Effects of Lateral and Medial Wedged Insoles on Knee and Ankle Internal Joint Moments During Walking in Healthy Men

2016 ◽  
Vol 106 (6) ◽  
pp. 411-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudiane A. Fukuchi ◽  
Ryan T. Lewinson ◽  
Jay T. Worobets ◽  
Darren J. Stefanyshyn

Background: Wedged insoles have been used to treat knee pathologies and to prevent injuries. Although they have received much attention for the study of knee injury, the effects of wedges on ankle joint biomechanics are not well understood. This study sought to evaluate the immediate effects of lateral and medial wedges on knee and ankle internal joint loading and center of pressure (CoP) in men during walking. Methods: Twenty-one healthy men walked at 1.4 m/sec in five footwear conditions: neutral, 6° (LW6) and 9° (LW9) lateral wedges, and 6° (MW6) and 9° (MW9) medial wedges. Peak internal knee abduction moments and angular impulses, internal ankle inversion moments and angular impulses, and mediolateral CoP were analyzed. Analysis of variance with post hoc analysis and Pearson correlations were performed to detect differences between conditions. Results: No differences in internal knee joint loading were found between neutral and any of the wedge conditions. However, as the wedge angle increased from medial to lateral, the internal ankle inversion moment (LW6: P = .020; LW9: P < .001; MW6: P = .046; MW9: P < .001) and angular impulse (LW9: P = .012) increased, and the CoP shifted laterally (LW9: P < .001) and medially (MW9: P < .001) compared with the neutral condition. Conclusions: Neither lateral nor medial wedges were effective in altering internal knee joint loading during walking. However, the greater internal ankle inversion moment and angular impulse observed with lateral wedges could lead to a higher risk of ankle injury. Thus, caution should be taken when lateral wedges need to be prescribed.

2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (sup1) ◽  
pp. S78-S79
Author(s):  
Frank Ingo Michel ◽  
Sebastian Campe ◽  
Eveline Silvia Graf ◽  
Katja Johanna Michel

2016 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. 51-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felix Stief ◽  
André Schmidt ◽  
Stefanie Adolf ◽  
Laura Kremer ◽  
Moamer Brkic ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012.24 (0) ◽  
pp. _8B25-1_-_8B25-2_
Author(s):  
Kazuhisa MIYATA ◽  
Mitsumasa MATSUDA

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kuang-Wei Lin ◽  
Li-Wei Chou ◽  
Yi-Tien Su ◽  
Shun-Hwa Wei ◽  
Chen-Sheng Chen

Abstract Background: Lateral wedges comprise a common conservative treatment for medial knee osteoarthritis (OA). However, use of lateral wedges might increases the ankle eversion moment. To minimize the risk of ankle joint, lateral wedges with custom arch support are suggested. However, the manufacturing process of a custom foot orthosis (FO) is complicated, labor intensive, and time consuming. The technology of 3D printing is an ideal method for mass customization. Therefore. the purpose of this study was to develop custom FOs using 3D printing techniques and to evaluate the biomechanical effects of 3D-printed FOs in patients with medial knee OA.Methods: Fifteen patients with medial knee OA were enrolled into this study. Kinematic and kinetic data were collected during walking by using an optical motion capture system. A paired-sample t-test was conducted to compare biomechanical variables under two conditions: walking in standard shoes (Shoe) and walking in shoes embedded with 3D-printed FOs (Shoe + FO).Results: Under the Shoe + FO condition, the center of pressure at the peak knee adduction moment significantly shifted laterally by 2.71 mm compared with the Shoe condition. No significant difference in the peak knee flexion moment was observed between the two conditions. In addition, both the first and second peak knee adduction moments were significantly reduced by 4.08% and 9.09% under the Shoe + FO condition. The 3D-printed FOs did not affect the ankle eversion moment but caused a decrease in the peak ankle inversion moment.Conclusions: The 3D-printed FOs caused a decrease in the ankle inversion moment, the first and second peak knee adduction moments by changing the center of pressure path laterally. Although the decrease in the knee flexion moment from the use of 3D-printed FOs was nonsignificant, such FOs engender biomechanical changes and positively influence the biomechanics of patients with knee OA.


Author(s):  
Jana Holder ◽  
Ursula Trinler ◽  
Andrea Meurer ◽  
Felix Stief

The assessment of knee or hip joint loading by external joint moments is mainly used to draw conclusions on clinical decision making. However, the correlation between internal and external loads has not been systematically analyzed. This systematic review aims, therefore, to clarify the relationship between external and internal joint loading measures during gait. A systematic database search was performed to identify appropriate studies for inclusion. In total, 4,554 articles were identified, while 17 articles were finally included in data extraction. External joint loading parameters were calculated using the inverse dynamics approach and internal joint loading parameters by musculoskeletal modeling or instrumented prosthesis. It was found that the medial and total knee joint contact forces as well as hip joint contact forces in the first half of stance can be well predicted using external joint moments in the frontal plane, which is further improved by including the sagittal joint moment. Worse correlations were found for the peak in the second half of stance as well as for internal lateral knee joint contact forces. The estimation of external joint moments is useful for a general statement about the peak in the first half of stance or for the maximal loading. Nevertheless, when investigating diseases as valgus malalignment, the estimation of lateral knee joint contact forces is necessary for clinical decision making because external joint moments could not predict the lateral knee joint loading sufficient enough. Dependent on the clinical question, either estimating the external joint moments by inverse dynamics or internal joint contact forces by musculoskeletal modeling should be used.


Spinal Cord ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 283-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
B Yilmaz ◽  
Y Demir ◽  
E Özyörük ◽  
S Kesikburun ◽  
Ü Güzelküçük

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document