-1 at tyrosine 171, which is associated with the loss of Lasp-1 localization to focal adhesions and induction of cell death. Thus, Lasp-1 is a dynamic focal adhesion protein necessary for cell migration and survival in response to growth factors and ECM proteins.

Indomethacin Delays Gastric Restitution: Association with the Inhibition of Focal Adhesion Kinase and Tensin Phosphorylation and Reduced Actin Stress Fibers

2002 ◽  
Vol 227 (6) ◽  
pp. 412-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
Imre L. Szabó ◽  
Rama Pai ◽  
Michael K. Jones ◽  
George R. Ehring ◽  
Hirofumi Kawanaka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Migration ◽  
Focal Adhesion ◽  
Focal Adhesions ◽  
Stress Fiber ◽  
Fiber Formation ◽  
Stress Fibers ◽  
Actin Stress Fiber ◽  
Stress Fiber Formation ◽  
Actin Stress Fiber Formation

Repair of superficial gastric mucosal injury is accomplished by the process of restitution—migration of epithelial cells to restore continuity of the mucosal surface. Actin filaments, focal adhesions, and focal adhesion kinase (FAK) play crucial roles in cell motility essential for restitution. We studied whether epidermal growth factor (EGF) and/or indomethacin (IND) affect cell migration, actin stress fiber formation, and/or phosphorylation of FAK and tensin in wounded gastric monolayers. Human gastric epithelial monolayers (MKN 28 cells) were wounded and treated with either vehicle or 0.5 mM IND for 16 hr followed by EGF. EGF treatment significantly stimulated cell migration and actin stress fiber formation, and increased FAK localization to focal adhesions, and phosphorylation of FAK and tensin, whereas IND inhibited all these at the baseline and EGF-stimulated conditions. IND-induced inhibition of FAK phosphorylation preceded changes in actin polymerization, indicating that actin depolymerization might be the consequence of decreased FAK activity. In in vivo experiments, rats received either vehicle or IND (5 mg/kg i.g.), and 3 min later, they received water or 5% hypertonic NaCl; gastric mucosa was obtained at 1, 4, and 8 hr after injury. Four and 8 hr after hypertonic injury, FAK phosphorylation was induced in gastric mucosa compared with controls. IND pretreatment significantly delayed epithelial restitution in vivo, and reduced FAK phosphorylation and recruitment to adhesion points, as well as actin stress fiber formation in migrating surface epithelial cells. Our study indicates that FAK, tensin, and actin stress fibers are likely mediators of EGF-stimulated cell migration in wounded human gastric monolayers and potential targets for IND-induced inhibition of restitution.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document