scholarly journals Differences in Faculty and Standardized Patient Scores on Professionalism for Second-Year Podiatric Medical Students During a Standardized Simulated Patient Encounter

2018 ◽  
Vol 108 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-150
Author(s):  
James M. Mahoney ◽  
Vassilios Vardaxis ◽  
Noreen Anwar ◽  
Jacob Hagenbucher

Background: This study examined the differences between faculty and trained standardized patient (SP) evaluations on student professionalism during a second-year podiatric medicine standardized simulated patient encounter. Methods: Forty-nine second-year podiatric medicine students were evaluated for their professionalism behavior. Eleven SPs performed an assessment in real-time, and one faculty member performed a secondary assessment after observing a videotape of the encounter. Five domains were chosen for evaluation from a validated professionalism assessment tool. Results: Significant differences were identified in the professionalism domains of “build a relationship” (P = .008), “gather information” (P = .001), and share information (P = .002), where the faculty scored the students higher than the SP for 24.5%, 18.9%, and 26.5% of the cases, respectively. In addition, the faculty scores were higher than the SP scores in all of the “gather information” subdomains; however, the difference in scores was significant only in the “question appropriately” (P = .001) and “listen and clarify” (P = .003) subdomains. Conclusions: This study showed that professionalism scores for second-year podiatric medical students during a simulated patient encounter varied significantly between faculty and SPs. Further consideration needs to be given to determine the source of these differences.

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily L. Unrue ◽  
Grayson White ◽  
Ning Cheng ◽  
Tom Lindsey

Abstract Context Although the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has accelerated the use of telemedicine platforms across the country, medical students may lack confidence in their ability to conduct satisfactory patient encounters and practice clinical medicine through telemedicine. Objectives To evaluate the role of a standardized patient encounter on first year medical student confidence and satisfaction in using telemedicine. Methods One hundred and sixty two first year medical students recruited from Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine-Carolinas campus were surveyed on their confidence and satisfaction with using telemedicine platforms before and after conducting a patient encounter. Participant confidence and satisfaction were assessed with a five point Likert scale: “not confident,” “a little confident,” “somewhat confident,” “confident,” and “extremely confident.” Results Of 162 students, 103 (63.6%) completed the preencounter survey and 74 (45.7%) completed the postencounter survey. Before the standardized patient encounter, 37 participants (35.9%) reported that they were “a little confident” and 20 participants (19.4%) reported that they were “not confident” in their ability to conduct a patient interview using a telemedicine platform. Following the encounter, 24 students (32.4%) reported feeling “somewhat confident”, and 32 (43.2%) reported feeling “confident” in their ability. Conclusions Medical students’ confidence and satisfaction with telemedicine improved after a standardized patient telemedicine experience in this study. This experience allowed students to practice the unique skills required for telemedicine. Medical schools might consider adding a telemedicine curriculum and standardized patient experiences in the undergraduate medical setting.


Author(s):  
Sarah Skelding

Motivational interviewing (MI), a partnership-based counselling style, has increasingly been used to promote behaviour change among adults. Despite its potential to support behaviour change, there is a lack of research examining the most effective ways to train health care practitioners to use MI when working with patients. The purpose of this research was to evaluate uptake of MI skills following a one-day MI workshop that was developed in partnership with Exercise is Medicine for second year medical students enrolled at Queen’s University. The workshop focused on developing a basic understanding of the MI spirit, the phases of MI, and the ways in which MI may be used in different behavioural contexts. Participants (n=69) were asked to complete a pre and post-questionnaire that explored their knowledge of MI and their current perceptions of MI in addition to completing the Helpful Responses Questionnaire (HRQ), a validated MI assessment tool. A process evaluation was also conducted for each facilitator to measure fidelity to MI during the workshop. Results from the process and outcome evaluations are currently being evaluated. Results from this study will help determine whether a one-day workshop format is an appropriate delivery method for teaching MI techniques. Future research is needed to determine if medical students utilize information gained in their medical practice.


Author(s):  
Mukta Pujani ◽  
Varsha Chauhan ◽  
Charu Agarwal ◽  
Deepshikha Rana ◽  
Kanika Singh ◽  
...  

Background: Thalassemia can easily be prevented by awareness, education, screening, premarital genetic counselling and prenatal diagnosis. There are only a handful of articles on knowledge and awareness about thalassemia among general population or parents of thalassaemic children. Aims and objectives was to evaluate the level of awareness, knowledge and attitudes of medical students towards thalassemia as well as to analyse the differences if any between the first year and second year MBBS students and their correlation with various socio-demographic parameters.Methods: This was an institutional based cross sectional observational descriptive study regarding knowledge and attitude of first and second year MBBS students about thalassemia using a pre-designed, structured, self-administered questionnaire. Data was analyzed using SPSS software version 17. Values of p<0.05 were considered significant.Results: Mean knowledge scores of second year MBBS students compared to first year MBBS were 11.73±1.78 versus 10.8±1.92, the difference being statistically significant, however, the difference between mean attitude scores was not found to be significant. There was no effect of age, gender, region or Kuppuswamy’s socio-economic class on the knowledge or attitude of MBBS students towards thalassemia.Conclusions: Majority of the MBBS students had good knowledge and positive attitude towards thalassemia. To confirm the observations, large scale studies need to be conducted comprising of different study populations. Screening for thalassemia should be made mandatory, as part of medical examination, at entry to a medical college so that the medical college students are sensitized and can spread awareness among general population.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 14-15
Author(s):  
Robert T. Means

Background: The Covid-19 pandemic has created significant challenges for medical student education. Many if not most medical schools have placed significant limitations on direct patient contact by medical students which may persist indefinitely. Novel approaches are required to provide students with clinical experience. In response to this need, a case-based fourth year medical student (M4) elective was developed. Description of elective: In the first five offerings of the elective, two to nine M4 students enrolled. M4 electives are scheduled to begin on Mondays. On the first Monday morning, following a brief orientation, a lecture on aspects of the physical examination relevant to Hematology (such as physical findings of anemia, polycythemia, thrombocytopenia, lymph node examination, and spleen palpation) was presented using the Zoom application. Otherwise, the structure of Monday-Thursday sessions were identical. Each morning by 730 AM, students received an email containing a brief PowerPoint representing the information that was known to the Hematology attending at the time of initial clinic or inpatient referral. All identifiers were removed from the PowerPoint. All cases represented patients actually followed by the elective's faculty member (RTM). Students were expected to research the case and be prepared with additional history questions and additional laboratory tests. For tests requested, students were expected to have a plan for follow-up testing based on the different possible results. Students were also expected to have a differential diagnosis and, where appropriate, a proposal about whether treatment was indicated. At 1PM each day, students and the faculty member assembled on Zoom. After class discussion of the patient's presentation, diagnostic evaluation, and differential diagnosis. Images of blood and bone marrow were provide when appropriate. This segued into a discussion of the natural history, pathophysiology, and treatment of the patient's clinical diagnosis illustrated by the patient's results and clinical course. Rationale for the clinical decisions made were presented and discussed. Following the discussion, students were provided a copy of the discussion PowerPoint and copies of relevant references. For each case, students were expected to provide a reflective statement indicating what they had known before the case, what they had learned, and issues about which they had additional questions. The students were also asked to submit a diagnostic algorithm for the clinical topic discussed that is relevant for their residency career choice. Fridays used a different approach. The faculty physician presented an evolving case on Zoom in an effort to replicate something comparable to a real-time clinic experience. A microscope with a web-camera attachment was used to review the patient blood films. An example of elective topics in one offering of the elective is shown in Table 1. Results: Over the first five offerings of the selective, 30% of the M4 class participated. Three additional offerings are planned in this academic year. Students represented a diverse array of residency aspirations (Table 2), reflecting career aspirations of the overall class. End-of-elective feedback from students was uniformly positive. Features of the elective eliciting favorable comment included that these were real cases; the structure of the Monday - Thursday cases replicating a ward or clinic type experience (student "sees" the patient in the morning and then discusses the case at "attending rounds" in the afternoon); explication of clinical correlations of laboratory tests and their underlying mechanisms; the opportunity to think through the diagnosis while developing the algorithm for each case; feedback on the algorithms and reflective statements; and to the "real-time" nature of the evolving case. Suggestions for improvement mostly reflected a wish that additional areas be covered (lymphoma, acute leukemia and pediatric Hematology). Conclusions: The Covid-19 pandemic has created a need for creative approaches to clinical education and medical students. Hematology, with its strong connection to the diagnostic laboratory, is ideally situated to provide clinical exposure that allows clear correlation between patient presentation and natural history, foundational basic science, the diagnostic laboratory, and clinical management. Disclosures Means: WoltersKluwer: Patents & Royalties: Wintrobe Clinical Hematology editor; UpToDate author, editor; Cambridge University Press: Patents & Royalties: textbook editor; SpringerNature: Patents & Royalties: Textbook editor.


Author(s):  
Ji-Hyun Seo ◽  
Younglim Oh ◽  
Sunju Im ◽  
Do-Kyong Kim ◽  
Hyun-Hee Kong ◽  
...  

Purpose: The objective of this study was to evaluate the authenticity, acceptability, and feasibility of a hybrid station that combined a standardized patient encounter and a simulated Papanicolaou test. Methods: We introduced a hybrid station in the routine clinical skills examination (CSE) for 335 third-year medical students at 4 universities in Korea from December 1 to December 3, 2014. After the tests, we conducted an anonymous survey on the authenticity, acceptability, and feasibility of the hybrid station. Results: A total of 334 medical students and 17 professors completed the survey. A majority of the students (71.6%) and professors (82.4%) agreed that the hybrid station was more authentic than the standard CSE. Over 60 percent of the students and professors responded that the station was acceptable for assessing the students’ competence. Most of the students (75.2%) and professors (82.4%) assessed the required tasks as being feasible after reading the instructions. Conclusion: Our results showed that the hybrid CSE station was a highly authentic, acceptable, and feasible way to assess medical students’ performance.


MedEdPORTAL ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria-Louise Barilla-LaBarca ◽  
Monica Rodriguez ◽  
Kelly Connors ◽  
Theresa Wanamaker ◽  
Marie Cavuoto Petrizzo

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gagani Athauda ◽  
Joseph Ottolenghi ◽  
Carla Lupi ◽  
Sanaz Kashan ◽  
Elizabeth Gray ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document