A New Fixation Technique for the Lapidus Bunionectomy

2005 ◽  
Vol 95 (4) ◽  
pp. 405-409 ◽  
Author(s):  
James C. Wang ◽  
Brendan M. Riley
Keyword(s):  
Internal Fixation ◽  
External Fixation ◽  
External Fixator ◽  
Preliminary Report ◽  
Delayed Union ◽  
Oral Antibiotics ◽  
Fixation Technique ◽  
Short Course ◽  
Time To Initiation ◽  
Fixation Techniques

Presented here is a preliminary report of 102 patients who underwent first metatarsocuneiform joint arthrodeses performed with external fixation for the correction of hallux valgus. The advantages of using external fixation are the ability to initiate early weightbearing, predictable fusion, and removal of all of the hardware postoperatively. In the 102 patients reported here, the average time to initiation of unassisted full weightbearing was 13.1 days. The average time to fusion was 5.3 weeks, with removal of the external fixator at an average of 5.5 weeks postoperatively. There was no incidence of delayed union or nonunion. There was one case of pin-tract irritation, which resolved with appropriate pin care and a short course of oral antibiotics. External fixation is an effective alternative to traditional internal fixation techniques in metatarsocuneiform joint arthrodesis. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 95(4): 405–409, 2005)

Clinical Value of Computer-Assisted Taylor Three-dimensional External Fixation in the Treatment of Tibiofibular Fracture (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongfeng Sheng ◽  
Weixing Xu ◽  
Bin Xu ◽  
Hongpu Song ◽  
Di Lu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
External Fixation ◽  
External Fixator ◽  
Theoretical Basis ◽  
New Technology ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Clinical Value

UNSTRUCTURED The retrospective study of Taylor's three-dimensional external fixator for the treatment of tibiofibular fractures provides a theoretical basis for the application of this technology. The paper collected 28 patients with tibiofibular fractures from the Department of Orthopaedics in our hospital from March 2015 to June 2018. After the treatment, the follow-up evaluation of Taylor's three-dimensional external fixator for the treatment of tibiofibular fractures and concurrency the incidence of the disease, as well as the efficacy and occurrence of the internal fixation of the treatment of tibial fractures in our hospital. The results showed that Taylor's three-dimensional external fixator was superior to orthopaedics in the treatment of tibiofibular fractures in terms of efficacy and complications. To this end, the thesis research can be concluded as follows: Taylor three-dimensional external fixation in the treatment of tibiofibular fractures is more effective, and the incidence of occurrence is low, is a new technology for the treatment of tibiofibular fractures, it is worthy of clinical promotion.

scholarly journals Can a linear external fixator stand as a surgical alternative to open reduction in treating a high-grade supracondylar humerus fracture?

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 133-141
Author(s):  
Barak Rinat ◽  
Eytan Dujovny ◽  
Noam Bor ◽  
Nimrod Rozen ◽  
Guy Rubin
Keyword(s):  
Internal Fixation ◽  
External Fixation ◽  
External Fixator ◽  
Closed Reduction ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Supracondylar Humerus Fractures ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Humerus Fractures ◽  
Carrying Angle

Objective High-grade pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures are commonly treated with closed reduction and internal fixation with percutaneous pinning. When this fails, open reduction followed by internal fixation is the widely accepted procedure of choice. Use of a lateral external fixator was recently described as an optional procedure, but evidence is scarce. Methods We investigated the outcomes of upper limbs treated by either open reduction with internal fixation or closed reduction and external fixation. Results Twenty-one patients completed the long-term follow-up; 11 underwent open reduction, and 10 underwent external fixation. Most patients in both groups reported excellent satisfaction. In both groups, the modified Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was extremely low and the average elbow range of motion was almost identical. Radiographic analysis consisting of Baumann’s angle and the carrying angle revealed no statistical difference between the two groups. Discussion Optional treatment using a linear external fixator for complex nonreducible supracondylar humerus fractures yielded acceptable clinical and radiographic results, as with open reduction. Our sample size was small, but the promising results may assist in the implementation of an alternative surgical procedure, especially in more complicated cases involving flexion-type fractures or severe soft tissue damage and swelling.

Ankle spanning external fixator with limited internal fixation for distal tibial extra-articular fractures

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (10) ◽  
pp. 4355
Author(s):  
Siddharth Goel ◽  
Abhay Elhence
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
External Fixation ◽  
External Fixator ◽  
Tibial Fractures ◽  
Fixation Method ◽  
Ankle Pain ◽  
Distal Tibial Fractures ◽  
Tract Infections

Background: Fractures of the distal tibia are among the most difficult fractures to treat. The short distal segment presents difficulty in choosing the appropriate fixation method. The greatest challenge lies in the relatively tight soft tissue around the ankle. As a result, it has been a recent interest in treating these fractures with external fixation and limited internal fixation. The external stable fixation methods used are tubular or ring fixators, with or without immobilising the ankle. This minimally invasive nature of the surgery can avoid catastrophic wound complications like dehiscence, implant exposure and infection.Methods: 18 patients with extra-articular distal tibial fractures (AO Type 43A) were treated with the technique of ankle spanning external fixation. Lag screws or K-wires were supplemented for limited internal fixation when required. Fibula was stabilised in all cases. Intra- articular and Compound fractures were excluded. In addition to union at fracture site, ankle pain and motion was noted in each follow-up.Results: The mean follow-up was 25 months. Of the 18 patients included all but one fractures united with an average healing time of 16 to 18 weeks. Ankle pain and motion was graded according to Mazur modified by Teeny and Wiss clinical scoring system. 15 of them had excellent or good results, 2 had fair results. One patient had poor result. Five pin tract infections occurred. 17 patients had no evidence of osteoarthritis after completing follow up of at least 2 years.Conclusions: Distal tibial fractures are complex injuries, not only regarding the bony component, but also in terms of the management of the soft tissue problem. Ankle Spanning External Fixator with Limited Internal fixation is a relatively simple and cost-effective method for treating these fractures, achieving union and also maintaining ankle function.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Various Arrangements of Pelvic External Rod Fixators in Polytraumatized Patients at Resuscitation Step

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-18
Author(s):  
P. A Ivanov ◽  
N. N Zadneprovskiy
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
External Fixation ◽  
Pelvic Fractures ◽  
External Fixators ◽  
High Efficacy ◽  
Fixation Technique ◽  
Pelvic Fixation ◽  
Fixation Methods ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Fixation Techniques

Application of external fixators (EF) in pelvic fractures is one of the important components of antishock therapy in patients with polytrauma. However various fixation techniques possess certain advantages and disadvantages. Comparative analysis of 4 most commonly used variants of pelvic EF mounting, i.e. classic - via upper flaring portion of the ilium, supra-acetabular, orthogonal - combination of screws passes through the wings and supra-acetabular region, and subcristal, that were applied in 32, 48, 13 and 3 patients, was performed. Results of the analysis showed that supra-acetabular pelvic fixation technique a preferable one due to its high efficacy and lower rate of complications as compared to other external fixation methods.

Skeletal Stabilisation

2020 ◽  
pp. 41-56
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
External Fixation ◽  
Surgical Procedures ◽  
External Fixator ◽  
Definitive Treatment ◽  
Mutual Understanding ◽  
Published Evidence ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Skeletal Stability

In this chapter we draw upon published evidence and the experience of the authors to provide guidance in stabilisation for open tibial fractures. Most orthopaedic surgeons have, through their training, reached higher levels of proficiency and expertise in methods of internal fixation than with external fixation. The difference reflects the greater number of fractures treated with internal fixation methods. Spanning external fixation should provide skeletal stability without impeding access for plastic surgical procedures. This combination of prerequisites has to be met through a mutual understanding of bony and soft tissue requirements at first debridement and at definitive treatment of the open fracture. Many fixator configurations used currently and even advocated for in external fixator manuals simply fail to meet these requirements. Consequently, we provide a clear rationale for the recommendations made and encourage adoption of the principles described.

scholarly journals Operative fixation for complex tibial fractures

2012 ◽  
Vol 94 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
AJP Hutchinson ◽  
AE Frampton ◽  
R Bhattacharya
Keyword(s):  
English Literature ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Delayed Union ◽  
Tibial Fractures ◽  
Fixation Technique ◽  
Non Union ◽  
Fixation Techniques ◽  
Secondary Procedures ◽  
Operative Fixation ◽  
Tibial Shaft Fractures

INTRODUCTION The management of open tibial shaft fractures remains challenging. Intramedullary nailing and external fixation are the most commonly used fixation techniques although the optimal fixation technique remains unresolved. In this article the outcomes of these two surgical techniques are compared. METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted through MEDLINE® using Ovid® and MeSH (Medical Subject Heading) terms for articles published in the English literature between 1999 and 2009. The outcome measures compared were time to fracture union, infection rates and complications. RESULTS Forty-one studies were identified, of which only three met the inclusion criteria. The average time to union was variable. Delayed union and non-union appeared to be more prevalent in the external fixator group although this was not statistically significant. Both techniques were associated with secondary procedures as well as infection. CONCLUSIONS The current literature indicates little evidence to suggest the superiority of one fixation technique over another for open tibial fractures.

External Fixation for Comminuted Phalangeal Fractures

1996 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 760-764 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. FITOUSSI ◽  
W. Y. IP ◽  
S. P. CHOW
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
External Fixation ◽  
Cadaver Study ◽  
Kirschner Wires ◽  
Fixation Technique ◽  
Lateral Plate ◽  
Lateral Plating ◽  
Phalangeal Fractures ◽  
Phalangeal Fracture

The mechanical rigidity obtained by external fixation in a comminuted phalangeal fracture model was assessed and the results compared with two other types of internal fixation commonly used (lateral plate and crossed Kirschner wires) in a biomechanical cadaver study. Each fixation technique was tested in apex palmar bending, compression and torsion. The results showed that lateral plating provided the best rigidity in apex palmar bending and compression and that external fixation and Kirschner wires showed the same mechanical properties. For the torque test, external fixation provided the best rigidity.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Various Arrangements of Pelvic External Rod Fixators in Polytraumatized Patients at Resuscitation Step

2014 ◽  
pp. 12-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. A. Ivanov ◽  
N. N. Zadneprovskiy
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
External Fixation ◽  
Pelvic Fractures ◽  
External Fixators ◽  
High Efficacy ◽  
Fixation Technique ◽  
Pelvic Fixation ◽  
Fixation Methods ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Fixation Techniques

Application of external fixators (EF) in pelvic fractures is one of the important components of antishock therapy in patients with polytrauma. However various fixation techniques possess certain advantages and disadvantages. Comparative analysis of 4 most commonly used variants of pelvic EF mounting, i.e. classic - via upper flaring portion of the ilium, supra-acetabular, orthogonal - combination of screws passes through the wings and supra-acetabular region, and subcristal, that were applied in 32, 48, 13 and 3 patients, was performed. Results of the analysis showed that supra-acetabular pelvic fixation technique a preferable one due to its high efficacy and lower rate of complications as compared to other external fixation methods.

scholarly journals An Alternative Site for Pin Placement in External Fixation of Pelvic Fractures: Lateral Posterior Pelvic External Fixator Surgical Technique

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias K. Russ ◽  
Pierre Navarre ◽  
Jarrad P. Stevens
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Technique ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
External Fixation ◽  
External Fixator ◽  
Pelvic Fractures ◽  
Interquartile Range ◽  
Definitive Treatment ◽  
Easy Access ◽  
Lateral Posterior ◽  
Insertion Sites

Introduction: The application of an external fixator for unstable pelvic fractures is an important component of many resuscitation protocols. Moreover, certain pelvic fractures may be treated with an external fixator without requiring further internal fixation. We report our initial clinical results with an alternate pelvic external fixator site, the lateral posterior external fixator (LPEF), and describe the surgical technique.Methods and Materials: From 2010 to 2013, we identified 27 consecutive patients (mean age 44.6 years, range 18–80 years) treated by the same surgeon (MKR) with an LPEF in a level 1 trauma center. Retrospective data collection included mechanism of injury, surgical interventions, and complications.Results: The LPEF was used in 16 patients as acute pelvic stabilization and converted at a median of 2 days (interquartile range 1–3.5) to internal fixation, whereas in 10 patients, it was used as definitive treatment and removed at a median of 48 days (interquartile range 37–64). One patient died on day 14, secondary to his severe closed head injury. The only surgical complications were two wound infections (20%, 2/10 in the group of definitive LPEFs), which resolved without sequelae after the removal of the LPEF (at 36 and 50 days) and antibiotics, one case of loss of fixation leading to the removal of the LPEF at 71 days, and one patient who had hypergranulating external fixator sites and eventually healed without any cutaneous sequelae. All fractures consolidated in a good position.Discussion: The described techniques of pelvic external fixation include the anterosuperior (iliac wing), supra-acetabular (anteroinferior), and subcristal (anterior superior iliac spine) insertion sites. The reported infection rates in definitive pelvic fracture treatment range from 20 to 40%. Due to the localization of the insertion sites, the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve is potentially at risk with the last two techniques. On the other hand, the LPEF insertion site is quite safe, as it is anatomically far from any nerves and the inguinal region, and allows easy access for laparotomy. The results in this series suggest that the lateral posterior pelvic external fixator technique is an alternative to previous techniques with a low risk of complications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document